How can this man look at himself in the mirror ?

R

RH

New member
He can't possibly beleive his own words...can he ?

Clinton Continues Gun-Safety Plea
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Making the case for stricter gun safety laws, President Clinton suggested that measures included in legislation languishing on Capitol Hill could prevent tragedies such as the killing last week of a 6-year-old Michigan girl.
''I'm not at all sure that even a callous, irresponsible drug dealer with a 6-year-old in the house wouldn't leave a child trigger lock on a gun,'' Clinton said in an interview with CNN's ''Burden of Proof,'' a transcript of which was released Thursday by the White House.

How exactly would you define "callous & irresponsible" then ? Callous & irresponsible drug dealers I guess are the only citizens he trusts to be responsible gun owners. Baffling that nobody in the media calls him on this nonsense.
 
I think politicians don't live in the real world in that they don't experience what normal folks do every day. Remember Bush's comments on the grocery store scanners and couldn't say how much a gallon of milk costs? Those that want to have trigger locks sold with guns have obviously not purchased a gun. Every gun I've purchased has had a lock with it, from the 96 Inox to the USPc to the Mossberg 500.
 
Why would he have put a trigger lock on a STOLEN gun? Besides, if he did properly install it, he would have had to UNLOAD the firearm first (per the instructions on every single gun lock I've ever seen). That's like him saying that had the proper laws been in place, Monica would have been wearing a lobster bib, thus not "ruined" that blue dress. It's all just idiodic dribble in an attempt to further his agenda. What a looser.
-John
 
Here’s the link to the full story: http://www.foxnews.com:80/national/030900/guncontrol.sml

Here’s the story:
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>"I'm not at all sure that even a callous, irresponsible drug dealer with a 6-year-old in the house wouldn't leave child trigger lock on a gun," Clinton said in an interview with CNN's Burden of Proof, a transcript of which was released Thursday by the White House.
Clinton has stepped up pressure on Congress since the shooting of Kayla Rolland at a school in Mount Morris Township, Mich. She was killed by a first-grade classmate who had taken the gun from an adult living in the house of his uncle, where the child was staying.
A White House meeting with key House and Senate judiciary committee leaders failed to yield an agreement to resume negotiations over a gun bill.
The administration wants to require safety locks on new guns, ban the import of large-capacity ammunition clips and require a three-day waiting period for background checks before buying a weapon at gun shows.
House and Senate conferees have not met since August, unable to bridge differences over the gun show provision. The House version would require a 24-hour waiting period.
In the CNN interview, the president repeated his call for licensing gun owners and said that in the future, trigger locks could be retrofitted for old handguns.
"If I could pass this, then I'd start looking at what to do with the guns that are out there now, whether we could get trigger locks for them and how we'd do it," he said.
The president also reminded that he was no stranger to gun culture.
"I have owned hunting weapons," he said, adding that he had been given handguns by police groups that he had addressed. "I've always kept them under secure circumstances outside the house when Chelsea was a little girl."
"I still remember shooting cans off in the country with a .22 when I was 12," he said. "And I've hunted on and off all my life."[/quote]

I guess the last few lines of the story are supposed to give us gun owners the warm fuzzies. Personally it gives me the cold queasies.

It isn’t enough that he vilifies guns and spouts off that "evil assault weapons" corrupt otherwise placid folks. Now he’s sanctifying trigger locks, stating that they’ll make a dirt-bag drug dealer care about "the children." Apparently there is nothing wrong with a "callous, irresponsible drug dealer" having a kid in a crack-house. Then again, why should I expect the "king of irresponsibility" to hold anyone *else* responsible for their actions?

In the words of Yosemite Sam: "Reznkrusnfreginrazafrazaguzzinfudda" Where’s that puking smiley? It’d go well with these. :mad: :mad:


------------------
RKBA!

"The people have the right to bear arms for their defense and security"
Ohio Constitution, Article I, Section 4
Concealed Carry is illegal in Ohio.
Ohioans for Concealed Carry Website
 
There isn't an anti-gun politician I know who doesn't preface his remarks by saying he's a hunter, too. In the first place, the pol probably went out hunting once 30 years ago and, in the second place, who cares? I'm far more trusting of someone who's _never_ owned a gun but supports the 2nd.

Dick
 
I wonder if " hangin' his wienie in the wind " in front of Paula Jones comes under the heading " Hunting " .

------------------
TOM SASS MEMBER AMERICAN LEGION MEMBER NRA MEMBER
 
What would you bet that he made it all up???
He is such a fxxxxxx liar that I bet he DID make it up.
I remember reading sobebody, possibly the NRA already established that he never had a hunting license.
If he was given guns do you think he was responsible enough to have kept a bill of sale???
How can we best challenge him on this?
I have had enough of his lies. Lets stick it to him!!!!

------------------
Better days to be,

Ed
 
I don't know about a license but he DID go on a duck hunt in Arkansas not long into his first term--made American Rifleman. He called his loaner shotgun a rifle and assured the American people that such harmless hunting "rifles" were of course to be protected. The real irony is that I hear it was a semi-auto which actually WAS covered by the legislation he was backing at the time.
 
RH,
We've got another 315 days or so before Arkansas gets him back for good.
Won't come soon enough for me.
Just hope he doesn't have too many 'surprises' left for us...

------------------
...defend the 2nd., it protects us all.
No fate but what we make...
 
Obviously, the last lines of the story are meant to portray what "responsible" firearms owners believe.

I'll choose to believe it when he steps up to the plate and explains how "responsible sexually active adults" should act. But, then, we already know: We use our offices and power to seduce 21 year old bimbettes; we demean women with neat cigar tricks worthy of a distempered preadolescent who was, himself, sexually abused; we physically attack women who happen to be in the wrong place at the wrong time; and then we return to the power of our office and use it to discredit, threaten and destroy those who would step forward and expose us.

So what's your point, Bill? You've already had your share of public negligent discharges.....and some have killed....putz.
Rich
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top