Hee hee http://www.worldnetdaily.com/bluesky_lamb/19991109_xchla_hillary_cr.shtml
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>
By Henry Lamb
© 1999 WorldNetDaily.com
Where was the mainstream news media when Hillary
Clinton introduced Walter Cronkite to the World
Federalist Association on Oct. 19? Television cameras
focused on Hillary's baseball cap; it is far more
important that voters know where she stands on the
issue of national sovereignty. Not until WorldNetDaily
reported the Cronkite speech Nov. 30, did Americans
discover that both Hillary and Walter are avid
advocates of world government.
Cronkite says, "democracy, civilization itself, is at
stake," unless the "basic structure of our global
community" is changed in the next few years. Cronkite's
appeal for world government came only five days
before the release of the Charter for Global Democracy
which embodies the version of world government
preferred by the United Nations Association.
Both the UNA and the WFA have been promoting
world government for years. Cronkite's group, the
WFA, prefers a "federalist" system which would create
a weighted system of voting in the U.N. General
Assembly to create a legislative body roughly akin to the
American Congress. The UNA prefers a "consensus"
process that takes into account recommendations
offered by civil society (non-government organizations
accredited by the U.N.).
Both organizations want to elevate the U.N. to world
government status and empower the U.N. to enforce all
international law. In fact, in 1986, the WFA filed suit
against the United States over U.S. foreign policy,
arguing that Article VI of the U.S. Constitution made the
U.N. Charter as well as other U.N. treaties, the
"supreme law of the land." The courts ruled against the
WFA in 1989.
Hillary's presence at the WFA meeting, and her
introduction of Cronkite, directly aligns her with the
world government movement, and particularly with the
WFA's world government aspirations.
Cronkite called for the "revision" and limitation of the
veto power of permanent members of the U.N. Security
Council. The Commission on Global Governance and
the Charter for Global Democracy call for the
elimination of both the veto and permanent member
status on the Security Council. This latter
recommendation will be presented as the needed
"reform" to the Millennium Assembly next September.
Cronkite's more timid approach, as well as his
"federalism" ideas have been overwhelmed by the
U.N.'s "consensus" process now on a fast track toward
adoption.
Cronkite called for the immediate ratification of a
laundry list of U.N. treaties, including the infamous
Convention on the Rights of the Child; the Convention
on the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination Against
Women (CEDAW); and, "most important," Cronkite
says, the International Criminal Court, which empowers
the U.N. to prosecute American citizens whether or not
it is ratified by the Senate.
Hillary made her support for these positions clear when
she attended the U.N. Beijing Conference on Women in
1995.
Cronkite said in order to achieve world government,
"Americans will have to yield up some of our
sovereignty." He said, "the notion of unlimited national
sovereignty means international anarchy."
Under the world government scheme embodied in the
Charter for Global Democracy, any individual nation
could wield only the power assigned to it by the U.N.
National armies would be disarmed to the level of a
national police force. The U.N. would maintain a
"directly recruited" standing army under the direct
authority of the U.N. Secretary-General. Private citizens
would be disarmed, and the U.N. would control the
manufacture, sale, licensing and distribution of all
firearms.
To finance this expanded world government, the U.N.
would be given the authority to impose taxes on the
exchange of currency, on the use of resources, including
the air, outer space, and the seas. Taxing authority is
seen not only as the source of unlimited revenue, but
also as a way to force a reduction of natural resources,
especially fossil fuels, water, trees, and minerals.
Like the Clinton administration, and other world
government advocates, Cronkite demeans opponents.
He says that like America's rejection of the League of
Nations, current opposition to world government is "led
by a handful of willful senators who choose to pursue
their narrow, selfish political objectives at the cost of our
nation's conscience."
He goes even further to single out the "Christian
Coalition and the rest of the religious right wing" as the
culprits who have kept the world in a state of sovereign
anarchy and prevented the emergence of a "civilized
force of law" administered by the United Nations.
The fact that people of the stature of Hillary Clinton and
Walter Cronkite are now willing to publicly advocate
world government is an indication of their confidence
that the world is now ready to accept their plan. World
government is no longer the exclusive domain of the
"black helicopter crowd." Finally, the sinister plans to
rule the world are being exposed by those who expect
to rule.
The timeline is, indeed, short. After decades of silent
and denied preparation, the United Nations has made
public the millennium year agenda which is crowned by
the largest gathering of heads of state in the history of
the world next September.
World government, called "global governance" by the
U.N., will not occur on any certain day. It is a process
that has been underway for years. The Millennium
Assembly and summit next September, with the
adoption of the Charter for Global Democracy, is seen
to be the point from which there is no turning back.
The only way to stop world government at this late date,
is for the American people to send a government to
Washington in the next election that can muster the
courage to just say, "No."
Henry Lamb is the executive vice president of the
Environmental Conservation Organization and
chairman of Sovereignty International.
[/quote]
------------------
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes" RKBA!
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>
By Henry Lamb
© 1999 WorldNetDaily.com
Where was the mainstream news media when Hillary
Clinton introduced Walter Cronkite to the World
Federalist Association on Oct. 19? Television cameras
focused on Hillary's baseball cap; it is far more
important that voters know where she stands on the
issue of national sovereignty. Not until WorldNetDaily
reported the Cronkite speech Nov. 30, did Americans
discover that both Hillary and Walter are avid
advocates of world government.
Cronkite says, "democracy, civilization itself, is at
stake," unless the "basic structure of our global
community" is changed in the next few years. Cronkite's
appeal for world government came only five days
before the release of the Charter for Global Democracy
which embodies the version of world government
preferred by the United Nations Association.
Both the UNA and the WFA have been promoting
world government for years. Cronkite's group, the
WFA, prefers a "federalist" system which would create
a weighted system of voting in the U.N. General
Assembly to create a legislative body roughly akin to the
American Congress. The UNA prefers a "consensus"
process that takes into account recommendations
offered by civil society (non-government organizations
accredited by the U.N.).
Both organizations want to elevate the U.N. to world
government status and empower the U.N. to enforce all
international law. In fact, in 1986, the WFA filed suit
against the United States over U.S. foreign policy,
arguing that Article VI of the U.S. Constitution made the
U.N. Charter as well as other U.N. treaties, the
"supreme law of the land." The courts ruled against the
WFA in 1989.
Hillary's presence at the WFA meeting, and her
introduction of Cronkite, directly aligns her with the
world government movement, and particularly with the
WFA's world government aspirations.
Cronkite called for the "revision" and limitation of the
veto power of permanent members of the U.N. Security
Council. The Commission on Global Governance and
the Charter for Global Democracy call for the
elimination of both the veto and permanent member
status on the Security Council. This latter
recommendation will be presented as the needed
"reform" to the Millennium Assembly next September.
Cronkite's more timid approach, as well as his
"federalism" ideas have been overwhelmed by the
U.N.'s "consensus" process now on a fast track toward
adoption.
Cronkite called for the immediate ratification of a
laundry list of U.N. treaties, including the infamous
Convention on the Rights of the Child; the Convention
on the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination Against
Women (CEDAW); and, "most important," Cronkite
says, the International Criminal Court, which empowers
the U.N. to prosecute American citizens whether or not
it is ratified by the Senate.
Hillary made her support for these positions clear when
she attended the U.N. Beijing Conference on Women in
1995.
Cronkite said in order to achieve world government,
"Americans will have to yield up some of our
sovereignty." He said, "the notion of unlimited national
sovereignty means international anarchy."
Under the world government scheme embodied in the
Charter for Global Democracy, any individual nation
could wield only the power assigned to it by the U.N.
National armies would be disarmed to the level of a
national police force. The U.N. would maintain a
"directly recruited" standing army under the direct
authority of the U.N. Secretary-General. Private citizens
would be disarmed, and the U.N. would control the
manufacture, sale, licensing and distribution of all
firearms.
To finance this expanded world government, the U.N.
would be given the authority to impose taxes on the
exchange of currency, on the use of resources, including
the air, outer space, and the seas. Taxing authority is
seen not only as the source of unlimited revenue, but
also as a way to force a reduction of natural resources,
especially fossil fuels, water, trees, and minerals.
Like the Clinton administration, and other world
government advocates, Cronkite demeans opponents.
He says that like America's rejection of the League of
Nations, current opposition to world government is "led
by a handful of willful senators who choose to pursue
their narrow, selfish political objectives at the cost of our
nation's conscience."
He goes even further to single out the "Christian
Coalition and the rest of the religious right wing" as the
culprits who have kept the world in a state of sovereign
anarchy and prevented the emergence of a "civilized
force of law" administered by the United Nations.
The fact that people of the stature of Hillary Clinton and
Walter Cronkite are now willing to publicly advocate
world government is an indication of their confidence
that the world is now ready to accept their plan. World
government is no longer the exclusive domain of the
"black helicopter crowd." Finally, the sinister plans to
rule the world are being exposed by those who expect
to rule.
The timeline is, indeed, short. After decades of silent
and denied preparation, the United Nations has made
public the millennium year agenda which is crowned by
the largest gathering of heads of state in the history of
the world next September.
World government, called "global governance" by the
U.N., will not occur on any certain day. It is a process
that has been underway for years. The Millennium
Assembly and summit next September, with the
adoption of the Charter for Global Democracy, is seen
to be the point from which there is no turning back.
The only way to stop world government at this late date,
is for the American people to send a government to
Washington in the next election that can muster the
courage to just say, "No."
Henry Lamb is the executive vice president of the
Environmental Conservation Organization and
chairman of Sovereignty International.
[/quote]
------------------
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes" RKBA!