A little biased?
That article reeked of liberalism. The fraternal police order guy's statement has no relevance in this situation. "It would be a scary thing for my officers," Rich said. "You have felons, people with violent backgrounds -- that's a very frightening thing to our officers." Correct me if I am wrong, but it is already illegal for felons to even possess a firearm, correct? Aren't most violent offenders already prohibited from possessing firearms? So how does allowing law-abiding citizens the right to carry a firearm have anything to do with criminals carrying firearms? Liberals.
