heat treating
Dear Sirs:
American4guns is correct! That mixture of gases in a furnace will carburize low to medium steel - the entire action.
This is far different from adjusting an oxy/acetylene torch to a carbon rich flame, and I'm thoroughly aware of THAT type of hardening!
It takes a furnace with the ENTIRE action being carburized! You do not want the whole Mauser carburized, yes, some are and those are the ones that a drop on the floor will crack the thumb cut out! The reciever ring is the part that you want carburized to a depth that will prevent "set-back."
Let me illustrate this: A man brought his FR8 Mauser action to me - he had lost his cool and wrapped it around a post. It was barreled by me to 6MM REM years ago. The action was twisted, bent, the bolt head broken off but the reciever ring was in tack with the heavy barrel.
The action I first adjudicated to be junk but I used punches, etc., to finally straighten it and it is barreled, with a new bolt, to 25-06! It has been checked for cracks and test fired several times with normal effect.
This action was carburized correctly. The reciever ring was carburized INSIDE!
Gentlemen, I rest my case and this is my last post on this subject; I have one last question to ask! Why, when you find a Mauser action that has been fired thousands of rounds, probably in combat with marginal headspace that upon examination has NO set-back do we try to improve something that has no need of anything done to it but detailing; do we suspect that it will "set-back" later? Turkish and German ammo in 8X57JS was in the 50,000 cup range!
It is aparrent to me that the so called "re-heat-treaters" of Mausers have no real factual knowledge of the sophisticated process!
I repeat; if it has no set-back to start with it can be barreled to any modern caliber without a thought about it developing set-back later?
Added on to that it is impossible to Rockwell the lug area of Mausers - Ackley says, "it's not worth the paper it's printed on." Source: "Handbook For Shooters and Reloaders, Volume II, page 65 to 68."
Fellas, I recommend reading both Volume I and II.
I rest on my posts and this is my final post on this subject!
Rest at peace brothers!
Harry B.