HK USP's vs. Sig - Shooting Impressions

J.T.King

New member
Hello!

I am a new participant on this forum, and yesterday I wrote a long article on my shooting impressions of several high quality pistols for rec.guns for fun.

Maybe some folks here would enjoy it!

As I was in the market for a larger caliber, high quality pistol I
spent a day at the range putting several hundred rounds through 3
USP's and a Sig Sauer P220 (.45cal).

Before I start... I came into this testing session pretty convinced
that I was going to get either a Sig in .40 or a USP in .40. Here are
my impressions:

*****HK USP45*****
This was the first pistol I shot along side the HK USP40 for a side by
side comparison of the two calibers in what is essentially the same
gun. I found the accuracy of the .45 to be quite good at the ranges I
fired which were 15ft, 25ft, and 50ft.

The weapon I was using was a range rental that the range opperator
said had about 15,000 rnds through it. It never misfired and seemed to
fit my hand pretty well, especially considering that I do not have
overly large hands and this is a pseudo doublestack .45cal.

I was expecting it to be a handful recoil wise but it was surprisingly
mild mannered. It pushed me good but never with that hard snap that
the 1911's seem to have. Apparently the "recoil reduction" system they
have with a double recoil spring works. Smooths out the felt recoil.
An armorer at a local gun store said it "lengthens the recoil pulse"
spreading the same force over about 30% more time, softening the blow.
Whatever... It seems to work.

I was able to line up the sights with both eyes open quite easily as
the two rear sight posts are far enough apart that the prominent front
sight was easily positioned with both eyes open. The gun felt solid,
the mechanical pieces were all still not sloppy and I felt that the
weapon was marginally more accurate than me at ranges out to 50ft.

The controls were pretty nice. I liked that the mechanical safety
doubled as a decocking lever. I was a little concerned that the manual
safety might be accidentally flicked on in a preasure situation
because it is on the frame, not high up on the slide.. but no matter
how I picked the gun up off the table I never mangagted to
accidentally set it. All in all, this seemd like a durable, well
constructed weapon that performed quite admirably; I liked it.


*****HK USP40*****
I fired this WITH the USP45; alternating magazines at side by side
targets. The first *very* surprising difference I noticed was that
this .40cal pistol had harsher recoil than the .45cal!! I was shocked.
I can only surmise that the few oz's less weight and the higher
velocity .40cal rounds combine to give this a sharper recoil. It did
not so much "push" my hand as it "twisted" fast in it.

Again, I am not a huge handed guy, and I am 5' 11", 170lbs... So
neither of these guns had "punishing" recoil by any means. But my wife
will shoot the .45cal better. Her hands are the exact same size as
mine (long fingers) and she has problems with high recoil, light
weight guns more than slower recoil ones.

The second thing that surprised me was that the .40 was NOTICEABLY
less accurate than the .45cal. I really thought I was doing something
wrong. So I put an extra magazine or two through it but at every range
and every type of fire that I did (slow fire, quick fire, double
action/single action groups, 25ft two eyes open, etc...) the .45cal
outshot the .40cal. Sometimes by a lot. At 25ft, slow fire, being as
accurate as I could be, I put all ten rounds of .45cal into a 2"
circle. The .40 was 5" with a flyer (my fault). MAybe this gun wasnt a
great specimen but others have told me that the .40cal is not as
accurate a cartrige as the .45..... Dont pretend to know, but this
specimen sure wasnt!

The controls are all similar and felt nice with one very important
difference. Twice I accidentally engaged the safety picking the gun up
off the table very quickly for a double action shot. Perhaps my grip
is at fault, but there is not a lot of leeway here for your thumb to
ride up without engaging that safety. Otherwise the gun felt nice, was
not loose and cycled completely reliably. A good gun, but it had me
rethinking my Caliber choice.


*****Sig P220 .45 cal*****
I own a sig. I own the little .380 auto (P230). I love the pistol. Its
in stainless and I know its essentially a nicely crafted walther clone
but damn its a nice gun! I really like it. So I came into firing the
full frame .45 Sig with a lot of anticipation. I had never fired them
before and I have several Police Officer clients who swear that they
are one of the best handguns made. It did not disappoint.

I chose the .45 to try after my experience with the USP's. At the same
time I fired the HK USP45compact. I'll tell you this much, the Sig is
a nice gun! My first magazine through it at 25ft firing at a medium
pace gave me a group of 1 3/4 inches! For me thats great! I was
stunned. I was not trying to get them all that tight. But round after
round kept going through the bulls eye!

The trigger.... oh the Sig trigger.... I know this gun has had many
rounds through it (range controller said about 20,000) but that double
action trigger was the smoothest and quickest I have ever felt. No big
"last bit" to get over. It just fired with the slightest hesitation to
let you know you were about to drop the hammer. Single action was
equally as snappy. I had a smile on my face!

But not about the controls. The slide release is hard to disengage and
if when I did it with my right hand thumb, the ridges on the slide
scraped my thumb as the slide went forward. I know the wife wont like
that. Plus it is doubtful she will even be able to disengage it. The
decocker was surprisingly light, considering that the decocker on our
P230 is hellishly stiff. It sure breaks down easy though.

Now one of my main gripes about the gun... It has only a 7 round
magazine. I know the M1911 has only seven rounds, but that remains one
of my principal compaints about it. The HK USP45 has a 12 round clip!
(not in my state tho.... 10rnd max). Heck, even the *compact* USP45
has eight rounds! Seems to me a nice pistol to shoot but becasue of
the dificulty in releasing the slide and the lower capacity magazine,
it just didnt seem like as nice a choice anymore.

Recoil was a little tougher than on the USP for all that the sig is a
slightly heavier gun (if I recall correctly). Again, the USP gets
points for their recoil reduction system. It actually seems to work as
billed. I was kinda disappointed that I found flaws with the Sig as I
was really leaning that way coming into this. Still... I would like to
own this gun!


*****HK USP45 compact*****
What a great concept! Make a compact .45 with more capacity than a
1911, able to carry cocked and locked, decocker lever, and rounded off
controls! but with small size comes compromises and I didnt
particularily care for the ones made here.

I have one heck of a blood blister from slamming part of my palm home
with a new clip. While the grip does allow for a tight three finger
hold (as opposed to 2 finger), the third finger is on the magazine
lip. and the meat of your palm (below your pinky finger) hangs below
the magazine well. If you are not careful, PINCH!

Recoil was noticeably sharper. More that tne full size .40, .45, or
sig. I got both a heavy push, and a twisting snap on each round.
Again, not "punishing" to an average size man, but it was a little
distracting and I doubt I would feel comfortable handing this pistol
off to my 5'5", 120lb wife.

Controls were USP tight, but that issue with the safety was even more
a concern. Althoguh I never accidentally engaged it (having learned on
the .40cal) I did have to positin my thumb lower than I am accostomed
to. Perhaps that contributed to my medicore shoting with the gun. Not
as bad as the full sized .40cal but no where near the USP45, much less
the Sig 220.

A cute gun, and a very well made .45 compact. I would much rather fire
this one than a lot of those "compact" .45's that look like .25 cals,
thats for sure. It also performed flawlessly like all these guns but
it was only marginally fun to shoot and after my hand started
throbbing from the blood blister I was glad the day was about over.


PRO's and CON's

*****HK USP45 (full sized)*****
PRO: Well made, solid weapon with good accuracy and great controls.
easy to fire with both eyes open, seems virtually indestructable with
large, easy to opperate parts. Recoil is surprisingly light, lighter
than the .40cal and the 10rnd magazine of .45cal is quite sweet!
CON: Its big, its bulky. No way can I conceal this baby. The trigger
guard is so large most holsters wont fit it.

*****HK USP40 (full sized)*****
PRO: Well made, durable .40cal that is a surprisingly light weight gun
for a full sized combat auto. It fires the .40cal which, IMHO, is a
very nice compromie round for a handgun. Controls are easy to opperate
but the 10 rnd magazine makes you wish you could get the 13 rounders
the Law Enforcement personnel can get.
CON: Sharp, harsh recoil as compared to USP45. Larger hands may find
avoiding the frame mounted safety to be too distracting. Crap accuracy
(although that may have just been this gun).

*****Sig P220 .45cal *****
PRO: amazing trigger, very accurate pistol. Finely machined, well
executed design. Its hard to imagine not using a gun like this for
most law enforcement tasks and home defense. It shoots so nice it
makes you want to practice! Easy to take apart.
CON: hard to opperate controls. Only a 7 round magazine. No manual
safety. It is finely machined and that makes me not really want to
take it camping. Only seven rounds. Most armorers have said "dont get
it too dirty!" Only seven rounds... (have I mentioned that already?)

*****HK USP45 compact *****
PRO: shares good controls with the USP. You can actually get 8 rounds
in a compact .45cal! Three finger grip, pretty easy to shoot with both
eyes open. Snag free versions of the full sized controls and a bobbed
for concealed carry.
CON: It bit me! Recoil is a bit sharp, accuracy is middle of the road,
I dont carry concealed so the tapered controls arent a plus for me,
the hammer is bobbed and so you cant cock it without pulling back on
the slide.

FINAL CONCLUSIONS

Well... after all was said and done I was convinced. I was about to go
back to the .45cal after 6 years of being a "Forty" man. I loved the
feel of the Sigs action, but my wife needs to be able to opperate the
controls. I put the USP 45 in her hand and she did a full functions
check without a sweat. In her words, "Thats not as bad as I thought!"

The .40cal USP disappointed me. The USP45 compact just didnt fit me
but I think it is a great gun for the right hand. The Sig was so fun
to shoot I want one, but it doesnt fit my current requirements for
home defense and remote camping well enough to buy.

What clinched it was that my gun range had a sale on their USP's
offering the four that they had new in the box to the public at their
law enforcement prices. There was a new .45 fullsized HK USP45 for
only $619. I bought it.


DISCLAIMER
I am no expert, just an ex-GI who likes to shoot pistols and believes
that excercising my second ammendment rights is an important component
of keeping them. I do not mean to rain on anyones pet gun here, just
giving strictly my impressions after spending an afternoon with four
of the best made pistols in the world.

I hope you guys get some use out of this article! Please give me
feedback on this good or bad. This is the second long winded post I
have ever written(the first
being on the S&W titanium .38special 5shot holdout revolver) and I
kinda like doing them if you guys like to read them.

Thanks!

J.T.
 
Welcome J.T.! You have made some very astute observations, which no doubt will be helpful to others. The two of us have had very similar experiences with the firearms mentioned. In a year's time, I have gone from the 1911 to the Glock 21, to the SIG 220, to the USP .45f, and now back again to the 1911. I just plain do my best with a 1911 pattern pistol, therefore I have the most confidence with it. All are excellent, inherently accurate, reliable(yes,even the 1911)and powerful. You are doubly successful in having found a gun that both you and your wife can shoot comfortably! Good luck and thanks for the informative, interesting post.

------------------
semper ubi sub ubi
 
First off, thanks for the post. It's informative, and reminds me of the research I did before purchasing my own USP45f. That Sig 220 in the case was handled and adored, but in the end, the USP45 won out.

Also, you'd be surprised what you can conceal with the right clothing. In the beginning, I swore that I would never conceal the USP effectively, but in time, I found that an IWB holster (or none at all) and dark colored, stiff material shirts would allow me to carry this with only jeans (or belted 'dockers') and a polo shirt. I'm about the same body build as you are, 5'11", 165, so we're in similar conditions as far as concealed carry. Give it a try before you dismiss it.

Now, onto the search for good range holsters... My recommendation is the Bianchi 19L-paddle - a lined leather paddle holster with thumb break designed specifically for the USP45f. Others say the holsters designed for the 9mm and .40 USP will work, but I have no experience there. Best to get what's designed from the start. Best of luck, and thanks again for the thread,
 
If you must got for an HK for carry, get decocker-only "safety" group...I found the HK and Beretta 92 with safeties on when I didn't want them to be on "safe" (I call it "disabled") HK safety can be applied by accident when dropping the slide using slide stop lever, 92 safety when racking.

------------------
Oleg "cornered rat" Volk (JPFO,NRA)

http://dd-b.net/RKBA
 
SIG Sauers will function just fine dirty. I know plenty of people that have dragged their P226 through mud and dirt withput a single problem.

Seven rounds is no handicap. The overwhelming majority of shootings end in 2 or 3 rounds. I think that fewer rounds make you a more judicious shooter as you learn to do more with less.

------------------
So many pistols, so little money.
 
I would agree that 7 rounds in a 1911 is no slouch, by any means, but 'do more with less' is the last thing I want to be thinking about in a defensive situation.

The market price of standard capacity magazines for the USP45 (12-rounds) is high, but the added piece of mind is well worth it, IMO. Trying to avoid the legality questions re: these mags, make the decision for yourself and be comfortable with what you carry. The USP offers capacity that only the Para Ord can beat.
 
J.T.,
Thanks for the well written post.
I have been considering the HK and Sig in .45 as well. I have pretty much counted out the Sig now b/c the HK feels better in my hand. Unfortunately, I haven't yet found anywhere near me where I can rent a USP. :(
I may end up buying it untried, relying on the reviews of people like yourself. Thanks
 
Nice post. I did the same type of test a few years back. I own many Sigs and to me they're the hot ticket. I was interested in the HK USP's to add to the collection so I looked into them. They felt okay in the hand at the stores, the grip was a little on the fat side and I don't care for plastic guns much at all. However from what I read they seemed to be tough and well-tested.

I went to the range and they had a .40 and .45 USP so I rented them and shot them. I was not pleased at all. I was pleased that I didn't buy the guns without trying them, would have been a very expensive lesson. Neither gun was as accurate as any of my Sigs and I had abrasions in the web of my hand from the rough surface of the grips. So, I obviously didn't buy them but I came away with a good lesson of trying before buying.

If you want to shoot an accurate .40, try the Sig P229. It's soft-shooting, extremely accurate, mine is anyway, and it surprisingly can shoot along my Sig P220 which is also very, very accurate.

8 round magazines are available for the P220 in addition to the 7 rounders. I don't judge a gun on how many rounds it holds because I'd rather that it be durable and reliable as well as accurate and ergonomic.

The 1911 has 7-8 round mags (discounting the Para's of course) and no one complains too much about that. The P220 is about the same weight as an USP, both are lighter than a 1911. USP 12 round mags go for over $125, not worth it IMHO for 2 extra rounds. The PC 10 round mags that come with the gun only give you 2 more rounds, not worth it with that big fat grip; I'd stick with a single stack.

As far as the controls go, I'm surprised that you had a problem with the Sig's. I actually prefer the slide stop where it is because on the USP and 1911's the slide stop is so far forward that for me to use it I have to shift the gun in my hand.

Female friends of mine actually like it better because they have an easier time locking the slide back. But, if you like to shoot high thumbs or if you're used to the customary location above the trigger, the Sig isn't the gun for that.

It just goes to show that what one likes, someone else may not. Thus, absolutely essential to try out a gun before buying to save yourself some money and frustration. Guns are a personal thing and I think the most important thing you can do is to plain and simply have a dependable one when you need it, regardless of what brand it is.
 
I had a full size HK USP .45. A great gun, but too big IMO. As for twelve rounds, try to find them outside of LEO circles.

The compact HK USP .45 is the way to go in the USP line up, if you ask me. I also like the .40, if you must have the capacity.

220s are great guns. I have never owned one, but am getting around to it. I have put 300-400 rounds through one though, and have no complaints.

1911s are the way to go. My bias. Doesn't have to ne yours.

8 or 9 rounds is never a disadvantage to a well trained person with a spare magazine. NEVER.

Erik
 
Greetings J.T.; I can see from your post that
you are both; a gentlemen and a scholar.
Welcome aboard here at TFL. Now, getting
to thought's and consideration's of all
the weapons you tested: You made some
very intelligent observations; with that
said, and being the proud owner of both
an H&K USP (full size) .45ACP and a Sig-
Sauer P220A in .45ACP; qualifies me to at
least offer my $.02 cent's worth. First off;
I must tell you, if you opt for the Sig P220
don't expect that great double action trigger; cuz' it just isn't going to
be there on a NIB Sig w/standard blue
finish. However, the two-tone models seem
to be a bit "slicker" from the factory.
Otherwise, a very fine firearm; even with
the seven round magazine's. Very reliable,
even in sub zero weather conditions. Currently in use my major law enforcement
agencies and militaries world wide. :D

Now, to the H&K USP's: Rank and file, they
rate right up there with the Sig's. Variant
#1- (My choice), offer's the traditional
double action/single action with a safety
and a decocker. These are feature's most
preferred by today's shooter's. Reliable,
Durable, and Accurate best describe this
firearm. H&K is a good company; but may
soon be taken over by Colt. :( H&K hi-cap
magazines are terribly expensive; anywhere
from approximately $125 to $175 each; depending on where you find them? :( Yes,
that's right; I have seen one dealer whose
name I won't mention, with price's as high
as $175.00 each!!! :mad:

Service and Warranty Repair: SigArms is second to NONE!!! :D Great folks, that
do appreciate your business. :) H&K just
plain stinks. Service is lousy; taking
MUCH longer than any other manufacturer;
to do warranty repair work.

Finish: The nod here goes to the H&K USP's;
with their "Hostile Environment" finish. I
often say, "if Sig could duplicate the fine
Tennifer finish of Glock's; then there would
not be much of a market for any other handgun". :D Sig's do lack a little with
their standard finish'es.

EPILOG: Both are excellent choice's. For me,
I've been relying on the Sig-Sauer P220A
since 1988; it has NEVER let me down, therefore I don't see any need to change.
I do use the H&K USP for a "home defense"/
range firearm; one of many!!!! :) Hope this
helps some; and have a great day. :D

Best Wishes,
Ala Dan, N.R.A. Life Member/Former LEO

Message edited by Dan H. Ford on 03-08-00
 
Hey guys!

Thanks for the enthusiastic response! Heck, only two people responded to the exact same post on rec.guns and that goes all over the world!

Some comments and questions:

LongDuck - I am, in fact, looking for a good holster. These are my criteria for the HK USP45 that I bought: 1)must have a retaining strap, 2)must be able to be easily attached and removed from a belt of non-belted pants, 3)must be durable enough in construction and finish to be bounced around in a cj5 off road and in dirty, dusty, desert camping conditions. Do you have any other suggestions?

Oleg - that issue with the safety that you mentioned did bother me a bit on the smaller frame 40f and the 45c... I personally never had a problem with the 45f even though I "tried" to accidentaly engage it. But the main issue here is that my wife wants a manual safety on the pistol. All of our other autos do not have one and she wants this one to.

Tecolote - well, maybe I am just a paranoid, but I am not completely convinced of either my skill under life-threatening stress nor of any pistol's ability to stop an agresive opponent so I admit to a bias towards "more-bigger" bullets in my guns. Basically I do not want to waste my government sanctioned 10 bullet allotment on a smaller bullet than I have to unless I truly cant shoot the gun well or the wife cant opperate it safely.

Ala Dan - I have heard the same thing that you mentin about HK's service (or complete lack thereof). Maybe a purchase of them by Colt would be a good thing there? Also, you mention HK USP45f pre-ban standard cap (12 rd) mags as if you know places that actually sell them...

Could you enlighten me? I have a post on the Accessories forum about it but no responses...

Thanks again to everyone for their warm welcome! (far nicer than some of the jackasses on rec.guns that seem to want to yell at you over any slight misuse of a term or the slightest display of a lack of total knowledge...)

nice to be here!

J.T.
 
As far as engaging the safety while racking the slide, while it is something that can occur, I think it'd be a rare occurence if you grip the slide right when racking it. At least HK put the safety where it should be, on the frame, as opposed to on the slide like Beretta.

HK is known for having some really crappy, almost non-existent customer service. Colt supposedly was supposed to buy HK but I don't think it went through or will go through. Not to start a flame war with Colt devotees, but if Colt were to buy HK, that would be a very bad thing. They supposedly stated that they would stop civilian sales of HK guns except for LE and military. Colt is an anti-gun company for you and me, only cares about gov contracts, and has a record of contributing to anti-gun organizations and people; go figure.

HK USP .45 12-round magazines do exist, but like Ala Dan and I said, they cost over $125; again, not worth it IMHO. Pick up a copy of Shotgun News and/or Gunlist. They have dealers and places in there that advertise such mags at those prices. LE and military gets the restricted ones for about $40 a pop, but for civies, it's the outrageous $125+.
 
Back
Top