Hollow Point Penetration Ability Question

T

TheyChooseYou

Inactive
I know that the FBI Standard for adequate self defense ammo 12-18" of penetration in properly prepared 10% ballistics gel. And from my research, the vast majority of JHP's fall into the 12-14.5" range. I also know that penetration in gel is not the same as in a body, being that I've read that just penetrating skin is equivalent to 2" in gel. So my question is, while I know that a JHP will adequately penetrate your average sized Joe, and hit vitals such as the lungs or heart, will they be able to sufficiently penetrate larger/the largest sized people as well? Such as obese people, powerlifters/bodybuilders, or just super large statured people (and yes, I realize the odds of being attacked by people of this type are slim to none, but that's not the point, I'm curious as to what the limits of JHP are)? What about when an arm is in the way, and the JHP might have to go through bone? Will a bullet that goes 12" in gel, and possibly only 10" in a body still suffice? Thank you. I will post links to pics of the types of people that I am curious about.

https://i0.wp.com/media.globalnews....1102591555791.jpg?w=1040&quality=70&strip=all

And sorry about this second one, only link I could find, and for whatever reason it's EXTREMELY long.

Edit: Second link had to be removed, but just Google "Thor Bjornsson Man y Pacquiao" on Google Images, and you'll see Thor in a green shirt. It's very important to do this as you'll see the type of people I'm talking about, instead of just imagining "A big person", then commenting. So please look at the pic. Thanks.

The guy in green is Thor Bjornsson, Worlds Strongest Man winner @ 6'9 and 415 pounds. Basically all muscle. The other guy is, well....
 
Last edited:
After 4+ decades in law enforcement...
And 5+ decades hunting...

Practice
Placement
Penetration
All trump expansion

Specific to common service revolver/pistol calibers.
 
TBM900 said:
After 4+ decades in law enforcement...
And 5+ decades hunting...

Practice
Placement
Penetration
All trump expansion

Specific to common service revolver/pistol calibers.
Click to expand...
So for my next question, do you think "over penetration" is overblown out the wazoo?
 
Welcome to tfl!

I removed that extremely long "link" to make your post readable. The site did not recognize it as a link, and so it was useless gibberish. As a general rule here, if you have to scroll the screen sideways to see then entire post or pic, it is too wide and should be done differently.

As to penetration "specs" I suggest you look at the 1986 Miami FBI shootout as an example. Not about the actual inches of penetration, but as an example of how a round (a 9mm in that case) MET or exceeded every penetration spec the FBI had at the time, and still was found to "fail" in that shooting.

The bullet that "failed" was a fatal shot, but not an instantly incapacitating one. The bad guy lived about another minute, was mobile, and during that time killed a couple FBI agents and wounded several more. There are, of course a lot more things involved, it was an exceptional case.

The FBI's answer was to declare the 9mm unsuitable, adopt the 10mm, (later going to the .40S&W) and CHANGE THEIR SPECS about what was "adequate" penetration. Also note that a few years ago the FBI "readopted" the 9mm. I guess it's suitable, now.

Point here is, no matter who sets the specs the real world can sometimes toss in a situation outside what is planned for. As I see it, you are asking if JHP penetration (the amount common today) would be enough if you are attacked by "giant" size people. The only honest answer is "no one knows".

Every shooting situation is different, even the ones that appear identical are different in numerous details. Every person shot is different. What works in testing and what works 99% of the time on the street doesn't help you if the stars line up and you are in that 1% minority.

In the Bible, David killed Goliath with a sling stone. Some people say David won because he was God's chosen champion. I won't say they are wrong about that. But, I think Goliath was killed because he was shot in the head.

Draw your own conclusions...
 
"...the FBI Standard..." Is not a "standard" of any kind. The FBI does not arbitrate anything to do with firearms.
"...ballistics gel..." Doesn't really tell you much.
"...18" of penetration..." That would mean the target is very thick. Or it'd be a through and through that does not expend its energy in the target. How big the target is doesn't matter. Thor Bjornsson isn't bullet proof.
What a JHP does is expand rapidly, but controlled, upon impact causing more tissue damage than an FMJ of the same weight. A cast bullet of the same weight does more than an FMJ too as it'll break up causing even more tissue damage.
"...Goliath was killed because he was shot in the head..." Nope. Traumatic skull fracture caused by a severe blow to the head. That has never been proven to actually have occurred.
 
T. O'Heir said:
"...the FBI Standard..." Is not a "standard" of any kind. The FBI does not arbitrate anything to do with firearms.
"...ballistics gel..." Doesn't really tell you much.
"...18" of penetration..." That would mean the target is very thick. Or it'd be a through and through that does not expend its energy in the target. How big the target is doesn't matter. Thor Bjornsson isn't bullet proof.
What a JHP does is expand rapidly, but controlled, upon impact causing more tissue damage than an FMJ of the same weight. A cast bullet of the same weight does more than an FMJ too as it'll break up causing even more tissue damage.
"...Goliath was killed because he was shot in the head..." Nope. Traumatic skull fracture caused by a severe blow to the head. That has never been proven to actually have occurred.
Click to expand...
Yes, but the main stipulation of JHP is that it MUST sufficiently penetrate through whatever it needs to first (arm bone, chest bone, etc.) in order to reach vitals. Do you think a bullet that goes 12" in gel (12" in gel is not gonna do 12" in a body), so probably 10" in a body, will penetrate through Thor's arm and them make it to vitals? I mean, in the pic, it looks like Manny Pacquiao could literally fit inside Thor, and still be less than half his torso thickness. Expansion does not come before adequate penetration.
 
"...Goliath was killed because he was shot in the head..."

Nope. Traumatic skull fracture caused by a severe blow to the head.
Click to expand...

Just what do you think a sling "bullet" does when it hits the skull??

That has never been proven to actually have occurred.
Click to expand...

Specific to Goliath, no, not "proven" because we don't have his skull to examine. We do, however have many thousands of examples of people's skulls being broken and death resulting from the impact of a projectile, including stones launched from slings.

That is proven, verifiable history.

Got any idea why the opponents of slingers in Roman arenas wore full face helmets? So the slinger wouldn't crack their opponents head open from 30 feet away in the first 10 seconds of the fight. The Romans weren't about "fair" fights, really, but they did want fights to last long enough to be ...entertaining.
 
44 AMP said:
As to penetration "specs" I suggest you look at the 1986 Miami FBI shootout as an example. Not about the actual inches of penetration, but as an example of how a round (a 9mm in that case) MET or exceeded every penetration spec the FBI had at the time, and still was found to "fail" in that shooting.

The bullet that "failed" was a fatal shot, but not an instantly incapacitating one. The bad guy lived about another minute, was mobile, and during that time killed a couple FBI agents and wounded several more. There are, of course a lot more things involved, it was an exceptional case.
Click to expand...

Which specific shot/impact are you referring to?
Side or head?
 
Last edited:
Which specific shot/impact are you referring to?
Click to expand...

I am referring to the 9mm shot that according to some stopped "1/2" short" in the chest. The later shots to his head (.38 or .357 I'd have to look up which) were not blamed as "failures" by the FBI review.

My point is that a "rated" JHP approved, and with a good track record, "failed" due to circumstances unique to the situation. The shooter was an average size guy just VERY determined, and was not stopped by a bullet that "should have".

The official blame was placed on the round, not the exact circumstances of the shot. Which, is something common to bureaucratic systems, choosing a scapegoat unable to dispute their conclusions.
 
OP: You may be looking for a problem that really isn't there. If it were me and my bullet didn't stop a really big guy I would shoot him again.
 
As mentioned, in the wake of the 1986 Miami shootout the FBI was in a bit of a panic to come up with better ammo for their agents than the 9mm and the particular brand of 9mm jhp that ammo that they were using. They figured that the bullet had not penetrated deeply enough so they experimented with that and settled on the 10mm as it met their goals for penetration. They had issues with this and switched to 40 S&W soon after it became available as it performed as they wanted. No 9mm jhp ammo at that time performed as they wanted.

Three major things of benefit to handgunners came out of this:

1. The widespread adoption of 10% (and 20%) calibrated ballistic gel as a universal testing media for bullets.

2. The adoption by the FBI of a set of standard Protocol for bullet performance in 10% ballistic gel for penetration and expansion both before and after penetrating various barriers. Any ammo up for duty use by the FBI must meet those standards. These standards became widely used in law enforcement in the U.S. and internationally. They are known as the FBI Protocol.

3. The FBI's search for new bullets set off a race among ammo manufacturers to improve bullet design. That competition improved bullet design and the reliability of jhp ammo and influenced other designs as well. Across calibers bullet design and performance has improved. That competition has not stopped.

You can see the FBI Protocol (or standards) here:

http://www.brassfetcher.com/FBI Ammunition Protocol/FBI Ammunition Protocol.html

The standard set for 12 to 16" inches of penetration with expansion was set with the experience that many persons are shot while running, bent over, crouching or laying down. In these cases a bullet may strike a person in the shoulder and travel into the stomach or chest cavity before hitting a vital organ. A bullet may pass through the right bicep into the right side of the chest, across the chest and exit at the left shoulder, or stop in the heart. That was a consideration based on experience that they looked at. They wanted a bullet design that could do this penetration with expansion.

The FBI Protocols did set a new standard for defensive bullet design and performance. One that ammo manufacturers competed to meet and by so doing have improved the performance and reliability of jhp ammo.

tipoc
 
OP: You may be looking for a problem that really isn't there. If it were me and my bullet didn't stop a really big guy I would shoot him again.
Click to expand...

The above is right.

It also doesn't matter big or small.

Never count on a one shot stop. Instead assume that you'll shoot a fella 2, 3 or more times and won't see any effect. Assume that and act accordingly. That way you won't be surprised when it does happen. Be surprised when you shoot a guy in the head and they do go down.

tipoc
 
44 AMP said:
I am referring to the 9mm shot that according to some stopped "1/2" short" in the chest. The later shots to his head (.38 or .357 I'd have to look up which) were not blamed as "failures" by the FBI review.
Click to expand...
Ive seen both shots used as examples to be "critical" of x or y which is I was asking for clarification.

My point is that a "rated" JHP approved, and with a good track record, "failed" due to circumstances unique to the situation. The shooter was an average size guy just VERY determined, and was not stopped by a bullet that "should have".
Click to expand...
Except for the fact that the bullet didn't fail, not in any way shape or form.
It struck the guy in the bicep, traveled through 8" of flesh, fat, muscle, etc, and expanding along the way.
It exited, then entered his chest expanded and sideways, continuing another 8".
I would say it performed perfectly.

The official blame was placed on the round, not the exact circumstances of the shot. Which, is something common to bureaucratic systems, choosing a scapegoat unable to dispute their conclusions.
Click to expand...
Correct
The only real "failure" that day was that of the agents to be prepared and to not underestimate their quarry.
The reality is they had their rear ends handed to them in spectacular fashion.
Thats not me ripping on them, just a simple reality.

If one looks at the shots taken, one will quickly see that the majority of hits were poorly/ineffectively placed, and the majority simply missed.
Which goes back to my mantra of...
Practice
Placement
Penetration
Each trumping things like the much overrated expansion.

All the gimmicky boutique bullets in the world will not supersede simply mastering ones weapon, ones self, ones situation.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top