Do any of you fine fellows have any experience with the H&R Sidekick muzzleloaders?
They appear to have the same general features and appearance as the other H&R single shot rifles and shotguns.
I would assume they are made to similar standards resulting in the same quality as the other H&R products, which are usually decent.
I am looking for a fairly inexpensive replacement for my Hawken. My grandfather built it from a DGW kit in '74, and it is time to pass it down to my youngest brother.
H&R has always served me well, but I would like some input, good or bad, if anyone has any to share.
I really prefer the look and feel of a wood stock and a hammer, while retaining a closed breech system that would seem to be more reliable than some of the other low-budget muzzleloaders available.
I'm just tired of toting my '53 Enfeild repro to the deer woods
They appear to have the same general features and appearance as the other H&R single shot rifles and shotguns.
I would assume they are made to similar standards resulting in the same quality as the other H&R products, which are usually decent.
I am looking for a fairly inexpensive replacement for my Hawken. My grandfather built it from a DGW kit in '74, and it is time to pass it down to my youngest brother.
H&R has always served me well, but I would like some input, good or bad, if anyone has any to share.
I really prefer the look and feel of a wood stock and a hammer, while retaining a closed breech system that would seem to be more reliable than some of the other low-budget muzzleloaders available.
I'm just tired of toting my '53 Enfeild repro to the deer woods