Group seeks more restrictions on sniper rifles

dZ

New member
Group seeks more restrictions on sniper rifles

http://www.dailydem.com/display/inn_news/news3.txt
DES MOINES (AP) -- Ownership of a high-powered .50-caliber sniper rifle used by the U.S. military in the Persian Gulf War should be restricted, a gun control group said Tuesday.
""It is almost impossible to exaggerate the lethality of the .50-caliber sniper rifle,'' said John W. Johnson, executive director of Iowans for the Prevention of Gun Violence.
In the Persian Gulf War, similar sniper rifles were used to make kills more than a mile away, Johnson said. The rifles give a soldier enough firepower to attack targets such as armored personnel carriers and radar dishes.
""Now those are good features for a military weapon, but in civilian terms, you have a perfect weapon for assassination and terrorism,'' Johnson said.
The group called a random sample of gun shops to ask about the availability of the sniper rifle, spokeswoman Kirsten Meredith said.
None of the stores in Iowa had the gun in stock, but most said they could order it and also could get armor-piercing bullets for it, she said.
""It is important to point out that not one gun store asked why we were inquiring about ordering such a lethal and powerful weapon,'' Meredith said.
Johnson said his group supports legislation proposed by Rep. Rod R. Blagojevich, D-Ill., that would make the .50-caliber sniper rifle subject to the same laws that restrict ownership of machine guns.
Under current law, people who want to buy a machine gun must undergo a background check and pay a tax. They also must register the gun with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms.
But Jim Hall, owner of Jim's Gun & Pawn Shop Inc., one of the stores the group called, said in a telephone interview that the gun, which can cost more than $2,000, is not very popular with gun buyers.
""It's not a cheap gun to buy,'' Hall said. ""I've always got people who want to look at one, but I've never had anyone who wants to lay the money down.''
Hall thinks current laws restricting the gun are adequate. He said he doubts a potential terrorist would try to buy one -- legally, anyway.
""If a terrorist is going to get it, he's not going to come in and buy it from a legitimate dealer,'' Hall said.
Gun dealers would not sell a .50-caliber sniper rifle to just anyone, he said.
""Ninety-nine percent of us are pretty legitimate and we're not going to give them someone who we think is a goofball,'' Hall said.
Mike Gillette, director of training at the Des Moines-based National Law Enforcement and Security Institute, had no problems with efforts to restrict sales of the rifle, but said the high price alone would deter many buyers.
""It's really a non-issue to us,'' Gillette said. ""Violence is violence, and violence will always find a vehicle.''
Gillette also pointed out that the most commonly used sniper rifle, the Remington 700, is also ""an extremely popular hunting rifle.''
On the Net:
Iowans for the Prevention of Gun Violence: www.ipgv.org/main.htm
National Law Enforcement and Security Institute: www.nlsi.net/
 
Let's Restrict Planes, Too

I can't wait til some bright upstart comes up with the idea to restrict airplanes....After all, it wasn't .50 cal rounds that took out the World Trade Center complex, but a couple of jets...I hope that not everyone in America is stupid enough to buy into more weapon bans...After all, we know that every gun law since the '30's has stopped so much crime that our prisons are almost empty...
Americans, please wake up.
 
It's good to see that the Iowa minions dance so ably and quickly to the tune called by their Brady Center masters. Although they do strike me as a little slow in getting from the "Gun Show Loophole Polka" to the ".50 Caliber Two Step".



"It is important to point out that not one gun store asked why we were inquiring about ordering such a lethal and powerful weapon,'' Meredith said.

Believe it or not, most folks at gun stores are still under the mistaken assumption that it's a free country. If you want to buy a Barrett to shoot at groundhogs before they come out of their holes, be our guest.
 
gas also

dont forget the fire in newyork many years ago that killed 98 people set by a drunk mad boyfriend, late 70's i think ,thanks,keith
 
"If you want to buy a Barrett to shoot at groundhogs before they come out of their holes, be our guest."

Tamara, I am STILL laughing. What a mental picture! Kinda reminds me of the scene in "Caddy Shack" where Bill Murray is after the chipmunk. Gives a whole new meaning to the term "overkill"!

Yanus
 
""It is almost impossible to exaggerate the lethality of the .50-caliber sniper rifle,'' said John W. Johnson.......""

But he managed to do so anyway.
 
And just how many .50 rifles have been used in crimes (including assassination) in the last 10 years?

The only thing saving grace to these imbeciles is their complete ignorance of the subject. A well-made .308 (read deer rifle) can reach out to nearly the same distances. Oops! I guess those will be banned next.
 
Anybody who can afford a $5-8,000 rifle is more likely to be sitting on the board of a bank than holding one up.
 
All of this hysterical flap...

about the big boomers is just going to make em more popular.
Unless there is state level legislation (like California's outright ban on private ownership of FA or silenced weapons) anyone who can afford the outlay for one of these things won't blink at the $200 Federal transfer tax fee. For example, look at the ads for automatic and supressed weapons that run in every issue of the Shotgun News.
Short of Crew-served artillery pieces, these rifles, and even their ammo, are the ultimate phallic symbol. :D Small wonder this item attracts those it attracts, and repels those it repels;)

Of course the Gumment can always use another tax source:rolleyes:
 
I know I'd feel safer...it feels like I'm in some sniper's crosshairs everytime I step outside. The only times I feel safe are in my unarmed home, my car, and in airplanes. The guns just gotta go :rolleyes:
 
It's too bad the 50 BMG rifle manufacturers couldn't lower their prices for one month so every lay-person that wanted one could afford one.That would really piss off the liberals.
 
Back
Top