So, I had a guy asking me about rifles today. Specifically, the AR-15 and the AK-47. I began to explain the differences, when he interrupted to ask, "which is more tactical?"
"Ummm," I stammered. "I...um...guess that depends on how you're...um...deploying (?) it."
He said, "well, it's just a fallback, if you know what I mean."
I replied that I regretted not knowing exactly what he meant.
He then said, and I am not kidding, "my first line of defense is my hands. They're registered as lethal weapons."
I deserve a medal of some sort for keeping a straight face. I really do. Many responses flashed through my mind, but the one I voiced was, "so how do you go about registering them? Is there paperwork? What agency handles and tracks the registrations?"
He stammered something about "the police" and wandered off.
My question is this: where did this idea come from? Has there ever been a situation in where it was not only possible, but required, to register one's hands as lethal weapons?
"Ummm," I stammered. "I...um...guess that depends on how you're...um...deploying (?) it."
He said, "well, it's just a fallback, if you know what I mean."
I replied that I regretted not knowing exactly what he meant.
He then said, and I am not kidding, "my first line of defense is my hands. They're registered as lethal weapons."
I deserve a medal of some sort for keeping a straight face. I really do. Many responses flashed through my mind, but the one I voiced was, "so how do you go about registering them? Is there paperwork? What agency handles and tracks the registrations?"
He stammered something about "the police" and wandered off.
My question is this: where did this idea come from? Has there ever been a situation in where it was not only possible, but required, to register one's hands as lethal weapons?