I posted a thread on this or similar topic a year or two ago and this is partly to see what's new in the thinking on the subject. A few recent posts got me wondering.
My original thinking was, if you happen across a dangerous animal, what do you do? In other words, when do you shoot? There seems to be very little written on the subject by the old time gunwriters and hunters and what little there is doesn't say much. It seems to be of more interest in Africa than here.
There are dangerous animals in North America, though not so many on the east coast, as far as I can tell. There seems to be more the further west you go. There are bear here in Virginia, though I've only seen them a couple of times. There are elk, too, but I don't know if they are dangerous. Supposedly moose cause more injuries than brown bears but I bet people worry more about the bears. I also suspect that lions are the most dangerous because from all reports, they jump you from behind. Some reports mention that the person attacked defended themselves successfully with a revolver. But what about big animals?
Without getting into caliber (the bigger the better is assumed) or action type, or carry method (a holster is assumed), the question I first had was when you started shooting. Most of the time you might be able to get away (literally) without firing a shot, though this is certainly an instance where merely showing the pistol is going to make any difference. And contact distance strikes me as a little too late. I also suspect no one would actually recommend a pistol where the animals were really dangerous, aside from lions. Some authorities recommend a .44 magnum carbine or a 12-ga. if your aren't hunting. So the question is, then, is a handgun even a realistic possibility for this problem? To be sure, Elmer Keith was happy with his .44 and .41 magnums, though he didn't seem to ever be without even something larger in the backwoods. I know, he told the story of killing a bear when fishing but it didn't sound like it was going his way in the first place. But that is at least one possible answer: shoot when you see it, stop when you are empty.
What would you do?
My original thinking was, if you happen across a dangerous animal, what do you do? In other words, when do you shoot? There seems to be very little written on the subject by the old time gunwriters and hunters and what little there is doesn't say much. It seems to be of more interest in Africa than here.
There are dangerous animals in North America, though not so many on the east coast, as far as I can tell. There seems to be more the further west you go. There are bear here in Virginia, though I've only seen them a couple of times. There are elk, too, but I don't know if they are dangerous. Supposedly moose cause more injuries than brown bears but I bet people worry more about the bears. I also suspect that lions are the most dangerous because from all reports, they jump you from behind. Some reports mention that the person attacked defended themselves successfully with a revolver. But what about big animals?
Without getting into caliber (the bigger the better is assumed) or action type, or carry method (a holster is assumed), the question I first had was when you started shooting. Most of the time you might be able to get away (literally) without firing a shot, though this is certainly an instance where merely showing the pistol is going to make any difference. And contact distance strikes me as a little too late. I also suspect no one would actually recommend a pistol where the animals were really dangerous, aside from lions. Some authorities recommend a .44 magnum carbine or a 12-ga. if your aren't hunting. So the question is, then, is a handgun even a realistic possibility for this problem? To be sure, Elmer Keith was happy with his .44 and .41 magnums, though he didn't seem to ever be without even something larger in the backwoods. I know, he told the story of killing a bear when fishing but it didn't sound like it was going his way in the first place. But that is at least one possible answer: shoot when you see it, stop when you are empty.
What would you do?