HCI: GUN CONTROL WINS ACROSS THE NATION IN ELECTION 2000

dZ

New member
GUN CONTROL WINS ACROSS THE NATION IN ELECTION 2000
http://www.handguncontrol.org/press/release.asp?Record=39
Issue Plays Pivotal Role in Big Races

(Washington, DC) From Washington State to Michigan to Florida to Missouri, voters across the country elected candidates who made gun control a central
focus of their campaigns. The results of some of the nation's most high-profile races proved that support for commonsense gun laws is not just helpful to a
candidate's success; it can be the deciding factor in a hotly contested race. An examination of several U.S. Senate, House and state races show that gun control is
a winning issue -- and, just as important, opposition to gun control can be a liability.

Victories in support of sensible gun laws included:


The defeat of 8 elected officials and the gun lobby in Handgun Control's "Dangerous Dozen 2000". This list included incumbent U.S. Senator John
Ashcroft of Missouri, incumbent U.S. Senator Spencer Abraham of Michigan, incumbent U.S. Senator Slade Gorton of Washington, U.S.
Congressman Bill McCollum in his bid for the open Senate seat in Florida, incumbent U.S. Congressman Jim Rogan of California, State Representative
Mark Baker in his bid to unseat U.S. Congressman Lane Evans of Illinois, State Representative Jon Porter in his bid for the open Congressional seat in
Nevada, and incumbent U.S. Congressman Matthew Martinez of California, who lost the Democratic primary to a supporter of gun safety. The gun
lobby was also named as part of the "Dangerous Dozen" for its opposition to two state ballot initiatives to close the gun show loophole. Both
Colorado's Amendment 22 and Oregon's Measure 5 passed overwhelmingly, despite heavy spending by the National Rifle Association and local gun
groups to defeat it.

Other U.S. Senate victories by candidates who made support for gun control a centerpiece of their campaigns included Jon Corzine in New Jersey,
Hillary Clinton in New York and Tom Carper of Delaware, all of whom were endorsed by the Handgun Control Voter Education Fund.

In Missouri, State Treasurer Bob Holden triumphed over Congressman Jim Talent in the governor's race. Holden had touted his opposition to
Missouri's Proposition B, a failed 1999 state referendum to allow people to carry hidden handguns in public, and he criticized Talent for his support of
the NRA-sponsored measure.

In California, nine out of HCI's "Dangerous Dozen" of California were defeated in their state-level races, giving a big boost to efforts to enact a
handgun safety license law in the state next year. HCI Chair Sarah Brady taped a series of phone messages for nine California state candidates that were
placed to nearly 100,000 voters in toss-up elections throughout the state. Eight of the nine candidates supported by Mrs. Brady's phone messages won
their elections.

In Colorado, two out of the "Terrible Trio," three pro-gun state legislators targeted by Handgun Control for their pro-gun records, lost their races.
Incumbent State Senator Jim Congrove lost his bid for re-election and State Rep. Penn Pfiffner lost his bid for an open State Senate seat. Both men
consistently voted with the extremist, pro-gun lobby to allow concealed guns in schools and in public. Handgun Control waged a voter education
campaign to expose their records to the people of Colorado.

In Oregon, incumbent State Senator Eileen Qutub lost her bid for re-election. When Qutub began to mislead voters about her opposition to reasonable
gun laws, Handgun Control launched a campaign to educate voters about her pro-gun record.

In Michigan, the NRA targeted incumbent U.S. Congressman Bart Stupak for defeat. In 1999, Stupak - generally a staunch supporter of the gun lobby
-- broke ranks to vote in favor of closing the gun show loophole. The ensuing rift between Stupak and the NRA moved into the national spotlight, when
the NRA's ruthless tactics against him were exposed on national television. Stupak won re-election in his strongly pro-gun district, further proving you
can stand up to the NRA and win.

In other races around the country, candidates in California, Illinois and New Jersey competed with their opponents to prove who was the stronger
supporter of gun control. Most significantly, former Governor George Allen of Virginia publicly reversed his stand on the federal assault weapons ban,
legislation that he had opposed while serving in Congress. In a dramatic about-face, Governor Allen said that he would vote to renew the assault
weapons ban when it comes up for renewal in 2004. Ironically, the National Rifle Association spent $600,000 to get Allen elected to the Senate.

A massive, unprecedented $20 million effort by the NRA to smear Al Gore in key states like Michigan and Pennsylvania was clearly thwarted. The
NRA poured a tremendous amount of resources into these two states, shamefully misrepresenting Gore's record on gun control. Employing scare
tactics of the basest kind, the gun lobby tried to convince sportsmen and women that an Al Gore presidency would result in the confiscation of all
law-abiding citizens' guns. The NRA's efforts were a stunning failure, however, as Vice President Gore carried both states.

"There is no doubt that gun control was a winning issue this year," said Joe Sudbay, political director of Handgun Control. "We spent about $5 million dollars
to educate the voters on candidates' records, to get out the vote for stronger gun laws, and to elect officials who support our views. And we made some great
advances by defeating opponents of gun safety and gaining new allies in public office. The NRA spent four times that amount and what do they have to show
for it? Fewer lawmakers who will carry their water for them in the U.S. Congress and in state legislatures around the nation. Even some of their own candidates
flip-flopped to support our positions."

"This is a whole new ball game," continued Mr. Sudbay. "Our message to lawmakers who oppose us is not only that we will defeat you, we can defeat you."
>>>>>>>>>

me thinks John Ashcroft of the "Dangerous Dozen" has a new job now...

;)

dZ
 
Yep, pure propaganda, but look what Goebbles, Stalin, and Chairman Mao did with propaganda. This kind of garbage needs to be meant head of with irrefutible proof. If they want to continue to lie then it needs to be confronted with something of a harder substance like ash about thirty five inches long. But we who shoot and enjoy it are going to be perceived as yelling sour grapes because we are always trying to refute what is being said about us. It is way past time for one of General Georges quick and dirty run over the enemy offences that they can't possibly defend against. We need to find a way to strongly and diplomatically refute these bast@**s so that we garner public support at their expense. Get your thinking hats on everybody. The way is out there if we can find it and utilize it.
 
Has anyone informed these morons that John Ashcroft isn't going away? In fact he's a shoe-in for the top Law Enforcement Officers position in the nation...


Sounds like a a real think tank, these fellas...

Someone call NASA, let'em know we found those Rocket Scientist they lost...


Fast Eagle
 
John Ashcroft lost Missouri through voter fraud. That being the case, and if HCI wants to claim responsibility for that loss, then I would suggest that HCI Staff assert their Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination and shut their pie-holes.

And, of course, if HCI was panicking over Senator John Ashcroft, then the thought of Attorney-General John Ashcroft should just blow some veins for the little darlin's.

LawDog
 
HCI claims that gun control played a pivotal role in the last election? Maybe I'm wrong, but as near as I can tell, the Democrat party as a whole downplayed gun control as an election issue, because the party leaders finally figured out that making a big deal out of gun control either wouldn't help or would actually hurt. The leftist media joined right in, IMO, placing gun control on the back burner so Gore would not suffer from it.

Of course, deceit is HCI's stock in trade. So, I guess that anybody fool enough to believe its usual propaganda will be fool enough to believe its victory chant.

Still, HCI does make me a little more inclined to believe in aliens, as I ask myself what planet its leadership comes from. ;)

[Edited by jimmy on 12-27-2000 at 10:59 AM]
 
HCI has to give the illusion that they're on a roll. It's the only way to keep their troops motivated and to justify their existence. As for Ashcroft, I hope he uses his new position to smash HCI.
 
I'm confused. Is there some other Pennsylvania they are talking about?

Pro 2nd Senator Santorum was relected in spite of attempts by his Dem challenger to appeal to pro-gun voters. In my home district (11th) the race pro-gun Dem defeated his pro-gun Rep challenger. In the neighboring 10th pro-gun Sherwood defeated a challenge from pro-gun Casey. (Casey's pro-gun pro-life father was the only Dem to get elected governor in this state since the 70's)

The HCI crowd lost the election last spring when the primary was held.

Tom
 
Yeah, thank God anti-gun Al Gore got elected president. Er, that's wrong. What did Bill Clinton say about the presidential election? That the Democrats anti-gun stance lost the election for Al Gore.

Yeah, HCI's right. They won the battle but lost the war. Too bad for them. And, according to MMM, "The Sky is Falling", er, will be falling on New Years Eve with all those evil, conservative gun owners shooting live rounds into the air that are going to fall to the earth and kill all those poor, unsuspecting liberals.
 
NRA-ILA FAX ALERT

Vol. 7, No. 51 12/22/00

"THEY'VE PROBABLY HAD MORE TO DO THAN ANYONE ELSE IN THE FACT WE DIDN'T WIN
THE HOUSE THIS TIME."

These were the words lame-duck President Bill Clinton used to describe NRA
during an interview with Dan Rather that was aired on the CBS program
"Sixty Minutes II" on December 19. Just as Clinton has credited NRA with
the Republican takeover of the U.S. House and Senate in 1994, when Rather
asked Clinton if he thought his "policy as well as personal failures" may
have contributed to President-elect George W. Bush's defeat of Al Gore,
part of Clinton's response included crediting NRA with an enormous amount
of political clout. Clinton stated, "...I don't think there's any doubt
that, in at least five states I can think of, the NRA had a decisive
influence," because of the Association's opposition to a number of the
Clinton-Gore Administration's anti-gun proposals, such as its attack on
gun shows. But Clinton, whose ultimate legacy may be as the President most
challenged when it comes to telling the truth, also continued to try to
convince America that his Administration's gun-ban agenda was something
else. However, Clinton himself signed the 1994 legislation that banned
certain firearms based on their cosmetic appearance, and Gore, his Vice
President, stated support for a ban on affordable handguns, and said
semi-automatic handguns "really have no place in our society." Clinton did
call NRA an "effective adversary," and closed his comments about our
Association by stating, "And they hurt Al Gore"—one of the rare times
we've ever agreed with Bill Clinton.



<snip>
 
Not too long after the Nov. 7th elections, the NRAILA web-site said that 85% of the candidates the NRA supported or indorsed, regardless of party affiliation, won their contests.
 
No more gun control!

There was a message sent by the law abiding gun owners in this country on Nov. 7th. Al Gore was so popular he could not even carry his home state of Tennessee nor Arkansas! We have had enough of Clinton/Gore/HCI and their anti american gun control agenda. HCI seems to be shaking in their boots with the propaganda they are spewing now. We must stay the course if we want to keep any semblance of 2nd amendment rights because the gun grabbers will not go away.
 
Actually, I say LET THEM..... If HCI wants to let people believe this garbage, then fine! Maybe this will get some more politicians to show their true colors on gun-control. We've seen in this last election what REALLY happens when these whackos make gun-control one of their primary planks in the platform, THEY LOSE! Except for some of the more repressed "blue" areas, Americans soundly showed that advocating eliminating a citizen's God-given RIGHT to self-defense was a sure ticket to the unemplyment line.
 
Back
Top