Gore Says He Won't 'Disarm America'

dZ

New member
By SANDRA SOBIERAJ=
Associated Press Writer=
WASHINGTON (AP) _ Vice President Al Gore responded Wednesday
with a chuckle to the National Rifle Association's recent
declaration of war on his candidacy and insisted: ``I have no
intention of proposing or supporting policies or allowing policies
that disarm America.''
The Democratic presidential candidate, speaking on National
Public Radio's ``Diane Rehm Show,'' was reacting to a vivid image
from last weekend's NRA convention. Association president Charlton
Heston had lifted a musket above his head and challenged Gore,
saying the weapon would have to be pried ``from my cold dead
hands.''
Reminded by Rehm of that scene, Gore replied with a laugh that
``I would not do what he accuses me of planning.''
Heston and others at the convention in Charlotte, N.C., accused
the Clinton-Gore administration of plotting to confiscate guns from
law-abiding citizens and then ban the weapons, beginning with
licensing and registration.
``I have no intention of proposing or supporting policies or
allowing policies that disarm America or take guns away from
law-abiding gun owners,'' Gore said Wednesday.
``What I have proposed that has upset (Heston) so much is a set
of common-sense restrictions on the availability of handguns to
people who shouldn't have them.''
Gore has proposed mandatory child-safety trigger locks, a ban on
cheap ``Saturday night special'' guns, a one-per-month limit on
individual handgun purchases, and gun-safety testing and
photo-licensing for all purchasers of new handguns.
Bush, the Texas governor whom Heston has endorsed in the
presidential campaign, said earlier this month that he would have
his state provide free trigger locks to anyone requesting one. But
he opposes mandatory trigger locks.
Gore racked up a pro-gun voting record in his days as a
congressman from Tennessee _ so much so that Bush, his Republican
rival, recently suggested Gore was once a card-carrying NRA member,
something the Gore camp dismissed. Bush aides eventually
acknowledged they could not back up the governor's contention.
As a senator, Gore in 1985 voted against a 14-day waiting period
for handgun purchases and in 1990 voted against an amendment that
would have prohibited the sale of large-capacity ammunition
magazines and banned a dozen types of assault-style weapons.
Gore has spoken of those votes, which stand in contrast to his
more staunchly gun-control agenda of today, as part and parcel of
representing rural districts of Tennessee hunters and sportsmen.
Also on Wednesday, Gore kept up his drumbeat against Bush's plan
to allow workers to invest some of their Social Security payroll
taxes in the stock market.
Although Bush has not specified how much he would allow to be
diverted to private investment, Gore said that taking even 2
percentage points away from the 12.4 percent of an individual's
income that now goes to the Social Security Trust Fund would amount
to a 16-percent cut in resources to the fund.
``That means that the people who are currently receiving Social
Security checks will be relying on a trust fund that is suddenly
missing 16 percent of its regular income,'' Gore said. ``How do you
make that up?''
He brushed aside his own deficit in recent polls. But, for a man
who asserted, ``I don't pay much attention to them,'' he betrayed a
solid familiarity with the numbers.
``Polls are notoriously misleading. The fact that there is a
4-to-5 point spread, when you look at them together, doesn't really
amount to much,'' Gore said.
``Six months ago it was a 20-point spread, so if you look at it
over that time frame, you could say, 'Oh, well, Gore's really made
progress.'''
 
I guess that's why he came out so strongly against the Slick & Wesson deal.

"As a senator, Gore in 1985 voted against a 14-day waiting period for handgun purchases and in 1990 voted against an amendment that
would have prohibited the sale of large-capacity ammunition magazines and banned a dozen types of assault-style weapons. Gore has spoken of those votes, which stand in contrast to his
more staunchly gun-control agenda of today, as part and parcel of representing rural districts of Tennessee hunters and sportsmen."

Ah, yes, Gore has often acknowledged the needs of hunters and sportsmen for "assault" weapons, handguns and high-cap mags. :puke:

And now that he wants to be president, those same Tennessee hunters and sportsmen can go to he//, I guess.


[This message has been edited by Ledbetter (edited May 25, 2000).]
 
Gomer Gore would NEVER lie, no matter that his Master is the biggest liar ever to sit in the Red House.

Afterall, would a man who invented the Internet, had a popular novel, "Love Story," written about his love life, ever lie about anything?? Nahhhh.

Afterall, why would any of us serfs and peasants object to crawling on our hands and knees and kissing Gomer's rectum to beg for permission to have a tool to save our own lives??

Afterall, our lives belong to Gomer and Slick and all the other communistnazis who ply their Marxist ideology in the halls of the King's Court.

J.B.
J.B.
 
Why doesn't Gore simply say, "Read my lips"? ;)

------------------
Either you believe in the Second Amendment or you don't.
Stick it to 'em! RKBA!
 
Gore is telling the truth - he will never disarm america, or even try - THIS IS THE TRUTH.

They could not confiscate the registered weapons from licenced owners so quickly - that task will be up to a future administration.


Battler.
 
Gore: "I will not disarm America."
Nixon: "I am not a crook."
Bush: "No new taxes."
Clinton: "I did not have sex with that woman."


How can you tell when a politician is lying?

His lips are moving.

------------------
"..but never ever Fear. Fear is for the enemy. Fear and Bullets."
10mm: It's not the size of the Dawg in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog!
 
I believe him. 100%.

He would never take single shot shotguns and sub-military caliber rifles from hunters.
 
Let's make sure he never gets the chance to make decissions like this by sending him home (where ever that really is) next Noivember.
Maybe he is getting scared by the recent polls suggesting that his savage attacks on gun owners has back fired on him and maybe his waffling will next turn off some the fanatical anti's he has been courting in the past. They cannot be satisfied with his answers now.
I think he is now in a loose/loose situation on the 2nd Amendment issue.
 
Back
Top