Home Invasion: Did Homeowner Go Too Far?

X

xrocket

New member
Home Invasion: Home Owner Taken Into Custody!

This morning in Dallas Texas according to Dallas Morning News:

DALLAS — An attempted home invasion ended with what police called an all-out gun battle early Wednesday in a North Dallas residential neighborhood.

Police said four heavily-armed men attempted to break into a house in the 9000 block of Woodshore Drive near North Central Expressway and Royal Lane at 2:30 a.m.

The homeowner had a gun and opened fire on the suspects. He pursued them as they fled, hitting at least two of them, police said.

One was found dead in an SUV several blocks away from the crime scene. Another was taken to Baylor University Medical Center in very critical condition. The homeowner was not hurt.

A third suspect was taken into custody and the fourth fled the scene. An AK-47 assault rifle was found near the suspects' vehicle.

Police said a gunshot victim who showed up later at Parkland Memorial Hospital may be linked to the home invasion attempt.

While investigators said the homeowner was within his legal rights to fire on intruders, he may be subject to charges because he left his property to pursue the robbery suspects in his vehicle.

The homeowner, whose name was unavailable, was taken into custody for questioning. No charges had been filed against him.


I think the fact that he got into his car and gave chase might put his tail in the ringer. Was it reckless? Was he foolish? Yes he was, but he got three of them. JMO. :]
 
conjecture

I think the fact that he got into his car and gave chase might put his tail in the ringer. Was it reckless? Was he foolish? Yes he was, but he got three of them. JMO.
Click to expand...

Based on the very preliminary details you have listed here you may be correct and I would agree with you however there still remains a void as to exactly what transpired and what ALL of the facts are and IMHO until the true details are known everything else is conjecture.
 
Your right he should not have pursued them but hopefully he won't be charged.

Those guys got what they deserved or at least so far one of them did.
 
Obviously, there will be much more details and facts to evolve from this newsflash. I thought it newsworthy enough to open a discussion on the homeowners tactical decision to leave his property and pursue the perps by auto. Raging gun battles through Dallas suburbs at 2:30 AM in this particular neighborhood are not normal. The homeowner has allot of moxie.
 
conjecture

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quote:
I think the fact that he got into his car and gave chase might put his tail in the ringer. Was it reckless? Was he foolish? Yes he was, but he got three of them. JMO.

Based on the very preliminary details you have listed here you may be correct however I would stress that there still remains a void as to exactly what transpired and what ALL of the facts are and IMHO until the true details are known everything else is conjecture.
__________________
Click to expand...


+1 To the fact that he likely went too far, we shall see.

Those guys got what they deserved or at least so far one of them did.
Click to expand...

I say more power to him I'd have done the SAME thing. btw 3 outta 4 aint bad
Click to expand...

All I can say is WOW, just WOW, I hope that nate45 and SpookBoy don't really own any firearms.:barf:
 
By Florida standard yes he went to far

Hopefully he can argue heat of the moment and get off or at least a very minimal sentence

Maybe he can make an argument that they were a danger to the community

And yes Outcast
Anyone who gets killed while invading a home with murderous intent gets what he deserves
And getting three out of four while being surprised and outnumbered four to one is good work
 
wow, I don't think I'd want to leave my property, but I can see getting caught up in the heat of the moment...

But regardless, I like the fact that these home invaders are meeting more and more armed response here in the Dallas area. Good for getting a few more off the streets and making others think twice.
 
This is another debate (sigh) where I am pulled both ways.

First, Ayoob put it best when he stated that a citizen/homeowner/CCW licensed user is not a sworn officer. Not only would he be reacting beyond his legal limits, but far beyond his training. He is also "out in the world" and he is responsible for every shot he takes.

Having said that, I get angry when I'm attacked. I'd be furious if I was attacked in my home. That act would not only make me feel violated in my own space but it endanger my wife, my dogs and any nearby neighbors by ricochets and penetrating shots.

Like you do, I keep firearms in various places in my home. (We have no children.) One such automatic pistol is in/on a table facing the front door.

In the heat of an exchange, hoping I am still alive, I can foresee an adrenaline dump that just might want to make me hit back. It's a feeling that I have had before. I may very well give chase. Sitting here, calm, before my computer, it would be a foolish thing to do.

Yes, arresting the home owner is a very real problem, and probably correct until everything is straightened out.

In law we have The Doctrine of the Reasonable Man. Taken into account, I hope a reasonable DA or jury will consider that.
 
Legally he went too far. It is hard to make a self defense case when you chase the criminals through the streets.

Tactically he went too far. Chasing four armed men in a car with your own is not a smart idea.

This sounds fishy... He was targetted by four attackers at 2:30 in the morning with at least one AK and who knows what else... Somehow he got the drop on all of them and then saw fit to chase them down... I would be interseted to see what else comes out of this as I would be willing to be he might have known who these guys were and that there was a reason for his being targetted.
 
We'll have to see the facts. In Texas, one is allowed to use deadly force to prevent someone from fleeing after committing burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, or theft during the nighttime from escaping the property, and the actor believes (reasonably) the land or property cannot be protected or recovered by any other means, or not using deadly force would expose the actor or another to a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury. Tex. Pen. Code §9.42.

There's a newish DA in Dallas. We'll see if he's going to be a typical Democrat about self-defense issues or not.

We'll also have to see what exactly the facts were in this case. Does he fit in with any of the criteria as put forth by the above Penal Code definitions?
 
Looks like just another student of Machiavelli.

"Men ought to be either indulged or utterly destroyed, for if you merely offend them they take vengeance, but if you injure them greatly they are unable to retaliate, so that the injury done to a man ought to be such that vengeance cannot be feared."

:)
 
Did he go too far? Probably.

But because we really don't know all the details and background involved in this incident, we'll just have to wait to see what the jury says.
 
I happened to wake up the other night to use the pot. Looked out the back and saw the motion detector light on. Told the who/whatever in the back yard to get going and now. Heard what sounded like a kid say "aw ****" and a single set of footsteps head down the drive.

If I'm ever on a jury and a fellow who otherwise was acting in self-defense and a gun fight started in his home but he pushed them out of his house (off the objective), he has my vote for not guilty.
 
Well outcast I really dont care if i offended you :barf:what right does that give you to discern anyones firearm ownership?,all I have to say is shame on the people that come to my place in the middle of the night,we cant all offer them tea and crumpets!
And on the subject of legality what about the 4 armed assailants who drove to his house,at 2:30 in the morning with concealed weapons (maybe stolen) with the intention of commiting a felony,no one seems to be worried about that legal issue.
 
Last edited:
If a person's home is invaded by four "heavily armed" thugs and that person manages to drive them out of the house is the job done?

Not hardly.

Even if the invaders are "in flight" across the front lawn, they still pose a substantial danger to the homeowner. You don't know if their motives are to rob you or to kill everyone in the house. Since they did fire, you have to presume the worst (murder intent) in which case the homeowner cannot relax until they have been driven off.

So the homeowner stands on his porch, firing his uber-tactical gun as the thugs pile into a car parked in front of the house next door. In technical legalese, some lawyers will argue that defense rights stop at the property line. However, in realistic terms, the threat to the homeowner does NOT stop simply because the thugs have run to the street.

As the car drives off, should the homeowner fire parting shots at the fleeing thugs? Some will raise the liklihood of injuring "innocent parties" if the car goes out of control, though this seems thin for a residential zone at 2:30am. But I think a case can be made that thugs who are this brazen and violent certainly are a danger to the community and actions taken to stop them are justifiable under the law. A departing car still holds danger for the homeowner as it may contain heavier weaponry. They may use it for a final drive-by before leaving the area.

And there is the recognition that in such dramatic life-threatening events it is very difficult to try to "shut off" the defensive mode upon crossing some imaginary boundary.

Jumping into one's car and pursuing for blocks is, I'll agree, a bit overboard. But I'd still be likely to vote "not guilty" for a homeowner defending himself and family.
 
No he did not go to far as far as the info in the report...

Police said four heavily-armed men attempted to break into a house in the 9000 block of Woodshore Drive
Click to expand...

Four men break into your home... (I have a 2 year in mine) that are heavily armed and engage you are beggin to come back, especially after you shoot 1, 2, 3, of them. While I don't wish this on anyone he did what he thought best -- remember he did not initiate this. Now he will worry about retaliation from family (gang members) until he can safely move. WAY TO GO PROTECTING YOURSELF (AND PROBABLY FAMILY).
 
Even though the thugs weren't exactly driving home from Sunday school when the homeowner shot them, he probably overstepped his boundaries and shouldn't have gone that far.

That being said, it would be hard not to want to pursue them.

Hopefully the 'authorities' will be lenient.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top