Just tried both today, found the grip of the G30 uncomfortable(too big) while the G21 was ok. Would appreciate comments/experiences on the performance/differnces in recoil-muzzle flip between the two. Heard that some G30 owners experienced little cracks on their receivers, is that true? Thanks in advanced.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Glock 30 /21
- Thread starter clarence
- Start date
Did you make a typo? The G30 is SMALLER than the G21. The G30 has a double-recoil spring, and is very nice to shoot. Some say they are more accurate with the G30 than the 21, but I love my 21. The difference in muzzle flip and recoil between them is slight. Better off thinking about what you want to do with the gun. While the G30 is better for carry for the size, the G21 has more options in caliber conversions, and a higher muzzle velocity.
Quantum Singularity
New member
Thats true, a small percentage of G30 owners have cracks in the receivers. Even some G26 and G27's have cracks in the receivers. Glock will replace the frame should that happen.
I prefer the Glock 21 over the 30 because its proved more accurate for me. Both have little felt recoil and are easy to shoot. However, you should choose whatever fits you best.
I prefer the Glock 21 over the 30 because its proved more accurate for me. Both have little felt recoil and are easy to shoot. However, you should choose whatever fits you best.
21 over 30 also. The 30 does not fit my large paw either, it's "chunky" & blocky, just does not feel "right". Have to fool around getting what seems a good grip on it. 21 does shoot softer {For me}. Still like the 30 but if the 21 fits your hand and conceals well for you it's the better way to go.
[This message has been edited by skevlar (edited October 13, 2000).]
[This message has been edited by skevlar (edited October 13, 2000).]
I think he is reffering to the size of the grip when he said "it's too big". The 30 is a little chunkier then the 21 but not enough to affect shooting. It's more a matter of getting use to it.
I like both guns but for over all versatilaty the 30 wins hands down.
Accuracy in both is fairly equal with a slight advantage to the 30. I don't know why but it probably has to do with the balance of the gun (weight, length, recoil spring).
The advantage of the 21 is the slide rails but I've heard that people have had problems with it because of the flexing of the frame. There is a new adapter for the M3 that attaches to the front of the trigger guard. It's basically a seperate rail that can be removed when not in use.
This makes any Glock able to hold an M3 light. I saw it on the cover of Handguns magazine this month.
The only true advantage of the 21 is the high cap magazine (expensive ($90+)) but even this will fit in the 30. To me, paying over $90 just to have an extra 3 rounds is a bit too much.
The whole crack in the plastic thing is just cosmetic and there is only a small amount of guns that actually have it. It's just a hairline imperfection in the molding process and is not in a stress area. If you have it Glock will replace your receiver. I've put about 900rds through mine and I don't have it and believe me, I've looked.
------------------
"It is easier to get out of jail then it is a morgue"
Live long and defend yourself!
John 3:16
NRA lifer
GOA
GSSF
KABA
I like both guns but for over all versatilaty the 30 wins hands down.
Accuracy in both is fairly equal with a slight advantage to the 30. I don't know why but it probably has to do with the balance of the gun (weight, length, recoil spring).
The advantage of the 21 is the slide rails but I've heard that people have had problems with it because of the flexing of the frame. There is a new adapter for the M3 that attaches to the front of the trigger guard. It's basically a seperate rail that can be removed when not in use.
This makes any Glock able to hold an M3 light. I saw it on the cover of Handguns magazine this month.
The only true advantage of the 21 is the high cap magazine (expensive ($90+)) but even this will fit in the 30. To me, paying over $90 just to have an extra 3 rounds is a bit too much.
The whole crack in the plastic thing is just cosmetic and there is only a small amount of guns that actually have it. It's just a hairline imperfection in the molding process and is not in a stress area. If you have it Glock will replace your receiver. I've put about 900rds through mine and I don't have it and believe me, I've looked.
------------------
"It is easier to get out of jail then it is a morgue"
Live long and defend yourself!
John 3:16
NRA lifer
GOA
GSSF
KABA
DerGlockenpooper
New member
The cracks are also a production mishap, and they are coming out of the box that way. It does not affect performance, it is not a stress issue, and if your gun does not have a crack it ain't gonna get one.
A batch of Glocks went out with cracks, so when you buy one, just check to make sure it does not have one. Even if it does, they will fix it. If you buy one without a crack, it is not going to crack later, so don't worry about it.
A batch of Glocks went out with cracks, so when you buy one, just check to make sure it does not have one. Even if it does, they will fix it. If you buy one without a crack, it is not going to crack later, so don't worry about it.
slickpuppy
New member
I like both, but have 2 G30s. Also have a G20 slide for the 21 and a G29 slide for the 30s. Its great to switch between 10mm and 45 with a simple slide switch.