..I voted for GB because Kerry had NOTHING to offer and little to believe him..Bush has been something of a snowball disappointment..serious issues facing this country and he is looking more like a weak-kneed compromiser..more like a politician trying to appear statesmanlike...and I am feeling in my gut he is on the corporate-dole train...my trust in him is fading quickly...he is almost treating the Iraq situation like a pet social-science project...there are too many other equally serious threats facing our country that are almost ignored or poorly confronted on his part...
George 'Waffler' Bush???
- Thread starter aspen1964
- Start date
shooter429
Moderator
I second your sentiment
and "feel your pain."
Oh, that was a different disappointment in the WH.
I don't get it either. The guy is leaning-no- running left like he'strying to catch a ball. WTF? He is wimping out the really important issues while infringing upon basic rights. Where is he when we need border security, gun rights, right to life issues, freedom of speech and religion?
What kind of President allows millions of criminals to flood our borders and then screams that police need more (illegal) powers? They are not using the ones they have. He thinks taking our constitutional protections against illegal searches or the right to face one's accusers in a fair and speedy trial of one's peers are quaint but unnecessary under his rule.
And as far as growth and the economy, it has gone from bad to pretty bad.
I am so tired of political doublespeak and outright lies.
Sorry. ranting. If only we could get a real conservative in the WH before we lose it all...
Shooter429
and "feel your pain."
Oh, that was a different disappointment in the WH. I don't get it either. The guy is leaning-no- running left like he'strying to catch a ball. WTF? He is wimping out the really important issues while infringing upon basic rights. Where is he when we need border security, gun rights, right to life issues, freedom of speech and religion?
What kind of President allows millions of criminals to flood our borders and then screams that police need more (illegal) powers? They are not using the ones they have. He thinks taking our constitutional protections against illegal searches or the right to face one's accusers in a fair and speedy trial of one's peers are quaint but unnecessary under his rule.
And as far as growth and the economy, it has gone from bad to pretty bad.
I am so tired of political doublespeak and outright lies.
Sorry. ranting. If only we could get a real conservative in the WH before we lose it all...
Shooter429
steelheart
Moderator
Yeah, right. She'll "fix" everything.:barf: :barf: :barf: :barf:
If The American Sheeple are simpleminded, gullible and stupid enough to elect her, they will deserve what they get.
Trouble is, the rest of us will get it, too.
steelheart
Moderator
I voted for a "third world" candidate in '92 (Perot) and look what it got us - the first scumbag Clinton infested the White House.
Vote Libertarian in '08 and the same thing will happen - you might as well vote for Reichmarshall Hillary herself.
Vote Libertarian in '08 and the same thing will happen - you might as well vote for Reichmarshall Hillary herself.
PressCheck
Moderator
I totally agree.
I did not vote for President Bush in the Republican primaries, but I did vote for President Bush in the general election.
I am usually never 100% in agreement with anyone on anything, but I do try to find "viable canidates" to vote for in which I agree with them (at least partially) on a majority of issues.
The only person I ever agree with 100% on anything is myself
I am usually never 100% in agreement with anyone on anything, but I do try to find "viable canidates" to vote for in which I agree with them (at least partially) on a majority of issues.
The only person I ever agree with 100% on anything is myself
Puppy,
Maybe I'm naive or maybe I have some unique insight but frankly I don't see HC or anyone who is that polarizing capturing their parties nomination and the hearts of the Nation. This country's had enough of the division and abrasive agents for a while from both sides.
Independents can emerge very quickly when the need is as severe as it is presently.Candidates from all directions can and do! Many had never heard of BC back in the day!...and all of a sudden "he are one!"
The many passionate and critical issues which now face us scream for something different. From the Spend-A-Rama by both parties to the irresponsible and vicious destruction of the middle class to manipulation of our concern for security while leaving the borders wide open...and offering carte blanche to anyone able to get here!:barf:
The genuine disgust for "W and Co" has put HC on the map for now but as time goes bye I believe there will be real alternatives.
Rimrock
Maybe I'm naive or maybe I have some unique insight but frankly I don't see HC or anyone who is that polarizing capturing their parties nomination and the hearts of the Nation. This country's had enough of the division and abrasive agents for a while from both sides.
Independents can emerge very quickly when the need is as severe as it is presently.Candidates from all directions can and do! Many had never heard of BC back in the day!...and all of a sudden "he are one!"
The many passionate and critical issues which now face us scream for something different. From the Spend-A-Rama by both parties to the irresponsible and vicious destruction of the middle class to manipulation of our concern for security while leaving the borders wide open...and offering carte blanche to anyone able to get here!:barf:
The genuine disgust for "W and Co" has put HC on the map for now but as time goes bye I believe there will be real alternatives.
Rimrock
I really don't think Hillary would win. There are too many people vocaly against it.
All the Republicans need to do to stay in power right now is run a moderate or at least not overly infamous/extreme candidate. The Deomcrats have been doing such a good job of putting up people who are absolute slimeballs that they've guranteed continued Republican leadership for some time to come.
All the Republicans need to do to stay in power right now is run a moderate or at least not overly infamous/extreme candidate. The Deomcrats have been doing such a good job of putting up people who are absolute slimeballs that they've guranteed continued Republican leadership for some time to come.
Hunter Rose
New member
Short of something massive (like confiscation of privately owned weapons), I don't think we'll have a "supprise third party". And there is no way for a third party to gather support in time for the next Presidential Election: heck, they aren't trying to start out properly in the first place. So we're gonna have a choice between Rep and Dem again, and repeatedly, until one party or the other implodes...