"Google Bombing" the Right?

Cowled_Wolfe

New member
Google bombing becomes new tactic for political campaigns

Mark Raby
October 27, 2006 12:17

Chicago (IL) - With the Democrats desperately trying to take back control of Congress, and Republicans seemingly in the news every day for a new scandal, Chris Bowers has set into motion a plan to further expand both of these issues by calling for a national liberal team of "Google bombers" who would ideally flood the search engine's online algorithm to highly associate Republican candidates with a single scandal that's been reported about them.

For example, a quick search for Californian candidate Richard Pombo immediately brings up stories about his ties to Tom Delay and Jack Abramoff, two Washington guys who were indicted on fraud and conspiracy charges. Or, more front page-worthy, searches for Republican speaker Dennis Hastert bring up stories that claim he was negligent about the Mark Foley scandal.

Although the goal of the project is to link voters between Republicans and bad press they've received, the one who initiated it, Chris Bowers, says he only wants to "Google bomb" candidate searches with news from non-partisan sources. Bowers wants to associate the key Republican candidates with a specific hyperlink to an "unflattering" story, and encourages users to paste the hyperlink whenever referring the candidate online. Ideally for Bowers, this would then cause that link to shoot up in the rankings when people search Google for information on that candidate.

On the liberal blog Daily Kos, Bowers states the purpose of the project as "the utilization of Google Adwords and simultaneous, widespread embedded hyperlinks in order to drive as many voters as possible toward the most damning, non-partisan article written on the Republican candidate in seventy key US Senate and House races."

Within hours of posting his idea, Bowers noted that all 70 targeted "key" Republican candidates were now associated with at least one negative news story. "Many campaigns won't know what hit them. Once again, the netroots prove their strength. High fives all around," he said in response to the high turnout. Bowers keeps a running tab of the articles associated with each of the 70 Republicans on a publicly accessible Google Spreadsheets file.

Google Bombing is not a new exploitation, and it's not the first time it's been used to make a political statement. For example, a search for " failure" once brought up George W. Bush as a top result. Bowers claims it's not an attack, but rather the beginning of a new campaign tactic for everyone. "There's no hidden agenda. One of the reasons for this is to show that campaigns should be doing this on their own," he said.
(Link here.)


IMO, this article goes hand-in hand with this thread. It was bad enough when smear campaigns were on TV and radio, but Google bombing to influence the results people get when they search for politicians is just wrong. It takes one of the few ways to get mostly unbiased information on politics and adds a bias.

By the way, for the less technically inclined, search engine results give priority to pages that are linked to by other pages with the same subject. Google bombing is where you make tons of pages about one subject link to the same page. If enough people link to "cheese.com" every time they mention olive oil, a Google search on "olive oil" will show cheese.com as one of the top results...

Opinions, anyone?

Wolfe.
 
Last edited:
It's not just the "right" that's doing it. Republican attackers apparently had the idea first, but the conservatives were quick to pick up on the technique.

I doubt it'll make much difference. Do people really rely on Google searches to tell them how to vote? I don't - do you?

"Conservative blogger John Hawkins of Right Wing News learned of the strategy and urged his allies to "fight fire with fire." Hawkins expressed concern the Google-bombing campaign just might work for Democrats.

"Who would be doing a Google search on a particular candidate in the final days of a campaign?" he wrote. "Probably an independent voter who is trying to get more information about a candidate. And if the first article he runs across is a brutal hit piece, well, that could be the information that helps him make up his mind."

Source http://msnbc.msn.com/id/15418130/
 
ugh

Pathetic. It's no different than politicians mud slinging and telling us why their opponent shouldn't get the job instead of telling us why they should. The fact that both sides use this tactic is embarassing.
 
I wish I'd thought of it first when dealing with Wisconsin's Governor Doyle.

Actually, a few months ago, if you Googled "governor asshat," you got Doyle's website.
 
It's going to get even more common and hilarious. Expect to see politicians hiring the services of Search Engine Optimization "specialists" more and more often- anyone in that business is either ripping off their clients or doing it on their own for personal profit with adsense.

Shysters all.
 
Could someone who understands techno-jargon explain this a little more clearly? Is it google that is trying to associate Republicans with bad press or is it outside influences?
 
Could someone who understands techno-jargon explain this a little more clearly? Is it google that is trying to associate Republicans with bad press or is it outside influences?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_bomb

Basically it's exploiting google's pagerank system, the algorithm that's made it the most popular search engine in the world. Google is not associating anyone with anything, it's simply an exploitation of their system by jackasses on both the right and left.

http://www.google.com/search?lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q="Great President."

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q="Worst+president+ever"&btnG=Search
 
Back
Top