I found the following data interesting, as i'm interested in the .357 sig for defensive purposes.
The data is from Peter Jordan's article,"Why Consider a .357 Sig Caliber."
Hearing damage possible-85dB
Threshold of pain-120dB
Jet engine at takeoff-140dB
.22 pistol-152dB
12 gauge shotgun-156dB
.45acp-157 dB
9mm-160dB
.357 mag-164dB
According to the article:
"Each increase of 3dB corresponds to sound that has twice as much energy.(Measured in pascals).Each 10dB increase corresponds to a 10-fold increase in energy."
It would seem the .357 sig would be no worse than the 164 rating of the .357 mag.Probaly somewhere inbetween the 9mm & the magnum.
That being said,maybe the .45 or a 180gr. 40 subsonic would be a better choice for home def. The .45's dB level is 7 less than the .357 mag, and 3dB less then the 9mm, which translates into atleast 2 times less energy noise wise.
All guns are obviously loud, but even slight increases in dB levels seems to make quite a bit of difference.
Just something to think about.Stay safe...long shot!
The data is from Peter Jordan's article,"Why Consider a .357 Sig Caliber."
Hearing damage possible-85dB
Threshold of pain-120dB
Jet engine at takeoff-140dB
.22 pistol-152dB
12 gauge shotgun-156dB
.45acp-157 dB
9mm-160dB
.357 mag-164dB
According to the article:
"Each increase of 3dB corresponds to sound that has twice as much energy.(Measured in pascals).Each 10dB increase corresponds to a 10-fold increase in energy."
It would seem the .357 sig would be no worse than the 164 rating of the .357 mag.Probaly somewhere inbetween the 9mm & the magnum.
That being said,maybe the .45 or a 180gr. 40 subsonic would be a better choice for home def. The .45's dB level is 7 less than the .357 mag, and 3dB less then the 9mm, which translates into atleast 2 times less energy noise wise.
All guns are obviously loud, but even slight increases in dB levels seems to make quite a bit of difference.
Just something to think about.Stay safe...long shot!