Handgun load development

bandw1dth

New member
Hello all!

Up till now I've mainly been focusing on turning out quality ammunition that safely goes bang. Both Rifle in 556nato and pistol in 9mm. Getting the techniques down to produce the most consistent and repeatable ammunition possible. When selecting a charge for my specific round I tend to just pick one that's middle of the min and max and load twenty or so up take them to the range, fire them while checking for proper cycling and pressure signs from the cases.

That about as far as I've delved into load development.

At this point I'd like to find a load that my pistol "likes" being as accurate as possible. How exactly does one go about doing that? I've done some reading up on ladder loads and my general understanding is to load five rounds up starting at min and work to max in 0.02gr increments, then fire them and see which charge gives you the tightest groups. Is this correct? Is there a better way? At what point does playing with the OAL come into effect?

Thanks so much for your help guys. And if anyone has any kind of templates or pdfs or just anything they think makes the whole process that much easier, please feel free to share.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Very broad questions. Some generalities apply:

Regardless of how many people say they do it, never start in the middle of a load range. It's safe most of the time, but every once in awhile (twice in my 40 years of loading and shooting) you run into a published load range for which the lightest load is already a maximum load for the gun you are using. It's rare, but it happens. So there is a reason that bottom load is called a "starting" load. It's where you start your load testing and work up to higher charges.

For pressure safety purposes (not accuracy purposes) it is adequate to start with that bottom load and work up in increments of 2% of the maximum load. That's a larger amount of powder in a big cartridge than in a small one, but that's just fine. Larger cartridges use slower powders and have more space for the gas to pressurize, so it takes larger steps to effect the same percent pressure increase. As you work up the loads, watch for pressure signs. If they get noticeable and clear, back off the charge weight 5% and shoot that.

I also recommend you read this for safety reasons.

For accuracy purposes there is more than one load development method. I recommend you read Dan Newberry's OCW method as a good starting point.

Seating depth affects pressure, but not always the way people expect, as the graph below shows. As far as its effect on accuracy, I recommend you read this.

seatingdepthvpressure_zps326eb859.gif
 
If you are loading 9mm on a auto progressive then your powder hopper will throw between +/-.1 and +/-.3 grains, depending on whether it's sugar powder, like TiteGroup, or a corn flake powder like 231. The OAL on full stations will vary at least +/- .003-.005". None of that will matter for shooting inside of 40 yards. Accuracy is bullet and gun based, some guns shoot more accurately with certain bullets. OAL is based on bullet shape, but generally speaking the shorter the OAL for the same charge weight will generate higher pressure and velocity. These 4 different 125 grain bullets are loaded at the same charge weight of 4.2 grains of TiteGroup but OAL is between 1.175" and 1.060" based on bullet shape.

image37275.jpg
 
I agree with Unclenick, there is a reason starting loads are listed. My methods take into consideration an aging set of eyes and a joy of reloading and shooting; I will start at the "starting load" and make up two cylinders full for my revolvers (10 and 12 rounds), two magazines for my semi autos or max. 10 rounds. For my Garand it's 16 rounds and my Ruger bolt gun it's 8 rounds (I shoot a magazine or cylinder full, check target, reload and fire second mag. or cylinder full). This method gives me a better insight as to what the ammo is doing and not my marksmanship. I shoot and record results. Next go-around I'll up the powder charge (depending on the cartridge, .2 to .5 gr.) and load/shoot/record. Continue until I find a promising load and "tweek" the charge up or down by .1 or .2 gr. until I find the "perfect load".

After a powder charge is determined, I can work on OAL, or primer changes, any other component change...

If one is in a hurry, my method will prolly drive them nuts, but like I said, I like reloading...:D
 
You work up hand gun loads the same way you do for a rifle. Beginning with the start load for a given bullet weight and powder, load 5 rounds(there's none of the off the lands nonsense. Really isn't for rifle either until you have a load. That's a load tweaking technique that isn't really necessary.) and go up by 1/10th(.1) of a grain to the max load. Start and Max loads are usually a lot closer than rifle loads.
No progressives or powder throwers. Weigh each load. Keeping 'em separate, of course, and using the MAX OAL for the cartridge regardless of the bullet type or shape. 1.169" for 9mm.
Probably the hardest part of testing handgun loads is having a solid rest. Sand bags still work though. You just hold a bit differently to get a solid as you can. You still shoot for group only, at 7 or 20 yards(depends on what you need and/or have.), slowly and deliberately. Cooling time usually isn't much of a concern, but it doesn't hurt.
 
I get attacked all the time, but TWICE when I started reloading, the START load was at the very least MAX in my gun. Thus, I always check multiple sources and start with the lowest start load.

>At this point I'd like to find a load that my pistol "likes" being as accurate as possible

Well, unless you want to try the "optimum charge" ladder test—where rifle loads start at 300 yards, I would assume pistols would start at 100-150 yards—load development is the same as always:
You start at the starting load and go up by 2% increments or 0.2-0.3gn as a time. Fire a string of 5 shots, retrieve the cases and inspect for pressure signs. If you find a charge that produces a small group, load some on each side and repeat. Don't believe any one target--you need at least five to be sure that it wasn't a fluke and is consistent.
1) It isn't a rifle. It isn't going to give you <1MOA groups. Tricks and OCD actions that may or may not shave a cumulative 0.1" off a group has NO meaning for pistols. You need a good gun, a good bullet, and a good shooter. Load development is usually only about a 1" at 25 yards improvement issue. I have never fired a 6-8" group at 25 yards and, while working up the load, gotten a charge weight that consistently gave me <1.5" groups. A good bullet/powder/gun will fire "roughly" the same groups over the range of powder charges. There will almost always be a BEST zone, but it isn't going to an order of magnitude better.
2) Light loads need fast powders. Heavy loads need slow powders. Low pressure rounds need fast powders. High pressure rounds need slow powders. If you want to work a load down, you move to faster powders.
3) You can ask for loads from others, but that doesn't mean that they will be either accurate or safe in your gun.
4) Take loads in a manual with a grain of salt. All they can be is a guideline. Start low and work up.
Some don't seem to realize it, but chamber pressure is NOT a single number that everyone gets. Pressure varies depending on the gun used, the bullet used, the lot of powder used (this can be very important), the COL used (critical for small "high" pressure rounds like 9x19), and even the cases and primers used.
5) You have to determine the best COL, or, at least, the working COL range, for your gun with EACH bullet. It isn't hard, but manuals generally show what is really a minimum COL. SAAMI industry guidelines for tests calls for test ammunition to use a shorter COL than what will be offered, and I suspect this carries over to load testing for reloaders.
For me, I find that the longest COL that reliably feeds and chambers is the most accurate. Lead bullets often "kiss" the lede/rifling and jacketed bullets are just off by 0.005-0.010".
Here is my little write up for determining COL and finding the cause of any chambering problems:
Per Ramshot:
"SPECIAL NOTE ON CARTRIDGE OVERALL LENGTH “COL”
It is important to note that the SAAMI “COL” values are for the firearms and ammunition manufacturers industry and must be seen as a guideline only.
The individual reloader is free to adjust this dimension to suit their particular firearm-component-weapon combination.
This parameter is determined by various dimensions such as
1) magazine length (space),
2) freebore-lead dimensions of the barrel,
3) ogive or profile of the projectile and
4) position of cannelure or crimp groove.
• Always begin loading at the minimum ‘Start Load.’"

Your COL (OAL) is determined by your barrel (chamber and throat dimensions) and your gun (feed ramp) and your magazine (COL that fits magazine and when the magazine lips release the round for feeding) and the PARTICULAR bullet you are using. What worked in a pressure barrel or the lab's gun or in my gun has very little to do with what will work best in your gun.
Take the barrel out of the gun. Create two inert dummy rounds (no powder or primer) at max COL and remove enough case mouth flare for rounds to chamber (you can achieve this by using a sized case—expand-and-flare it, and remove the flare just until the case "plunks" in the barrel).
Drop the inert rounds in and decrease the COL until they chamber completely. This will be your "max" effective COL. I prefer to have the case head flush with the barrel hood. After this, place the inert rounds in the magazine and be sure they fit the magazine and feed and chamber.
You can also do this for any chambering problems you have. Remove the barrel and drop rounds in until you find one that won't chamber. Take that round and "paint" the bullet and case black with Magic Marker or other marker. Drop round in barrel (or gage) and rotate it back-and-forth.
Remove and inspect the round:
a) scratches on bullet--COL is too long
b) scratches on edge of the case mouth--insufficient crimp
c) scratches just below the case mouth--too much crimp, you're crushing the case
d) scratches on case at base of bullet--bullet seated crooked due to insufficient case expansion (not case mouth flare) or improper seating stem fit
e) scratches on case just above extractor groove--case bulge not removed during sizing. May need a bulge buster.
6) Straightwall cases don't need to be trimmed.
Cases for revolvers that head stamps on the case rim and get roll crimps are often trimmed to uniform length so the roll crimp will be consistent, but I have NEVER found it to matter--not even in my custom PPC revolvers.
Cases for semi-autos that head space on the case mouth should NEVER be trimmed. If you sort your cases by length and shoot them for accuracy, you will almost always find that the longest cases are the most accurate. Again, not by an order of magnitude, but enough. This is REALLY true for 9x19.
So, consistency is important, but you can make things consistently WORSE.
7) After shooting handguns recreationally and competitively for about 40 years, my take on bullets is:
jacketed are best. Cast can be good, particularly if you cast your own. Plated suck
JHPs and L-SWCs are the most accurate, followed by FN, and RN trails in the dust.
If you want really good jacketed bullets, look at Zero Bullets, Montana Gold, and Precision Delta.
If you want really good lead bullets, look at Zero Bullets, Precision Delta, and Precision Bullets (all three produce swaged lead bullets that are as consistent in weight and dimension as jacketed).
Good cast lead can be purchased from mastercastbullets.com, Missouri Bullets, and Penn Bullets.
For all lead bullets, slug you barrel and buy bullets that are AT LEAST 0.001" larger than the actual groove diameter of the barrel.
8) Powders that work great in low pressure cartridges are Bullseye, Red Dot, 231/HP38, and N320. Powders that work well in higher pressure, non-magnum cartridges are Power Pistol, Silhouette, True Blue, Unique, Herco, and BE-86. YMMV

So, Keep It Simple, follow the basics of reloading until you really get your feed wet, and TRY something before you just BELIEVE that it will be better.
 
Last edited:
I read about the ladder, and did work ups in rifle cartridges.
I wrote down all the powder charges and group sizes.
Then I went back to the range and did it again.
No correlation between the two sets of data.
I am not saying I do not believe in the ladder method, but I do believe it is not worth my time.
That may be because I am too crude to benefit from the that refined technique.
That may be because the ladder method is as scientific as a Ouija board.
 
The original write-up I read on the "ladder" test consisted of putting a huge target out at a minimum of 300 yards and firing ONE shot at each charge weight and tracking where each shot hit the target. The idea being that when the barrel harmonics were right, you could fire a range of charge weights into the same "spot."
Today, I keep reading folks calling a "ladder" test the traditional firing 3-5 shot groups while "climbing the ladder" of charge weights.
Not even close to the same idea, and certainly NOTHING new.
I hope my post of at least of some use...
 
IMHO load work up is dictated by function. Bench rest shooting with a rifle? Okay, you're doing some extensive safety and accuracy work up. You want to load 4 or 5k rounds of .223 per year? You're working up for safety, then finding a sweet spot where your powder measure throws accurately and your rifle kind of likes the charge. The most consistent powder measure setting may be a crap load for your rifle, while the best load in your rifle may not measure consistently with your measure. In this example of bulk loading (I understand 5k rounds a year may not be bulk to some, but it is to me), a compromise is warranted. With the exception of safety cannot be compromised. Bulk pistol? I use lights loads for economics to stretch my powder in most loads. That's just me. Using this logic, my load must be capable of noticing no observed difference between soft loads and the pistols "perfect load" when shooting off hand. I don't care if an extra .5 grains of powder will make my rounds 2% more accurate. 2% greater accuracy isn't noticeable with combat style pistol shooting. 357? Well, thats different and closer to rifle in that I want it accurate and powerful enough to take game. Plus no one ever said "I'll buy a 357 and shoot nothing but soft 38s out of it." At least not an American....

I will also parrot what others are saying. Start at the minimum. You can get by with a summary safety work up when you only change one variable like primer or seating depth in an already proven load, not necessarily going back to starting load. For a new powder or projectile load altogether, work it up from the start load.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top