[Here are the two postings on the HCI master plan appended together to form a complete document, except for the fee schedule attachment.]
PLEASE NOTE This is too large for me to fit
into one post.I will try to post the second half as a reply.ernest2)
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 1994 01:04:47 -0800
From: Jeff Chan <chan>
To: ca-firearms, firearms-politics@ns1.rutgers.edu
Subject: More: HCI Master Plan
I now have the cover sheet, addendum & some additional materials
from the HCI master plan circulated earlier. This is not scanned;
I typed it as accurately as possible, including some inconsistencies,
like "fundraiser" vs "fund raiser".
By the way, last count there were about 100,000 paid HCI members.
They supposedly count as members anyone who has called for
information or favorably answered their phone poll.
Additional materials included in the packet I got, but not typed
below include:
1. A fee schedule (what to do with the money from all the
registration & licensing schemes, including legal action against
gun owners),
2. "A Quick Guide to Arguing with the Gun Zealots" (debate points)
First is the distribution sheet:
-----
[appears to be standard letterhead for the Los Angeles office,
stamped: IMPORTANT, CONFIDENTIAL, received 12/30/93; next to
distribution list is handwritten: "UPDATE DIST. LIST!"]
HANDGUN CONTROL HANDGUN CONTROL, INC.
ONE MILLION STRONG...working to National Headquarters
keep handguns out of the wrong hands. 1225 EYE ST., N.W.
Suite 1100
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005
(202) 898-0792 Western Region Office
10951 WEST PICO BLV, ROOM 204
LOS ANGELES, CA 90064
(310) 446-0056
Distribution list cc: Richard Aborn,
David Birenbaum ,Lee Fisher,
Larry Lowenstein, John Phillips,
Helen Raiser, Maurice Rosenblatt,
Jeanne Shields, Odile Stern,
N.T. Shields, Sarah Brady,
Stanley E. Foster,John Hechinger,
Edward O. Welles, Charles J. Orasin,
Lois Hess, Sandy Cooney, Amy Weitz,
[comment: isn't it Edwin Welles? Would someone please look this up?????]
-----
[next the first page, missing from the prior post: note that the address
is slightly different from the page before. Stamped CONFIDENTIAL.]
HANDGUN CONTROL,ONE MILLION STRONG...working to keep handguns out of the wrong hands.
HANDGUN CONTROL, INC.
10951 WEST PICO BOULEVARD,SUITE 201
LOS ANGELES, CA 90064 ;(202) 898-0792
CONFIDENTIAL! NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION!
Notes and Minutes of Meeting of Friday, December 17, 1993
Rough Draft Proposal for Internal Memo and Five Year Plan
CC: Distribution
White House Meetings:
It was decided to forward the following to the national office for reference. A series of brainstorming meetings will be held at the
White House through Winter 1994. All suggestions should be collated
and delivered to our policy team by then.
Fundraisers:
A series of fundraisers should be organized for local political allies through the spring of 1994, the details will be outlined in an attached memo. We should have a stronger presence at Anna Eshoo's fund raiser
in early January.
Press Releases:
A subcommittee on media and public affairs assembled a list of press releases and studies, which can be timed to one released to the media per day, in order to fully maintain the high profile of the gun control
issue. We don't want to lose the momentum initiated by the massacre in Long Island, however, many local news organizations have been very active in keeping the gun control issue resolutely in view, without any
assistance from us. Be sure to call the various station managers and
news services to express your thanks.
D-Day is January 1994. . .
This month will be crucial to swaying votes for Sen. Feinstein's Assault Weapon Ban. Once this passes, we will see the beginning of a landslide which the NRA thugs will not be able to stop, or their few pawns in
Congress be able to filibuster. [sic]
Thanking our friends . . .
A subcommittee will draft a letter of support to Rep. Chales Schumer and offer additional materials that we have collected for his use in testimony and press conferences. A special press conference was proposed in order to thank various State politicians for their support for stricter gun control. The subcommittee urged HCI members to maintain the current high visibility of the gun-control issue
[then to next page, which we've seen...]
and remember to praise Presdent Clinton...
-----
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 1994 09:44:22 -0800
From: Jeff Chan <chan>To: ca-firearms, firearms-politics@ns1.rutgers.edu
Subject: Re-fixed: HCI Master Plan
Jeff C.
-----
Here is a corrected version of the HCI 5 year plan. It begins on page 2 because allegedly because the original was faxed with a post
it covering most of the first page. My paper copy is from the person who got it from HCI. I believe it is authentic, but have no proof.
If some comes along, I'll relay it.
This is allegedly a draft of a confidential internal memo.
Jeff Chan
chan@shell.portal.com
-----
Notes on the transcription:
The text below is my correction of an earlier posting from a BBS,to the Bluemoon BBS, then forwarded to the Internet by Larry Cipriani.
Line in the original are about 10 to 12 characters longer.Original document was in 10 point courier font and 1.5 spaced.
_This indicates underlined text._
Section titles and section headings were bold.
Page #, & December 29, 1993 appear centered at the top of each page.Confidential appears at the bottom in Helvetica font.
------
[begin text]
and remember to praise President Clinton and Attorney General Janet Reno for their political courage for standing up to the old boy network of the Gun Lobby. Special praise to Senator Diane Feinstein was mentioned for her courage in standing up to the ever diminishing number of gun crazy extremists who are actually pushing to make our society a killing field.
_What is pending now and can be law in 1994!_
* Ban of all clips holding over 6 bullets
* Ban on all semiautos which can fire more than 6 bullets without reloading.
* Ban of possession of parts to convert arms into military configuration
* Ban on all pump shotguns capable of being converted to over 5 shots without reloading
* Banning of all machine guns, destructive devices, short shotguns/ rifles, assault weapons, Saturday Night Specials and Non-Sporting Ammunition.
* Arsenal Licensing (for possession of multiple guns and large amounts of ammunition)
* Elimination of the Dept. of Civilian Marksmanship, long considered a sacred cow and a dinosaur from the Cold war years
(Thank you President Clinton!!!)
* Ban on possession of a firearm within a home located within 1000 feet of a schoolyard.
* Ban on all realistic replicas/toy guns or non-firearms capable of being rendered realistic
* The right of victims of gun violence to sue manufacturers and dealers to be affirmed and perhaps, aided with money from
government programs.
* Taxes on ammo, Dealers licenses & guns to offset the medical costs to society.
and . .
* the eventual ban of all semi-automatics (regardless of when made or what caliber)
_What was only a dream ten years ago can be reality as early as this year!!!_
After the meeting, the following ideas were the result of a brainstorming session to guide the focus of gun control initiatives
over the next five years. These may not be politically feasible ideas for 1994, but we are confident that with continued pressure we
can achieve most if not all of these goals within the next five years. The following list is condensed from our meeting in which
we considered the best ideas for public safety expansion. The time is right for action.
_Five year Plan:_
_Licenses:_
1 National Licensing of all Handgun purchases
This is at the top of our list, however, the political climate may be right to initiate this step immediately. Please refer to our memo outlining our ideas on how this should be executed.
2 License for Rifle and Shotguns
We should take our cues from Great Britain. Strict licensing should be mandatory for all firearms, whether handguns or not.
3 State Licenses for ownership of firearms
We want to take a workable idea from Great Britain, whereas, we should require the states to issue strict licenses for possession and require the licenses to be signed by at least three public officials - i.e. the police chief, the city attorney and the mayor,for example, to eliminate ownership by dangerous individuals. It is reasonable to require that all individuals must prove to the signers that they require a firearm. This should be attached to any legislation required [sic] purchasers to show a need for a firearm.
4 Reduction of the number of guns to require an Arsenal license
Right now the proposed Arsenal licenses which Senator Feinstein should be pushing for, requires an "Arsenal License" for those
people who feel they need more than 20 guns and 1000 rounds of ammunition. We feel that number is too generous, due to the fact that any number of guns constitutes a grave threat to the safety of the community, we suggest strongly that this license limit be reduced to possession greater than 5 guns and 250 rounds of ammunition.
5 Arsenal License Fees
It is not unreasonable to require a yearly fee for an Arsenal license to be at least $300.00, with a cap of $1000.00. The money collected can be used to defray the immense medical costs directly attributed to these deadly weapons.
6 Limits on Arsenal Licensing
No Arsenal Licensing to be permitted in counties with populations of more than 200,000.
7 Requirement of Federally Approved Storage Safes for all guns
We should follow Great Britain's lead on this. All licensed gunowners should be required to have a storage safe which meets
minimum federally mandated requirements. This step would reduce the tragic accidents which claim the lives of tens of thousands
of children a year and make it more difficult for burglars to steal the guns.
8 Inspection License
Another good revenue source would be mandatory inspection licensing of all safes. Each safe would be registered with a
specific serial number and the serial numbers and types of weapons stored should be on file with federal and state authorities.
Since unannounced inspectors can insure that all declared weapons are being properly stored, all safe licenses should have an additional yearly fee to offset the cost of these spot inspections.
_Public Safety Regulations:_
9 Ban on Manufacturing in counties with a population of more than 200,000
Guns are being built all the time and the number of licensed manufacturers are too great to justify the threat to public safety.
This is a small step to reduce the number of these shops where anything, even machine guns, are being built every day.
10 Banning all military style firearms
The Pending National ban on all Assault Weapons, based on a point system can be expanded to eventually cover any firearm with a remotely military appearance. We feel that this aggressive appearance appeals to the type of dangerous individuals who are a
definite threat to public safety. We hope that this point system can eventually be expanded to high powered air guns and "paint
ball" weapons, which can inflict great damage, and with a little effort can be converted to real guns.
11 Banning of any Machine Gun Parts or parts which can be used in a Machine Gun.
Periodicals such as "The ShotGun News" particularly cater to individuals which wish to build illegal machine guns. If Senator
Feinstein's courageous section of the crime bill is successfull in banning all machine guns, except for police and military, then
there would be no legitimate need for Machine Gun parts except to build illegal weapons.
12 Banning the carrying a firearm [sic] anywhere but home or target range or in transit from one to the other.
We should institute a federal mandate to the states to strictly regulate the carrying of firearms.
13 Banning replacement parts (mfg, sale, possession, transfer installation) except barrel, trigger group.
Thousands of people are building illegal weapons every day. We can put a dent in this by banning parts and parts kits, except
those items like the barrel and trigger group, which are most likely to wear out due to use.
14 Elimination of the Curio Relic [sic] list
A gun is a gun. Even an old gun can kill people. This is a loop hole in federal law which has allowed thousands of dangerous weapons to be distributed unchecked. This regulation, if enacted, would automatically eliminate the need for a Curio or relic collector's license. All handguns, rifles and shotguns would fall under the same category as their modern counterparts.
15 Control of Ammunition belonging to Certain Surplus Firearms
Senator Moynihan has already proposed a tax or ban on .22LR, 32 acp, 25 acp and 9mm ammo, however, it has been pointed out to us
that there is an extreme proliferation of high powered surplus rifles (i.e. the Mosin-Nagant series and the Enfield series) in which the wholesale prices are as low as $45-$75. We suggest that to control the proliferation of violence associated with the large numbers of these types of weapons entering this country that we ban the
importation of their ammunition, 7.64x54R [sic] and .303 R surplus ammunition.
16 Eventual Ban of Handgun Possession
This may be closer to reality than many of us think. Handguns are becoming increasingly unpopular and we think that within five years we can enact a total ban on possession at the federal level.
17 Banning of Any ammo that fits military guns (post 1945)
With the proliferation of high powered weapons, including semi- automatics and automatics from World War II, we suggest following the lead of Mexico, by prohibiting the sale, manufacture, possession or transfer of any caliber fitting a military firearm in service with a recognized military force after 1945.
_Ammunition and Explosives:_
18 Banning of any quantity of smokeless powder or black powder which would constitute more than the equivalent of 100 rounds of
ammunition. With the bombing the World Trade Center, it has been made clear that we must control the amount of explosive materials in public hands. It is arguable that no [sic] has any real need to have so much dangerous material on hand.
19 Ban on the possession of explosive powders of more than 1 kilogram at any one time.
Gun nuts are notorious for circumventing the intent of the law, so we can reinforce the above proposed regulation with this additional notation. This additional language can be useful in preventing
"bomb-maker" hobbyists and other dangerous individuals.
20 Banning of High Powered Ammo or Wounding ammo
In addition to the banning of military calibers, there is a plethora of dangerous rounds which are too high powered for sporting use. This includes the highest calibers of pistol and rifle ammunition (of note are the monster calibers for rifles and pistols, like the .50 caliber Desert Eagle Bullet). We should not forget the lessons learned with the insidious Black Talon Ammo. Hollow points, Glaser killing rounds and other types of ammunition design [sic] specifically for maiming should be prohibited.
21 A National License for Ammunition
This is an idea whose time has come. We should look at a Federal License for purchasing of ammunition of all kinds. A special form should be forwarded to a new federal office to track those who are
purchasing too much ammunition. Remember that a gun is useless without ammunition.
22 Banning or strict licensing of all re-loading components
Ammunition regulation laws can be regularly bypassed by home loaders, creating an underground cottage industry of ammo manufacture. Possession or purchase of re-loading materials and machines should
be restricted and those who wish to use specially loaded ammunition can go to a federally licensed 're-loader'.
23 National Registration of ammunition or ammo buyers
Fees collected from the national licenses should go towards a nationwide database of ammo buyers, with a possible background check to eliminate the purchase of dangerous ammo by felons or mental patients.
24 Requirement of special storage safe for ammunition and licensing
Like the storage safe for guns, there should be a national requirement for special safes to store ammo. These safes should be tamper proof and fireproof and be registered themselves so that on the spot inspections can be held. Again, the costs for these
inspections can be absorbed by the license fees.
_Gun Ranges:_
25 Restricting Gun Ranges to counties with populations less than 200,000
The obvious threat to public safety of shooting ranges and stray bullets has been lost on many states and counties. We can initiate a federal mandate or incentives to get states to prohibit any kind of
shooting range within a county with a population of more than 200,000.
26 Special Licensing of ranges
Those ranges which conform to the previous requirement should get special licensing above and beyond that which is required now.
Additional [sic] each existing or new shooting range must get in writing the permission of all property owners within a radius of seven miles.
27 Special Range Tax to visitors
Additional revenue can be a surtax on ranges, requiring the collection of a minimum of $85.00 per visit per person. This can
be in addition to required membership fees, upon which the state and local governments get a sizeable portion, to help defray the
immense cost of gun violence.
28 Waiting period for rentals on pistol ranges
It has been suggested in the past that felons can acquire pistols and other automatic weapons without a background check by renting a gun on a target range. Deranged individuals are basically being given a license to 'practice hunting humans' at these so called 'sporting ranges'. We think that a national waiting period for gun rentals is yet another idea whose time has come.
_Activities which promote Gun Violence_
29 Banning Gun Shows
Illegal transfers and the sales of assault weapons and submachine guns is a common event at these so called gun shows. A huge dent can be made in the illegal trafficking of weapons by banning these
shows altogether.
30 Banning of military reenactments
The questionable "Historical" value of these events has escaped public scrutiny for too long. Many of these so called historical
events are mere excuses for gun nuts to blast the countryside with automatic weapons. What is to keep them from loading live bullets and having those stray bullets kill innocent children? What lives in the future will be lost due to this paramilitary training going on right under our noses? We propose the prohibition of Survivalist/paramilitary, World War I and World War II and Civil War Re-enactments on federal land, and hope to encourage the states to prohibit them from state and county lands as well.
31 Making unlawful the assembly of more than 4 _armed_ individuals who are not peace offers [sic] or military
Since most hunting parties consist of four, we recognize the need to eliminate the currently legal assembly of shooters for
paramilitary training on private lands. This is just one good suggestion for our elimination of the "gun culture" from the
mainstream.
32 Begin to curb hunting on all public lands
Blood sports are an anathema to a civilized society, however, it has been a political reality that the hunters and their ilk have too strong of a stranglehold on Congress. We feel that the impending
defeat of high tech assault "killing machines" will open the door to other restrictions. With the diminishing number of hunters, we feel that perhaps in five years we can open up much more of our country to campers and hikers, and eliminate the threat to families out camping , by looking at much more restriction as to what parcels of land will allow hunting. This will not infringe on sportsmen's right [sic] to hunt on private land.
33 Making Gun Owners Records and Photos matter of public record
We would have to assemble a legal team, in order to investigate the balance of the right to privacy and the right to safeguard the public. We fully endorse the photographing and fingerprinting of all gun
owners, however, these records are usually relegated to law enforcement use only. We think that it would be a good idea to make
these records public, so that the communities can have the knowledge of who poses a danger to their community before disaster strikes.
We realize that this proposal would probably be controversial, thus a long public affairs campaign would have to be initiated in order to build public support and ease the transition of such an idea. We feel that this idea has merit, and can be justified via the past publication of the names of water wasters during drought, customers for prostitution, and deadbeat parents who are delinquent on child support.
34 Random Police Checks for Weapons (like sobriety checkpoints)
This idea was floated before in California in 1989, where some thought it would be a great deterrent to gang crime for
police to do sweeps for gang weapons. Right now this idea may have some resistance, however, the political climate can become right to initiate these random vehicle stop and checks at all level and in all types of neighborhoods. If we continue to maintain
the pressure we can make this a reality.
\
The Next Fifteen Years:
With all that is going on, who knows what is possible in the next fifteen years? With murders in the streets, and the public fed up, and the once mighty thugs of the Gun Lobby whimpering in impotence we have an opportunity to change the face of America for the better!
Previously we thought that it would take at least a century to eliminate dangerous weapons and guns from the public hands, but now with allies in the White House and Congress, we can accelerate this trend, and make the barbaric NRA extinct!!! Here are some ideas to consider for the long term:
_Banning of military acoutrements_ [sic]
Essential to the Neanderthal gun culture are the typical military clothing, camouflage, pouches, and gear, boots and other combat gear. They euphemistically refer to this as 'militaria'. Elimination of the future sale of these items will cripple the culture of violence well into the 21st century.
_Stricter guidelines for violence in television and the movies_
We should look at the possibility of victims of violence initiated by copying an act on television and the movie or video screen, suing the makers of such shows for compensation to their suffering. If the
industry cannot regulate itself, we may have to eventually look at an independent branch of government, to determine which scenes cause more harm than good to the public and regulate the numbers of violent acts portrayed.
_The total Elimination of arms from Society_
We cannot survive into the 21st century unless we remember the need to expand our wave to new thinking to the total disarmament of America. With much of the public disarmed we can become more like Great Britain, where we can also eliminate the need for much of our police to be armed. This would take a long time, however, a concerted public relations campaign can pressure local law
enforcement to give up their arms, when the time comes. Weapons, would be still available to special units like SWAT or the military.
_Control of Dangerous literature (Bomb making, machinegun conversions, etc.)_
Too much irresponsible material is purportedly covered by the 1st amendment, however, the time will come when our nation has to agree that some literature does not belong in a safe society, like instruction manuals on how to kill, or how to make homemade explosives, or nuclear bombs. We must realize that there can be such as thing as too much freedom where such literature poses a serious threat to the public safety.
1994 sounds the death knell for the bully tactics of the NRA and the culture of violence in America!!
We are pressing on all fronts and much of this can become reality sooner than we expect. With the loss of power and clout of the NRA and their various smaller crony organizations crumbling to dust, we can eliminate a 200 year old license to murder into history, and enter the 21st century a safer place for our children and our children's children.
[end text]
------
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 1994 01:33:28 -0800
From: Jeff Chan <chan>
To: ca-firearms, firearms-politics@ns1.rutgers.edu
Subject: Corrected: HCI Attachement 1
Here is my corrected version of "Atatchment 1" of the HCI memo.
The transcriber in this case, mike.bartelt@swcbbs.com (Mike Bartelt)
who posted to talk.politics.guns was more accurate than the original transcriber of the first part of the plan. There were still some errors that I found compared to my paper copy. The diff file follows.
I will check & post the debate points later.
Jeff Chan
chan@shell.portal.com
P.S. I have no idea how Mike got a paper copy.P.P.S. Ftp the whole file: portal.com:/pub/chan/hci-master
-----
HCI - Confidential Document
DO NOT DISTRIBUTE / NOT FOR GENERAL CIRCULATION
Attachment 1:
Stamped Received Stamped CONFIDENTIAL
Signed 1/6/94
_Confidential Information for use by Lobbyists or Senior Officers ONLY!_
I. _Proposed License Fees - 1994-1995 Gun Control Proposals_
Fees based on calculated costs of records maintenance, centralized computer system set up, cost of new computer and record keeping equipment,administrative costs of new federal and state offices, cost of enforcement
and inspection, and calculated cost of gun violence to society.
These listings and the documentation used to calculate these suggested fee schedules will be made available to Federal Law Enforcement Authorities and the U.S. Dept. of the Treasury for review, when the time is right.
Additional material will be made available to _key politicians_ when proposing any fee related legislation. These suggestions will be instrumental in determining the nature of future gun control legislation and proposals.
THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS CONFIDENTIAL!! DO NOT DISTRIBUTE BEYOND THE OFFICES OF HCI UNLESS HAND DELIVERED TO AN APPROVED STATE OR FEDERAL LEGISLATOR OR LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL.
a) Handgun License Fees:
Year 1 to 2:
Program can begin at a relatively low cost to discourage non-compliance:
_Suggested Fee Schedule:_ _$50 - $75 annual fee_
Year 3 to 4:
Fees would be raised to reflect the cost of enforcement and discourage new ownership:
_Suggested Fee Schedule:_ _$150 - $250 annual fee_
Year 5 to 8:
If private ownership has not been prohibited by this time then fees can be\gradually increased to discourage private ownership:
_Suggested Fee Schedule:_ _$550 - $625 annual fee_
b) Suggested penalties for non-compliance with licens
------------------
Every year,over 2 million Americans use firearms
to preserve life,limb & family.Gun Control Democrats
would prefer that they all die,instead.
ernest2, Conn. CAN opp. "Do What You Can"!
http://thematrix.acmecity.com/digital/237/cansite/can.html
PLEASE NOTE This is too large for me to fit
into one post.I will try to post the second half as a reply.ernest2)
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 1994 01:04:47 -0800
From: Jeff Chan <chan>
To: ca-firearms, firearms-politics@ns1.rutgers.edu
Subject: More: HCI Master Plan
I now have the cover sheet, addendum & some additional materials
from the HCI master plan circulated earlier. This is not scanned;
I typed it as accurately as possible, including some inconsistencies,
like "fundraiser" vs "fund raiser".
By the way, last count there were about 100,000 paid HCI members.
They supposedly count as members anyone who has called for
information or favorably answered their phone poll.
Additional materials included in the packet I got, but not typed
below include:
1. A fee schedule (what to do with the money from all the
registration & licensing schemes, including legal action against
gun owners),
2. "A Quick Guide to Arguing with the Gun Zealots" (debate points)
First is the distribution sheet:
-----
[appears to be standard letterhead for the Los Angeles office,
stamped: IMPORTANT, CONFIDENTIAL, received 12/30/93; next to
distribution list is handwritten: "UPDATE DIST. LIST!"]
HANDGUN CONTROL HANDGUN CONTROL, INC.
ONE MILLION STRONG...working to National Headquarters
keep handguns out of the wrong hands. 1225 EYE ST., N.W.
Suite 1100
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005
(202) 898-0792 Western Region Office
10951 WEST PICO BLV, ROOM 204
LOS ANGELES, CA 90064
(310) 446-0056
Distribution list cc: Richard Aborn,
David Birenbaum ,Lee Fisher,
Larry Lowenstein, John Phillips,
Helen Raiser, Maurice Rosenblatt,
Jeanne Shields, Odile Stern,
N.T. Shields, Sarah Brady,
Stanley E. Foster,John Hechinger,
Edward O. Welles, Charles J. Orasin,
Lois Hess, Sandy Cooney, Amy Weitz,
[comment: isn't it Edwin Welles? Would someone please look this up?????]
-----
[next the first page, missing from the prior post: note that the address
is slightly different from the page before. Stamped CONFIDENTIAL.]
HANDGUN CONTROL,ONE MILLION STRONG...working to keep handguns out of the wrong hands.
HANDGUN CONTROL, INC.
10951 WEST PICO BOULEVARD,SUITE 201
LOS ANGELES, CA 90064 ;(202) 898-0792
CONFIDENTIAL! NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION!
Notes and Minutes of Meeting of Friday, December 17, 1993
Rough Draft Proposal for Internal Memo and Five Year Plan
CC: Distribution
White House Meetings:
It was decided to forward the following to the national office for reference. A series of brainstorming meetings will be held at the
White House through Winter 1994. All suggestions should be collated
and delivered to our policy team by then.
Fundraisers:
A series of fundraisers should be organized for local political allies through the spring of 1994, the details will be outlined in an attached memo. We should have a stronger presence at Anna Eshoo's fund raiser
in early January.
Press Releases:
A subcommittee on media and public affairs assembled a list of press releases and studies, which can be timed to one released to the media per day, in order to fully maintain the high profile of the gun control
issue. We don't want to lose the momentum initiated by the massacre in Long Island, however, many local news organizations have been very active in keeping the gun control issue resolutely in view, without any
assistance from us. Be sure to call the various station managers and
news services to express your thanks.
D-Day is January 1994. . .
This month will be crucial to swaying votes for Sen. Feinstein's Assault Weapon Ban. Once this passes, we will see the beginning of a landslide which the NRA thugs will not be able to stop, or their few pawns in
Congress be able to filibuster. [sic]
Thanking our friends . . .
A subcommittee will draft a letter of support to Rep. Chales Schumer and offer additional materials that we have collected for his use in testimony and press conferences. A special press conference was proposed in order to thank various State politicians for their support for stricter gun control. The subcommittee urged HCI members to maintain the current high visibility of the gun-control issue
[then to next page, which we've seen...]
and remember to praise Presdent Clinton...
-----
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 1994 09:44:22 -0800
From: Jeff Chan <chan>To: ca-firearms, firearms-politics@ns1.rutgers.edu
Subject: Re-fixed: HCI Master Plan
Jeff C.
-----
Here is a corrected version of the HCI 5 year plan. It begins on page 2 because allegedly because the original was faxed with a post
it covering most of the first page. My paper copy is from the person who got it from HCI. I believe it is authentic, but have no proof.
If some comes along, I'll relay it.
This is allegedly a draft of a confidential internal memo.
Jeff Chan
chan@shell.portal.com
-----
Notes on the transcription:
The text below is my correction of an earlier posting from a BBS,to the Bluemoon BBS, then forwarded to the Internet by Larry Cipriani.
Line in the original are about 10 to 12 characters longer.Original document was in 10 point courier font and 1.5 spaced.
_This indicates underlined text._
Section titles and section headings were bold.
Page #, & December 29, 1993 appear centered at the top of each page.Confidential appears at the bottom in Helvetica font.
------
[begin text]
and remember to praise President Clinton and Attorney General Janet Reno for their political courage for standing up to the old boy network of the Gun Lobby. Special praise to Senator Diane Feinstein was mentioned for her courage in standing up to the ever diminishing number of gun crazy extremists who are actually pushing to make our society a killing field.
_What is pending now and can be law in 1994!_
* Ban of all clips holding over 6 bullets
* Ban on all semiautos which can fire more than 6 bullets without reloading.
* Ban of possession of parts to convert arms into military configuration
* Ban on all pump shotguns capable of being converted to over 5 shots without reloading
* Banning of all machine guns, destructive devices, short shotguns/ rifles, assault weapons, Saturday Night Specials and Non-Sporting Ammunition.
* Arsenal Licensing (for possession of multiple guns and large amounts of ammunition)
* Elimination of the Dept. of Civilian Marksmanship, long considered a sacred cow and a dinosaur from the Cold war years
(Thank you President Clinton!!!)
* Ban on possession of a firearm within a home located within 1000 feet of a schoolyard.
* Ban on all realistic replicas/toy guns or non-firearms capable of being rendered realistic
* The right of victims of gun violence to sue manufacturers and dealers to be affirmed and perhaps, aided with money from
government programs.
* Taxes on ammo, Dealers licenses & guns to offset the medical costs to society.
and . .
* the eventual ban of all semi-automatics (regardless of when made or what caliber)
_What was only a dream ten years ago can be reality as early as this year!!!_
After the meeting, the following ideas were the result of a brainstorming session to guide the focus of gun control initiatives
over the next five years. These may not be politically feasible ideas for 1994, but we are confident that with continued pressure we
can achieve most if not all of these goals within the next five years. The following list is condensed from our meeting in which
we considered the best ideas for public safety expansion. The time is right for action.
_Five year Plan:_
_Licenses:_
1 National Licensing of all Handgun purchases
This is at the top of our list, however, the political climate may be right to initiate this step immediately. Please refer to our memo outlining our ideas on how this should be executed.
2 License for Rifle and Shotguns
We should take our cues from Great Britain. Strict licensing should be mandatory for all firearms, whether handguns or not.
3 State Licenses for ownership of firearms
We want to take a workable idea from Great Britain, whereas, we should require the states to issue strict licenses for possession and require the licenses to be signed by at least three public officials - i.e. the police chief, the city attorney and the mayor,for example, to eliminate ownership by dangerous individuals. It is reasonable to require that all individuals must prove to the signers that they require a firearm. This should be attached to any legislation required [sic] purchasers to show a need for a firearm.
4 Reduction of the number of guns to require an Arsenal license
Right now the proposed Arsenal licenses which Senator Feinstein should be pushing for, requires an "Arsenal License" for those
people who feel they need more than 20 guns and 1000 rounds of ammunition. We feel that number is too generous, due to the fact that any number of guns constitutes a grave threat to the safety of the community, we suggest strongly that this license limit be reduced to possession greater than 5 guns and 250 rounds of ammunition.
5 Arsenal License Fees
It is not unreasonable to require a yearly fee for an Arsenal license to be at least $300.00, with a cap of $1000.00. The money collected can be used to defray the immense medical costs directly attributed to these deadly weapons.
6 Limits on Arsenal Licensing
No Arsenal Licensing to be permitted in counties with populations of more than 200,000.
7 Requirement of Federally Approved Storage Safes for all guns
We should follow Great Britain's lead on this. All licensed gunowners should be required to have a storage safe which meets
minimum federally mandated requirements. This step would reduce the tragic accidents which claim the lives of tens of thousands
of children a year and make it more difficult for burglars to steal the guns.
8 Inspection License
Another good revenue source would be mandatory inspection licensing of all safes. Each safe would be registered with a
specific serial number and the serial numbers and types of weapons stored should be on file with federal and state authorities.
Since unannounced inspectors can insure that all declared weapons are being properly stored, all safe licenses should have an additional yearly fee to offset the cost of these spot inspections.
_Public Safety Regulations:_
9 Ban on Manufacturing in counties with a population of more than 200,000
Guns are being built all the time and the number of licensed manufacturers are too great to justify the threat to public safety.
This is a small step to reduce the number of these shops where anything, even machine guns, are being built every day.
10 Banning all military style firearms
The Pending National ban on all Assault Weapons, based on a point system can be expanded to eventually cover any firearm with a remotely military appearance. We feel that this aggressive appearance appeals to the type of dangerous individuals who are a
definite threat to public safety. We hope that this point system can eventually be expanded to high powered air guns and "paint
ball" weapons, which can inflict great damage, and with a little effort can be converted to real guns.
11 Banning of any Machine Gun Parts or parts which can be used in a Machine Gun.
Periodicals such as "The ShotGun News" particularly cater to individuals which wish to build illegal machine guns. If Senator
Feinstein's courageous section of the crime bill is successfull in banning all machine guns, except for police and military, then
there would be no legitimate need for Machine Gun parts except to build illegal weapons.
12 Banning the carrying a firearm [sic] anywhere but home or target range or in transit from one to the other.
We should institute a federal mandate to the states to strictly regulate the carrying of firearms.
13 Banning replacement parts (mfg, sale, possession, transfer installation) except barrel, trigger group.
Thousands of people are building illegal weapons every day. We can put a dent in this by banning parts and parts kits, except
those items like the barrel and trigger group, which are most likely to wear out due to use.
14 Elimination of the Curio Relic [sic] list
A gun is a gun. Even an old gun can kill people. This is a loop hole in federal law which has allowed thousands of dangerous weapons to be distributed unchecked. This regulation, if enacted, would automatically eliminate the need for a Curio or relic collector's license. All handguns, rifles and shotguns would fall under the same category as their modern counterparts.
15 Control of Ammunition belonging to Certain Surplus Firearms
Senator Moynihan has already proposed a tax or ban on .22LR, 32 acp, 25 acp and 9mm ammo, however, it has been pointed out to us
that there is an extreme proliferation of high powered surplus rifles (i.e. the Mosin-Nagant series and the Enfield series) in which the wholesale prices are as low as $45-$75. We suggest that to control the proliferation of violence associated with the large numbers of these types of weapons entering this country that we ban the
importation of their ammunition, 7.64x54R [sic] and .303 R surplus ammunition.
16 Eventual Ban of Handgun Possession
This may be closer to reality than many of us think. Handguns are becoming increasingly unpopular and we think that within five years we can enact a total ban on possession at the federal level.
17 Banning of Any ammo that fits military guns (post 1945)
With the proliferation of high powered weapons, including semi- automatics and automatics from World War II, we suggest following the lead of Mexico, by prohibiting the sale, manufacture, possession or transfer of any caliber fitting a military firearm in service with a recognized military force after 1945.
_Ammunition and Explosives:_
18 Banning of any quantity of smokeless powder or black powder which would constitute more than the equivalent of 100 rounds of
ammunition. With the bombing the World Trade Center, it has been made clear that we must control the amount of explosive materials in public hands. It is arguable that no [sic] has any real need to have so much dangerous material on hand.
19 Ban on the possession of explosive powders of more than 1 kilogram at any one time.
Gun nuts are notorious for circumventing the intent of the law, so we can reinforce the above proposed regulation with this additional notation. This additional language can be useful in preventing
"bomb-maker" hobbyists and other dangerous individuals.
20 Banning of High Powered Ammo or Wounding ammo
In addition to the banning of military calibers, there is a plethora of dangerous rounds which are too high powered for sporting use. This includes the highest calibers of pistol and rifle ammunition (of note are the monster calibers for rifles and pistols, like the .50 caliber Desert Eagle Bullet). We should not forget the lessons learned with the insidious Black Talon Ammo. Hollow points, Glaser killing rounds and other types of ammunition design [sic] specifically for maiming should be prohibited.
21 A National License for Ammunition
This is an idea whose time has come. We should look at a Federal License for purchasing of ammunition of all kinds. A special form should be forwarded to a new federal office to track those who are
purchasing too much ammunition. Remember that a gun is useless without ammunition.
22 Banning or strict licensing of all re-loading components
Ammunition regulation laws can be regularly bypassed by home loaders, creating an underground cottage industry of ammo manufacture. Possession or purchase of re-loading materials and machines should
be restricted and those who wish to use specially loaded ammunition can go to a federally licensed 're-loader'.
23 National Registration of ammunition or ammo buyers
Fees collected from the national licenses should go towards a nationwide database of ammo buyers, with a possible background check to eliminate the purchase of dangerous ammo by felons or mental patients.
24 Requirement of special storage safe for ammunition and licensing
Like the storage safe for guns, there should be a national requirement for special safes to store ammo. These safes should be tamper proof and fireproof and be registered themselves so that on the spot inspections can be held. Again, the costs for these
inspections can be absorbed by the license fees.
_Gun Ranges:_
25 Restricting Gun Ranges to counties with populations less than 200,000
The obvious threat to public safety of shooting ranges and stray bullets has been lost on many states and counties. We can initiate a federal mandate or incentives to get states to prohibit any kind of
shooting range within a county with a population of more than 200,000.
26 Special Licensing of ranges
Those ranges which conform to the previous requirement should get special licensing above and beyond that which is required now.
Additional [sic] each existing or new shooting range must get in writing the permission of all property owners within a radius of seven miles.
27 Special Range Tax to visitors
Additional revenue can be a surtax on ranges, requiring the collection of a minimum of $85.00 per visit per person. This can
be in addition to required membership fees, upon which the state and local governments get a sizeable portion, to help defray the
immense cost of gun violence.
28 Waiting period for rentals on pistol ranges
It has been suggested in the past that felons can acquire pistols and other automatic weapons without a background check by renting a gun on a target range. Deranged individuals are basically being given a license to 'practice hunting humans' at these so called 'sporting ranges'. We think that a national waiting period for gun rentals is yet another idea whose time has come.
_Activities which promote Gun Violence_
29 Banning Gun Shows
Illegal transfers and the sales of assault weapons and submachine guns is a common event at these so called gun shows. A huge dent can be made in the illegal trafficking of weapons by banning these
shows altogether.
30 Banning of military reenactments
The questionable "Historical" value of these events has escaped public scrutiny for too long. Many of these so called historical
events are mere excuses for gun nuts to blast the countryside with automatic weapons. What is to keep them from loading live bullets and having those stray bullets kill innocent children? What lives in the future will be lost due to this paramilitary training going on right under our noses? We propose the prohibition of Survivalist/paramilitary, World War I and World War II and Civil War Re-enactments on federal land, and hope to encourage the states to prohibit them from state and county lands as well.
31 Making unlawful the assembly of more than 4 _armed_ individuals who are not peace offers [sic] or military
Since most hunting parties consist of four, we recognize the need to eliminate the currently legal assembly of shooters for
paramilitary training on private lands. This is just one good suggestion for our elimination of the "gun culture" from the
mainstream.
32 Begin to curb hunting on all public lands
Blood sports are an anathema to a civilized society, however, it has been a political reality that the hunters and their ilk have too strong of a stranglehold on Congress. We feel that the impending
defeat of high tech assault "killing machines" will open the door to other restrictions. With the diminishing number of hunters, we feel that perhaps in five years we can open up much more of our country to campers and hikers, and eliminate the threat to families out camping , by looking at much more restriction as to what parcels of land will allow hunting. This will not infringe on sportsmen's right [sic] to hunt on private land.
33 Making Gun Owners Records and Photos matter of public record
We would have to assemble a legal team, in order to investigate the balance of the right to privacy and the right to safeguard the public. We fully endorse the photographing and fingerprinting of all gun
owners, however, these records are usually relegated to law enforcement use only. We think that it would be a good idea to make
these records public, so that the communities can have the knowledge of who poses a danger to their community before disaster strikes.
We realize that this proposal would probably be controversial, thus a long public affairs campaign would have to be initiated in order to build public support and ease the transition of such an idea. We feel that this idea has merit, and can be justified via the past publication of the names of water wasters during drought, customers for prostitution, and deadbeat parents who are delinquent on child support.
34 Random Police Checks for Weapons (like sobriety checkpoints)
This idea was floated before in California in 1989, where some thought it would be a great deterrent to gang crime for
police to do sweeps for gang weapons. Right now this idea may have some resistance, however, the political climate can become right to initiate these random vehicle stop and checks at all level and in all types of neighborhoods. If we continue to maintain
the pressure we can make this a reality.
\
The Next Fifteen Years:
With all that is going on, who knows what is possible in the next fifteen years? With murders in the streets, and the public fed up, and the once mighty thugs of the Gun Lobby whimpering in impotence we have an opportunity to change the face of America for the better!
Previously we thought that it would take at least a century to eliminate dangerous weapons and guns from the public hands, but now with allies in the White House and Congress, we can accelerate this trend, and make the barbaric NRA extinct!!! Here are some ideas to consider for the long term:
_Banning of military acoutrements_ [sic]
Essential to the Neanderthal gun culture are the typical military clothing, camouflage, pouches, and gear, boots and other combat gear. They euphemistically refer to this as 'militaria'. Elimination of the future sale of these items will cripple the culture of violence well into the 21st century.
_Stricter guidelines for violence in television and the movies_
We should look at the possibility of victims of violence initiated by copying an act on television and the movie or video screen, suing the makers of such shows for compensation to their suffering. If the
industry cannot regulate itself, we may have to eventually look at an independent branch of government, to determine which scenes cause more harm than good to the public and regulate the numbers of violent acts portrayed.
_The total Elimination of arms from Society_
We cannot survive into the 21st century unless we remember the need to expand our wave to new thinking to the total disarmament of America. With much of the public disarmed we can become more like Great Britain, where we can also eliminate the need for much of our police to be armed. This would take a long time, however, a concerted public relations campaign can pressure local law
enforcement to give up their arms, when the time comes. Weapons, would be still available to special units like SWAT or the military.
_Control of Dangerous literature (Bomb making, machinegun conversions, etc.)_
Too much irresponsible material is purportedly covered by the 1st amendment, however, the time will come when our nation has to agree that some literature does not belong in a safe society, like instruction manuals on how to kill, or how to make homemade explosives, or nuclear bombs. We must realize that there can be such as thing as too much freedom where such literature poses a serious threat to the public safety.
1994 sounds the death knell for the bully tactics of the NRA and the culture of violence in America!!
We are pressing on all fronts and much of this can become reality sooner than we expect. With the loss of power and clout of the NRA and their various smaller crony organizations crumbling to dust, we can eliminate a 200 year old license to murder into history, and enter the 21st century a safer place for our children and our children's children.
[end text]
------
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 1994 01:33:28 -0800
From: Jeff Chan <chan>
To: ca-firearms, firearms-politics@ns1.rutgers.edu
Subject: Corrected: HCI Attachement 1
Here is my corrected version of "Atatchment 1" of the HCI memo.
The transcriber in this case, mike.bartelt@swcbbs.com (Mike Bartelt)
who posted to talk.politics.guns was more accurate than the original transcriber of the first part of the plan. There were still some errors that I found compared to my paper copy. The diff file follows.
I will check & post the debate points later.
Jeff Chan
chan@shell.portal.com
P.S. I have no idea how Mike got a paper copy.P.P.S. Ftp the whole file: portal.com:/pub/chan/hci-master
-----
HCI - Confidential Document
DO NOT DISTRIBUTE / NOT FOR GENERAL CIRCULATION
Attachment 1:
Stamped Received Stamped CONFIDENTIAL
Signed 1/6/94
_Confidential Information for use by Lobbyists or Senior Officers ONLY!_
I. _Proposed License Fees - 1994-1995 Gun Control Proposals_
Fees based on calculated costs of records maintenance, centralized computer system set up, cost of new computer and record keeping equipment,administrative costs of new federal and state offices, cost of enforcement
and inspection, and calculated cost of gun violence to society.
These listings and the documentation used to calculate these suggested fee schedules will be made available to Federal Law Enforcement Authorities and the U.S. Dept. of the Treasury for review, when the time is right.
Additional material will be made available to _key politicians_ when proposing any fee related legislation. These suggestions will be instrumental in determining the nature of future gun control legislation and proposals.
THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS CONFIDENTIAL!! DO NOT DISTRIBUTE BEYOND THE OFFICES OF HCI UNLESS HAND DELIVERED TO AN APPROVED STATE OR FEDERAL LEGISLATOR OR LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL.
a) Handgun License Fees:
Year 1 to 2:
Program can begin at a relatively low cost to discourage non-compliance:
_Suggested Fee Schedule:_ _$50 - $75 annual fee_
Year 3 to 4:
Fees would be raised to reflect the cost of enforcement and discourage new ownership:
_Suggested Fee Schedule:_ _$150 - $250 annual fee_
Year 5 to 8:
If private ownership has not been prohibited by this time then fees can be\gradually increased to discourage private ownership:
_Suggested Fee Schedule:_ _$550 - $625 annual fee_
b) Suggested penalties for non-compliance with licens
------------------
Every year,over 2 million Americans use firearms
to preserve life,limb & family.Gun Control Democrats
would prefer that they all die,instead.
ernest2, Conn. CAN opp. "Do What You Can"!
http://thematrix.acmecity.com/digital/237/cansite/can.html