wild cat mccane
New member
Both HK and Walther use their 4" recoil spring assemblies from their 4" barreled slides as their 4.5", 5" and 5.25" (VP9 Match).
I read on the HK forum that the VP9 Match and VP9L was a cheap move by HK for having not created a full RSA.
I read praise for Walther's ingenuity and simplicity for using the same RSA between all the PDPs.
So technically speaking, they both have lightened their longer slides to make the guns behave the same, but dwell time in the barrel is longer.
Technically speaking, is their an advantage to NOT sharing the same guide rod/spring assembly? Or totally doesn't matter?
I read on the HK forum that the VP9 Match and VP9L was a cheap move by HK for having not created a full RSA.
I read praise for Walther's ingenuity and simplicity for using the same RSA between all the PDPs.
So technically speaking, they both have lightened their longer slides to make the guns behave the same, but dwell time in the barrel is longer.
Technically speaking, is their an advantage to NOT sharing the same guide rod/spring assembly? Or totally doesn't matter?