I think more people will want to spend the extra money to get a Glock, Sig, or Beretta instead of XD. I would.
Orlando5: I'd pay the extra money for a Glock, SIG, or Beretta, only after making an honest first-hand evaluation against the XD and finding out that I preferred the features and comfort of, and truly shot better with, one of the other choices.
My HS2000 groups as well as any 9mm handgun I've owned. It groups better than my SIG 225, and as well or slightly better than either of my SIG 239s. It absolutely smoked my S&W 6906 (since sold) and likewise my Kahr P9 (also sold). It's dead-nuts even with my CZ-PCR Compact, and is only exceeded in accuracy by my CZ75B --- after 25yds.
It is very robustly built, it is superbly reliable --- not a single failure in over 6,000 rounds, it is exceptionally comfortable --- second only to my SIG 225, it is quite accurate, it has a higher number of safeties than most pistols --- while still maintaining an "always ready" status, and it is now backed by a major manufacturer.
My personal experience, as well as the experience of many HS2000 owner's (a good number of whom also own or have owned pistols manufactured by the Big Name guys), suggests that it would be wise to include the Springfield XD on the list of quality handgun choices. Who knows, it just might save you a hundred bucks or more...
Take care. Marko