Holographic sight vs red dot sight

xxxleafybugxxx

New member
I've been looking at videos and have seen that a lot of people have eo tech holographic sights. What do a holographic sight have to offer than a red dot sight don't? Or rather, what are the comparisons? Also, why are eo techs so expensive? What is the advantage they give you?
 
Holographic sights and red-dot sights are both variations of what is called a "reflex" sight. Basically, the idea is that unlike a scope, the reticle moves around the glass so it is always on the point of impact. The higher quality ones like the Eotech. Aimpoint, etc. have so little parallax as to be no-parallax for practical purposes.

A holographic sight projects a reticle on a screen using a laser. A "red dot" typically uses an LED diode to generate the light. The LED diode usually requires a tube-type construction.* The screen on the holographic sights can be bigger meaning you can track the point of impact over a wider area before the reticle disappears off the edges. They also play well with magnification (being a holograph). The downside is the laser is much more power hungry than an LED diode and the sights, while tough, are not as tough as some of their higher quality LED diode competitors.

*Some sights, like various cheap NcStar red dots, the C-More red dot, and the Trijicon Reflex attempt to do this without using a tube (or in the Reflex's case, without a diode either). The end result is usually a very dark "screen" in order to see the dot in daylight and the screen still tends to be about the same size as a tube sight anyway.
 
EOTechs, as well as Aimpoints, are used by the military. While both are outstanding sights, both manufacturers are marketing the military angle. The advantage of a reflex sight over a scope is easier target acquisition on close-range targets and because they are zero-magnification, they also allow for shooting with both eyes open. I used Aimpoints in the Army and own an EOTech for my personal AR, they are both good sights but the LGS had an EOTech at a good price ($415) so that's what I went with.
 
Eotechs are around the same price as Aimpoints last time i checked. Its really a personal choice. I have a micro H-1 that i love, the fact that the aimpoint is parallax free is a huge plus. None the less i'll probably have a EOtech XPS3 on my SBR.
 
IMO, one of the advantages of a holographic sight is there is no tube to constrict your FOV. Sight picture is also quicker.
 
Well that depends on you really. Plenty of people out there know their holds to hit a decent size target at 200-300yds. Varminting might be pushing it, and if thats your rout but you want a small optic that can be used at semi short range, but also out to 300yds, i'd recommend a ACOG.
 
the sight works the same at a 1000 yards but if you cant see what your chooting at its kinda hard to shoot long distances and to the dot at 100 + yards will be almost as big or larger then the target its self your looking at.
 
A lot depends on the MOA size of the dot. My holographic has a 2 MOA dot. This means the dot covers up 2" of a target that is 100 yards away. I have hit gophers well past 100 yards with a .22LR using open sights, my 2 MOA holographic sight and scopes. I personally would not want to go above 2 MOA for varmints and would even go less than 2MOA if possible - 1 MOA or 1.5 MOA
 
Back
Top