Got lucky

DesertRatR

New member
I had a bit of a loading scare yesterday, and am recounting it here to remind folks to not deviate from their established procedure, just because the equipment is working properly.

I load on an RCBS Pro 2000 press. One nice feature is the micrometer control of the metering screw on the powder measure. I have found it to be a very reliable way to control powder weight. Once the setting is determined by trial and error it is very consistent. The micrometer thimble controls the metering screw via a set screw that locks the two parts together. You can see where this is going.

Yesterday I started out loading 200 rounds of 230 gr 45 ACP with 5.2 grain Unique. That is my standard load. It is a light load (Power Factor barely meets IDPA limit). I always start every loading session by calibrating my scale, dropping 25 loads to settle the measure, and then weigh 10 loads for score. That process is very consistent. And it was yesterday.

I visually check each load with a flashlight before dropping in the bullet. I was almost done with the loading when I noticed that the powder level in the cases seemed deeper than it should be. So I weighted 10 loads and discovered that the load had increased to about 7 gr. I shut down and disassembled the measure. Everything was clean and in good shape, except that the set screw between the micrometer thimble and the metering screw had loosened up. That let the metering screw back out, I presume. I’ve got it back together and the set screw loctited in. And I’ve got about half the rounds downloaded.

I am lucky. I used to check at the beginning, middle and end of a loading session. However, the thing was so consistent that I was only checking at the beginning of a session. I’ll go back to the old method. And continue to carefully check each case with a flashlight.

I called RCBS to see if there was anything else to check. Their only comment was “tighten that set screw and if it backs out again let us know”.

The point is you can't be too careful. I don't know if 7 gr would blow up the gun or not, but I don't want to find out. Stay consistent.
 
I am NOT attempting, even half attempting to bag on a progressive press but checking powder drop at start, middle and end still doesn't address this problem. It would seem to attempt to isolate affected or potentially bad rounds.

And start/middle/end in a session of 50 rounds is decent isolation. In a session of 350 rounds, not so much.

This is where I have found and have ALWAYS found my biggest benefit in charging a full tray of 50 with my Lyman 55 before placing a bullet over any of them.

I am not at all familiar with the set screw that caused your problem. I have this idea in my mind that I would attempt to mark it's tightened position with an index dot/line system, so that a direct look at it could (hopefully?) confirm that it has not traveled.
 
Also, I will argue with your subject line -- diligent checks and balances aren't "luck", you are a conscientious handloader that KNEW to check important items. You found a problem with diligence, not luck.

Well done!
 
Photo of the powder measure micrometer
obiPDOt

Photo of index marks to check if thimble/metering screw is slipping
Yg5nnTR


I wasn't trying to start an argument regarding press type. My point was simply paying attention to detail, and not getting lax because the equipment is working well every time you check it. Whatever your procedure is, stick to it.
 
DesertRatR wrote:
I had a bit of a loading scare yesterday, and am recounting it here to remind folks to not deviate from their established procedure, just because the equipment is working properly.

Thank you for the report. And thank you for the renewed warning against complacency.
 
I don't know if 7gn (of Unique) would blow up the gun or not

For grins, I mocked it up on QuickLoad - using a Speer 230gn TMJ RN - and got a little over 23KPSI, with a velocity of 1008 f/s through a 5" bbl.

So would it blow up your gun? Probably not. But I most certainly would NOT feed such ammo to any of my 1911's.

Unique, being a little slower than most propellants typically used for 45 ACP, afforded a little forgiveness.
 
Back
Top