Gonzaga University students could face expulsion for gun

C

Cnon

New member
SPOKANE, Wash.-- Two Gonzaga University students could be expelled for using a gun to protect themselves at their University owned apartment.

GU leaders said the students violated a policy all students show know about when living in a school owned apartment.


Seniors Erik Fagan and Dainel McIntosh felt they needed to protect themselves in late October when a convicted felon came to their door asking for money. Fagan said he yelled for his roommate after trying to get the man to leave. McIntosh came down with his gun, which he has a concealed weapons permit for according to Fagan. The roommates said McIntosh scared the man off by flashing the gun.




http://www.nwcn.com/news/231242311.html


I agree with the students.


And another thing..............................However, were they just supposed to call the cops and hope and pray they make it in time?


What ever happened to taking responsibility for yourself in these situations????!!!


That just goes out the window just because you sign a lease??????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! What the blank is that about???????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!





Cnon
 
Last edited:
>
>...University leaders said the students should have known about the weapon policy.
>
Click to expand...

The key question will be whether the "policy" was written, and signed by the students, as condition of occupancy.

.
 
The real key question is that the students lived off campus. So does that not make the school a landlord like any other landlord? Landlords cannot usually forcibly seize property belonging to renters.
 
It's a very poorly written article with several spelling/usage errors, which doesn't help to communicate what happened and the policies. However, a policy that wasn't spelled out and that the students "should have known about" doesn't sound like much of a policy. It almost implies a "weapons are bad, therefore they are forbidden" mindset at the University (no surprising). Were they not in clear violation of something they had been presented in writing and signed to show their assent, I would fight it tooth and nail. Even in writing, the policy might be a violation of their rights and they could go for a lesser punishment.
 
Were they not in clear violation of something they had been presented in writing and signed to show their assent, I would fight it tooth and nail.
Click to expand...
Generally, all such policies are enumerated in a lease agreement, which they would have signed. It doesn't matter whether or not they read it; what matters is if they signed it.

Even in writing, the policy might be a violation of their rights and they could go for a lesser punishment.
Click to expand...
Which rights and how?
 
GU leaders said the students violated a policy all students show know about when living in a school owned apartment.
Click to expand...
If they knew the rules and chose to ignore them. Then they made a conscious decision not to abide by the rules knowing the consciences.
 
"IF" is the 1st question.

The second is the legality of the policy regarding a landlord's restrictions re off-campus housing under Washington Law.

Both need answers.
 
"Off campus" is often not when it comes to college policies. If the college owns or leases the property it is generally considered part of the campus even if it is not physically attached to the main property. I am fairly sure when I started college I signed something that said I would read and follow the rule handbook. So even if I never read it I would be bound by it. Could also be looked at the way the law often is, ignorance of the law is not an excuse for violating it.

Now if they made a decision to put their safety above following the rules I do not have a problem with it. But when making those decisions you have to be willing to suffer the consequences.
 
If you want to evaluate the fairness of an anti-gun policy, contract or lease, switch the word 'gun' for the word 'baby', and 'gun owner' for 'black people.'

"It is illegal for students to have, maintain or possess any (baby) [gun] in school owned or maintained dormitories."

"It shall be illegal for (black people) [gun owners] to use, lease or visit school grounds."

This shows discrimination that otherwise would go unnoticed, I've found, and would work very well in this case, as well.


Larry
 
If you want to evaluate the fairness of an anti-gun policy, contract or lease, switch the word 'gun' for the word 'baby', and 'gun owner' for 'black people.'
Click to expand...

I tried to look at it from that angel but it is too big a stretch for me. I do not think it is an argument that would get much traction.
 
If we consider that we have a fundamental right to bear arms (i.e., 2nd amendment) then that 'fundamental right' is most certainly protected.

We don't view it that way because we've been trained not to; think about the commotion if these students couldn't exercise other fundamental rights; if they could not vote, could not assemble, could not speak freely.

It's about time we started thinking and treating bearing arms as the RIGHT that it is, and our ability to bear them as protected by the constitution.

As long as we accept limitations on that right that we wouldn't accept on others, we're killing ourselves.


Larry
 
Even in writing, the policy might be a violation of their rights and they could go for a lesser punishment.
Click to expand...

Not hardly, they are living in someone else's property then they are subject to THEIR rules that IF enumerated in the contractual documents, makes them in violation of that agreement

They do not have to live there, they chose to live there and be subjected to the rules put forth by the owner (in this case the University)
 
^^

There is usually still laws regulating landlords and renters. Such as landlords can't discriminate, or enter the residence without the renters permission and such things. It doesn't matter what you sign the landlord cannot break the law themselves school or not IMHO.
 
Gonzaga University Student Handbook

Did the students know about Gonzaga's firearms policy? All students are required to read the university's handbook. Here is an excerpt from the Gonzaga University Student Handbook:

https://www.gonzaga.edu/Student+Lif...ty-Guide/files/2013-2014-Student-Handbook.pdf

WEAPONS, FIREWORKS & EXPLOSIVES

The presence and use of weapons on campus presents a potential threat to the safety of all community members. Use or display of weapons may result in threat or injury to self or others. Use or display of weapons, whether intentional or not, is generally inconsistent with the University’s Ethos Statement and may be illegal.

Possession, use, display, sale or exchange of weapons at any location on campus, including University residential facilities and privately-owned vehicles, is prohibited. The term “weapon” means any object designed to propel an object, inflict a wound, cause injury, incapacitate, damage property or cause a reasonable fear of such, and includes, but is not limited to, all firearms, pellet/BB/air guns, paintball guns, home-manufactured cannons or explosive devices, bows and arrows, slingshots, clubs, martial arts devices, switchblades or otherwise-illegal knives or knives with a blade longer than
three inches (with the exception of kitchen knives in our University homes and apartments). Replica guns and other simulated weapons are included within this policy. Objects otherwise not considered weapons, and knives with blades
less than three inches, may be included within this policy if used as a weapon. Fireworks, flammables, explosives and chemicals of an explosive and/or flammable nature are also prohibited.

Exceptions to this policy may be authorized by the Director of Campus Public Safety and Security. The University retains the right to search persons, possessions and bags and privately-owned vehicles on University property, and to confiscate, retain and dispose of/destroy all items covered by this policy regardless of value or ownership. Law enforcement may be contacted for some violations of this policy.
 
Exceptions to this policy may be authorized by the Director of Campus Public Safety and Security. The University retains the right to search persons, possessions and bags and privately-owned vehicles on University property, and to confiscate, retain and dispose of/destroy all items covered by this policy regardless of value or ownership. Law enforcement may be contacted for some violations of this policy.
Click to expand...

While that may apply to on-campus housing, it most likely will not apply to off-campus property, rented to students.

Here the campus security unlawfully entered a rented abode. They confiscated property in which they had no authority. Authority, as I understand it, rests with the city PD, not the Campus Security and especially not off campus.

Hope these guys get a competent attorney.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top