Good rifle for a beginner?

M

Mosin-Marauder

New member
Hello all, before I start I'd like to say that I'm just asking for people opinions on which rifles are a good choice for a beginning shooter. Must be bolt action/lever action, have open sights and the ability to mount a scope, must be centerfire, must be chambered in a light recoiling round and finally, must be fairly inexpensive ($500 tops). The choices I have picked out so far are as follows Savage Hog Hunter in .223 Remington/ 5.56 NATO, and an oddball (kinda) A Marlin 336W in 30-30 ( I like .30 caliber). I'd like to hear your opinion, so let me know your ideas. Thank you.

(Yeah I ask a lot of these questions, I like to know my options, nothing wrong with that :))
 
I've never much liked the looks of savage rifles, but they are plenty accurate, I recently shot a savage 223(never did catch the model) and it did very well off hand at a distance. I have also done a fair bit of shooting with marlins and 30-30s. I can say that if you are looking for something that is a step down from your K31 or 91/30, this probably isn't a big enough leap. 30-30 is a milder cartridge but it is negated by the lighter weight of the 336. it does make a great deer rifle, and is a lot of fun to shoot but not something that you'd want to shoot all day long or use to try and get good at longer distance shooting.

personally, I would see if the savage hog hunter or a similar model is available in 243 winchester or 260 remington. both of those cartridges use a 308/7.62x51mm casing which is necked down to 6mm or 6.5mm(respectively to 243 and 260) so they are flatter shooting and lighter bullets make it recoil lighter. ammo's not as cheap as 223, but on par with 30-30 and reloading is not difficult.
 
I "have" (it's my rifle technically) a Remington 700 in .260 Remington. I haven't shown it in a long long time and it needs a scope too. I've considered it, but I don't really enjoy shooting it that much.
 
Last edited:
Mosin,
What's your goal? If you don't have a goal you might end up with a big pile of guns that aren't your go to rifle.

I've been using a winchester 94 30-30 for 20 years for deer hunting in short range brushy swamp conditions.

It will still kick you pretty hard. Sure I'll shoot 30-60 rounds just fine but the thin butt stock can kick hard. The marlin is similar and I have shot the 336 up to 444 marlin.

A Pachmyer slip on recoil pad makes things better.

But if I had to grab a gun this second that might not be my choice. On the other hand I have an identical older Win 94 and it's my go to cowboy cast lead shooter.

Did I mention I have a pile of guns with no use besides range shooting and sentimental value.

Why do I have a British 303 No 1 Mark 3?
1. It was $100
2. It was my grandpa's and I didn't ever see him shoot it.
3. To add on to the pile of guns.

I still wouldn't trade any of these away.

Personally to me a starter rifle is a good bolt action 22lr or mag then some middle weight rifle up to 243 and finally something in the 308/30-06 area.
 
Gotta agree with Blindstitch.

What are you trying to do with said gun?

Hunting, plinking, long distance target, or hunting?

We need to know these things for us to attempt to give an informed opinion.
 
For an adult or kid?

I think your chambering is a very good choice.

There are myriads of bolt action .223s (and pumps and levers too).

But since you want irons, it might be hard to beat a CZ 527 - the carbine with the short barrel and irons.

http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.aspx?Item=439106178

Or the FS is what I'd get in that situation:

http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.aspx?Item=430160312

Edit: Oops, wait - sorry, those are over budget. Ignore above. In that case...

Hmmm, are you willing to go used, or new only? I'd definitely go used on that budget, and look for a good deal on an old Remington model
seven with iron sights in .223 or .243.

Find something old - like 1970s or earlier, when most rifles had iron sights. Your usual suspects -if not a Rem Seven, then a Ruger 77, Rem 700, Rem 788, Win 70, Browning A-bolt, etc. It'll be just on the edge of your budget, and you'll have to be patient, but that's the best call on that budget. New, you can't get there from here - new Savages and such don't have irons (do they?).

http://www.armslist.com/classifieds...sellertype=1&tag=bolt-action&tag=223-556-nato

Now, the Mossberg MVP (one of the variants) does meet the criteria, as someone said, BUT it has a detachable mag (can be good or bad depending on your viewpoint - I say bad), and the sights are pretty cheap. And well, it's a Mossberg. I just cannot shake being leery of that bolt action since the bolt-through-the-face stories from a few years back. Just a cheaply-made rifle.

Think OLD, meaning quality and value for your dollar. There are many used guns out there which have been barely shot.

http://www.gunbroker.com/Bolt-Action-Rifles/BI.aspx?ca=5000020

[Oh, and nothing wrong with asking variants of the same question over and over - no harm, no foul. If you're saving up, why not gather as much info as possible, espec. if that process is itself fun?]
 
Last edited:
Mo,
You've been through all this before.

How many times do you need to have people go through it again?

You've discussed the Savage, you've discussed the .30-30.

You have never settled on an exact purpose, you've continually bounced around from gun to gun to gun, as the whim of the moment strikes you.
People have given you opinions.

Decide on what you want the gun to do, pick one, and go with it.
Someday, when you're older, you can get one of everything, but now you just flit from gun to gun asking the same questions & getting the same answers.

Not trying to dump on you, guy, but jeeze.
Fun's fun & all, most of us enjoy talking guns with you, but not the same old stuff in irregular cycles.

Settle on something & stick to it!
Denis
 
I'd go a .243, very versatile, hand load from 55gr up to 100gr depending on twist, load to suit required recoil. Not sure what platform you should use I personally haven't bought a iron sight centre fire for years now other than a couple of rem 7600's which I scoped any how. .243 is a calibre you won't regret buying. Of my varied 16+ calibres from .22lr to 45-70 the .243 is easily me go to rifle, easy shooting accurate noisier than .223 ,which I also have, but flatter shooting with marginally increased recoil.. I think ill have to change my name to Benny.243
 
I am in love with my Rossi m-92 in 357/38(shooting 38 is quieter than shooting a .22 and literally ZERO recoil), but I don't know what your looking for exactly. I also love .223 in a solid bolt action, accurate and affordable/available ammo. obviously two very different guns though.

these are fun, although probably not the most accurate option
http://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/product_info.php/products_id/76665

I have this same model in the 20" stainless, can be had cheaper in blue, fantastic rifle outta the box, don't listen to the haters
http://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/product_info.php/products_id/56503
 
I think u should be allowed to ask the question as much as u like, it's the first I've seen and you will always have others like myself giving opinions wanted or unwanted, if others have responded before they don't need to again. It's better to ask a stupid question than make a stupid mistake! Not saying your question stupid by any means, but you get my gist, if you feel you need/want more info or advice before making a decision which cannot be easily reversed, ask away I say
 
Noone is saying that Mo can't ask the question. It's just that he has a case of what the guitar world calls GAS (gear acquisition syndrome) as a potential to help his problems in training which some people have spent time helping him with.

I think the $500 would be better spent on a good scope and bipod/shooting rest along with thousands of rounds of ammo for the 10/22. Put a Boyd's stock, new trigger and/or barrel on it if you have to spend money.

If you really need a new gun, I recommend the CZ 452 in .22. That gun did more for my shooting than anything else. Even the .223 has more push, flash and noise. You can almost fire a bolt .22 with no hearing protection (don't) so there truly are no substitutes for working on anticipating shots/flinching and working on your fundamentals. I can shoot mine for an hour and a half on $7 worth of ammo. Not to mention it's capable of 1.25 MOA in my hands and less than 3/4 MOA in more capable hands. But I definitely would not buy another center fire without burning through a lot of .22 with productive practice
 
I know. this rifle I'm going to get is a ways down the road. I am going Friday to get a big bulk pack of the Aguila Super Extras for my 10/22, they shoot very well in my 10/22. Never said I would stop practicing with the .22 though.
 
If it's for a down the road rifle, I'd recommend a CZ. What do you want to do with it? Just bench rest? Hunt? What range are you going to take it out to? I'd get it it in a .223, 7.62x39, .243, .308, or maybe one of the 6.5mm rounds. Specific model and caliber choice will be dictated by your intended uses and what ammo availability you're okay with.

We recently won a Mossberg MVP predator, and it is a pretty light and handy plinking rifle. I personally would not take it over a CZ, but it's accurate and will do the job. I suspect the same is true of almost any major brand rifle over $300
 
What is it you don't like about your 260 exactly? Seems like it'd be easier to customize that into what you want than going with an entirely new rifle.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top