Wednesday, 19 April 2000
HUD’s gun buybacks off to a slow start http://www.azstarnet.com/public/dnews/000419WGunBuybacks.html
The Associated Press
WASHINGTON — Five months after President Clinton announced a $15 million plan to buy and destroy unwanted guns, only about 20 percent of the money has been earmarked for such initiatives.
The major problem with the Buyback America program is how the money is handed out. Local governments must spend $100 of their drug-fighting funds from the Department of Housing and Urban Development to buy back guns from citizens to get an additional $43 from the federal government for the program.
The result is that a program administration officials predicted would get 300,000 guns off the streets so far has removed only about 50,000.
“Gun violence is not a huge issue for the residents of our housing,” said Virginia Felton of the Seattle Housing Authority, which did not apply for the program. “We can spend our resources more effectively in other crime-prevention areas.”
HUD spokesman David Egner said the agency is pleased with the program and it is moving much faster than expected. “No one ever said this program would buy all the guns in five months,” Egner said.
HUD Secretary Andrew Cuomo held a news conference yesterday to encourage more cities to apply for money. He was joined by several mayors, while the father of a student killed at Columbine lent his support via a satellite hookup from Denver.
“I can’t see how any mayor in any city would not want to be a part of this,” said Mayor Al Jurczynski of Schenectady, N.Y., one of 84 cities that has gotten money. His city has received $1,144 and plans to use it to buy 23 guns.
The program has come under fire from gun-rights groups and many Republicans in Congress. GOP leaders say HUD does not have the authority to spend anti-drug money to buy and destroy guns. The National Rifle Association says the money would be better spent elsewhere.
“I don’t think anyone would really try to argue that they’re seeing long lines of violent criminals with guns turning in the tools of their trade,” NRA spokesman Bill Powers said.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Sorry, forgot to post the link.
Skyhawk
[This message has been edited by Skyhawk (edited April 19, 2000).]
HUD’s gun buybacks off to a slow start http://www.azstarnet.com/public/dnews/000419WGunBuybacks.html
The Associated Press
WASHINGTON — Five months after President Clinton announced a $15 million plan to buy and destroy unwanted guns, only about 20 percent of the money has been earmarked for such initiatives.
The major problem with the Buyback America program is how the money is handed out. Local governments must spend $100 of their drug-fighting funds from the Department of Housing and Urban Development to buy back guns from citizens to get an additional $43 from the federal government for the program.
The result is that a program administration officials predicted would get 300,000 guns off the streets so far has removed only about 50,000.
“Gun violence is not a huge issue for the residents of our housing,” said Virginia Felton of the Seattle Housing Authority, which did not apply for the program. “We can spend our resources more effectively in other crime-prevention areas.”
HUD spokesman David Egner said the agency is pleased with the program and it is moving much faster than expected. “No one ever said this program would buy all the guns in five months,” Egner said.
HUD Secretary Andrew Cuomo held a news conference yesterday to encourage more cities to apply for money. He was joined by several mayors, while the father of a student killed at Columbine lent his support via a satellite hookup from Denver.
“I can’t see how any mayor in any city would not want to be a part of this,” said Mayor Al Jurczynski of Schenectady, N.Y., one of 84 cities that has gotten money. His city has received $1,144 and plans to use it to buy 23 guns.
The program has come under fire from gun-rights groups and many Republicans in Congress. GOP leaders say HUD does not have the authority to spend anti-drug money to buy and destroy guns. The National Rifle Association says the money would be better spent elsewhere.
“I don’t think anyone would really try to argue that they’re seeing long lines of violent criminals with guns turning in the tools of their trade,” NRA spokesman Bill Powers said.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Sorry, forgot to post the link.
Skyhawk
[This message has been edited by Skyhawk (edited April 19, 2000).]