How does it matter?

V

VA Gent

New member
Looking to buy a eqrly 1900 Spanish mauser. Gun has matching serial numbers on receiver, stock, and triggerguard, bolt and floorplate do not match. How would this affect functions/accuracy? Rifle is described as being a good shooter. Other than it going bang when trigger is pulled, could it be dialed in to be a good hunter?
 
If the barrel is good and the rifle headspaces OK, it should be a fine rifle for deer-size game in the original 7x57 (7mm Mauser), or it can be rebarrelled to any cartridge in that pressure range.

Jim
 
Thanks Jim. The description is brief but makes me thing a good cleaning and use will help it back to good as it can be? Description is "Bore is average-good, dark with strong rifling."
I purchased a German 7mm barrel from him in the past. It was way better than I expected which is why I "think" I want to go after this rifle. I have no idea what diiference it would make for the unmatching bolt though. Any in depth thoughts would be welcomed!
John
 
Any time a bolt is replaced, the issue of headspace arises. In most cases, the headspace will be OK or close enough that there will be no problem. In the worst situation, you could get case separation or even a blown rifle. One shot from a rest (the old "tie it to a tire" is not a bad idea) should show if things are OK or you could have a gunsmith check the headspace.

Those Spanish rifles were imported literally by the shipload; many were in good condiiton, but some were badly rusted with ruined wood. Few were in top condition or like new. They are not high priced even today, usually bringing $120-150. If they can be used "as is", they can be a good deer rifle, but most owners don't want to spend a lot of money on them.

Still, they are basically good rifles, and I have seen a few on which a goodly amount of money was spent, resulting in a very nice handy rifle.

Jim
 
Okay. Would you consider a modern say, Ruger MK in 7x57 to be a better choice? I was thinking the longer barrel and twist rate of the older mausers were something worth experiencing. I have new rifles in 223, 243, 270, 3030, 3006 & 338 win mag as my taste is only for deer here and javelina, elk out west. For some reason, I think I can eliminate several of these new ones by going with the old timers and possibly enjoying it more.
 
VA Gent-
A Ruger in 7X57 would always be better than a Spanish Mauser in the same chambering. Rugers are very sturdy rifles, and can take loads that would be the end of a Spanish Mauser. I own and shoot a Ruger 77 in 7X57, it is my favorite hunting rifle.
 
I don't question that a new Ruger would be better than an old Spanish Mauser, but i am not sure that it "can take loads that would be the end of a Spanish Mauser". Those old Mausers are pretty tough and I have seen folks use some darned stiff loads in them.

Rugers are undoubtedly good rifles but not magic. I would say that any load that would be dangerous in the Mauser, would also be dangerous in about anything else, including the Ruger.

Jim
 
The steel in the Spanish Mausers is soft. Heavy loads will twist the receivers until the bolt won't open.
 
Scorch - Is that the one you've been using for some 30 years? The 223, 243, 270 & 338 win mag are Ruger 77's, I like them too. The 3006 is a 7400 engraved Buckmaster unfired since new some 14 years ago. I was keeping it for the eventual elk run or where-ever it would fit the occaison. Don't really care for the 06 though but it is eye candy. Guess thats why it's still here. So maybe the better plan would be to keep the Spanish 7 for 4th of July blending with the fireworks and look into another MKII. Gotta admit, I don't mind if the weather changes when I have a stainless/composite stocked 77 with me. It always cleans up very nice afterwards.
Darn...the thoughts continue...
Thanks Scorch
 
The steel in the Spanish Mausers is soft. Heavy loads will twist the receivers until the bolt won't open.

Yea, I have heard talk about this from different directions.
John
 
I would say that any load that would be dangerous in the Mauser, would also be dangerous in about anything else, including the Ruger.
Click to expand...
Perhaps. Spanish Mausers are tough, but they were originally designed around a cartridge that generates about 50K psi. Rugers are routinely chambered for cartridges that generate 65K+ psi with never any talk about locking lug setback or growing headspace. A am a big fan of Spanish Mausers, owned and shot several of them for about 10 years, but I also realize they have their limitations.
 
Okay. Would you consider a modern say, Ruger MK in 7x57 to be a better choice?
Click to expand...

Well, this is getting a little OT for a Curio & Relic thread, but unless you are just interested in hunting with old military rifles, or have a "thing" for the 7X57 Mauser round, a modern Ruger in 7MM-08 would be a much better choice. No smithing, or bubbaing needed for optics, and ammo that is both less expensive, and easier to find.
 
Quote:
unless you are just interested in hunting with old military rifles........

I am somewhat. My roots go back to Vera Cruz some 90 years ago when this rifle I have would be 12 years old. The Mexican colors painted on the sides of the stock, Mexican disc emblem and Villa stamped into the stocked is authenticity and I can admire that. It appears to have been a real workhorse and no doubt helped populate cemetaries. It's time to have it do something usefull in a different manner...feed the family in a semi retired way. For that, I can appreciate it more as it will have a 2nd history, with me. That 102 year old actually means more to me than the new ones I have. Can't explain that but I guess it's the sum of the total.
 
Quote:
I also realize they have their limitations........

I guess thats why you invested in the MK, nice caliber while the MK offers refinements.

The limitations I'll probably never discover other than reports from distance test shoots at the range. Thinking better, I think for around here I'd like to dial it in to 200 yds max and I prefer iron sites. Pleases me to just use it for what it was designed for. If it kicks in my undesirable range, it will sit more. Some say less than a 270, some say kicks like a mule. Of course some say the 270 is 1/2 the 06...I have a recoil chart from Chuck Hawks but to me they are just a bunch of numbers. Actual is best I think. For instance, I ONLY take this 338 mag out when I know:
A) distance merits it ( I use it for mountain top to mountan top mostly out west ) Funny about that caliber. People have driven from several miles away thru the desert and asked what the hell was that?
B) 1 - 2 shots will be the limit for that hunt.
 
Something to consider about hunting with iron sights on an old military Mauser is the point of aim/point of impact. I do not know for sure about the Spanish models, but some Mausers the closest sight setting is 400 Meters.

You may find that at the lowest setting it still shoots about 16 inches high at 100 yards. For a military rifle where recruits are taught to aim for the belt buckle, this is fine, but for a hunting rifle, it could be a problem.
 
Yes, it was mentioned earlier this rifle was zeroed @ 300yds by the manufacturer. This ladder sight goes from 4 - 18. I'd like to see how much it might have drifted at that distance. This on a whole is a gray area to me. Sights will most likely need some modifications but don't know at the moment. All part of the bonding if it is to be.
 
Hey Dennis, I remember reading your original post. If I remember correctly, you went through 3 rifles and called it quits?
 
This rifle is in the original chambering. Update! - Cool, I have a guy online that I have been buying guns from for 40+years. My old smithy so to speak...he's going to fine tooth comb this mauser, laser bore sight and trial shoot out back. We'll see what the report card says!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top