I have an interesting (to me) story to tell.
I went shooting with an older family member who did a lot to get me started shooting. He learned how to shoot with double action revolvers. He doesn't brag, but spoke fondly of his S&W 686 and those rubber Pachmayr grips on them. I had handled/dry fired his 686 years ago and noticed (along with a friend also shooting) that one particular chamber position produced a very heavy trigger pull. But the gentleman hadn't noticed this himself and had continued to shoot well- enlarging the hole in a CD disk at 8 yards (1 inch groups?)
Later we were cleaning and discovered fouling in front of the cylinder. Not the powdery fluffy carbon deposits that can be wiped off, but those annoying rings that really had some *height* to them. We scrubbed it well with a brass brush and handed it back to him. To us, the double action pull was cut in 1/2 at the chamber position. To him, he couldn't tell the difference. Eventually he said, "yeah that feels slick!" just to say something nice.
I'm surprised how insensitive he was to the trigger pull characteristic. How long had he put up with the cylinder face fouling? But I'm more surprised that his shooting continued to do well even so. He had practiced exclusively with double action for years and shoots better with it than SA. He must have mastered a trigger press straight to the rear pretty well. He told me once, "when I start to complain about a trigger, I find it's really my attitude that's the problem". While I don't always agree in the case that there's a hitch/grittiness that needs to be stoned out - It goes to show how much good training/practice can overcome a variety of things. Revolver shooters have often seen the heaviest and longest of trigger pulls already.
I went shooting with an older family member who did a lot to get me started shooting. He learned how to shoot with double action revolvers. He doesn't brag, but spoke fondly of his S&W 686 and those rubber Pachmayr grips on them. I had handled/dry fired his 686 years ago and noticed (along with a friend also shooting) that one particular chamber position produced a very heavy trigger pull. But the gentleman hadn't noticed this himself and had continued to shoot well- enlarging the hole in a CD disk at 8 yards (1 inch groups?)
Later we were cleaning and discovered fouling in front of the cylinder. Not the powdery fluffy carbon deposits that can be wiped off, but those annoying rings that really had some *height* to them. We scrubbed it well with a brass brush and handed it back to him. To us, the double action pull was cut in 1/2 at the chamber position. To him, he couldn't tell the difference. Eventually he said, "yeah that feels slick!" just to say something nice.
I'm surprised how insensitive he was to the trigger pull characteristic. How long had he put up with the cylinder face fouling? But I'm more surprised that his shooting continued to do well even so. He had practiced exclusively with double action for years and shoots better with it than SA. He must have mastered a trigger press straight to the rear pretty well. He told me once, "when I start to complain about a trigger, I find it's really my attitude that's the problem". While I don't always agree in the case that there's a hitch/grittiness that needs to be stoned out - It goes to show how much good training/practice can overcome a variety of things. Revolver shooters have often seen the heaviest and longest of trigger pulls already.