General stupidity and lack of common sense and carrying inappropriately...

Sciri

New member
OK, this is more or less two separate subjects that I've squashed together into a single post. Totally unrelated but one story kind of blends into the other...

20001001-042-camdenautox.jpg


13.7MB MPEG in-car video of AutoX run.

I AutoX my Subaru Impreza every weekend with the Philadelphia region of the Sports Car Club of America and got to talking with a cow-orker about a rather interesting problem that came up at a recent race. An acquaintance approached me and asked what he should do with the Glocks he was carrying concealed. They were secured in a fanny pack and he really had no idea what to do with them because SCCA rules say the cars must be completely empty when racing. No rules specific to guns, but all loose objects must be removed from the car and no dangerous objects are allowed (gas cans, even if secured and bolted down, are not allowed, etc.).

Both I and my co-driver are licensed to carry and wouldn't be racing until the next heat, so I suggested that we hold on to the pack while he race. Even though he worked at a range I frequent, saw my co-driver and myself on a weekly basis and was the person who sold me my 1911, he was a bit paranoid about letting the pack out of his sight for the hour he'd be on the track, which I can totally understand.

After another few minutes of converstation, he decided to keep the guns on him, hopped in the car and headed for the start line. So, we now have a car on the track with a fanny pack either on the driver or rattling around loose inside the cockpit as he navigates hairpins and slaloms at a high rate of speed. If reported, this probably would have gotten him banned from SCCA events due to safety concerns. This has nothing to do with guns per se; this has to do with potentially dangerous objects in the cockpit during a run. Check out the above video to see just what a car goes through during a run and see the damage a loose object could do in the cockpit.

So anyway, back to the flow of the story. I was discussing this with a cow-orker who stops by my cube every once in a while and talked about the dangers of having any loose objects in the cockpit. During my race on Sunday, the bungie cord that straps down my water bottle let loose and a liter of water fell into my lap going into turn one. Saying this broke my concentration would be an understatement as I overcorrected and just barely made the next gate.

We joked about my foolishness in having a loose bottle in the cockpit and the topic then changed to what I do with my 1911 when I race. Since the gun stays at home during competition weekends, it's really not an issue for me. And, if I did carry at events, I sure as heck would have my wife or co-driver keep them and not have them anywhere near the car while I was driving. It's just common sense...

Being the attention deficit fools that we are, the topic then jumped to my laser sight. Here comes part two of the story...

So there's this girl I work with who is completely incompetent and lacks common sense but is otherwise quite friendly. She and I have had gun debates before (she's anti-gun but really can't come up with a decent reason why) and she chimed in with, and I quote:

"Shouldn't laser sights be illegal? Lasers cause retinal damage and, if you pointed your gun at someone's face, you could hurt them."

End of quote. Duh. I could feel my IQ dropping just by hearing that statement. I stared at her in utter astonishment at the complete stupidity of that comment. Now, realize, I do know the extreme dangers of lasers and other high output light sources. I do know that even momentary exposure to a laser or laser diode can cause minimal eye damage. But...if a gun is pointed at someone's face, they have more to worry about than retinal damage from a laser sight.

Duh. I pulled out my laser pointer and showed it to her. I shined it on my hand. She then asked, "doesn't that hurt, isn't it burning you?" Ugh. I had to explain to her how the laser was simply a beam of focused light being emitted from a small diode. I then went on to explain to her that if I were to intentionally shine it in her eyes with the intent of causing damage, yes, it is illegal and could very well be considered assault.

She seemed confused. I could hear the gears crunching.

"So, it is illegal to point a laser sight at someone's face!"

I had to bite my lip. I explained in plain english that it was illegal to brandish a gun...period. I also had to explain that if I pointed it at someone, that in and of itself would be assault. I then had to go on to explain that, if I hypothetically sweeped someone's eyes with a laser sight when aiming at them, they have a heck of a lot more to worry about than eye damage.

"Never point a gun at something you do not intend to destroy." The conversation shifted to safety, and she was utterly amazed to find out that it was illegal to point a gun at someone just to scare them. I guess it also made her feel a bit better that most people with a carry permit are extremely careful and responsible about it.

Guh. I dunno. I'm sure this has just turned into a huge babbling rant, but I had to vent. Ack. I still realize that yes, getting hit in the eyes with a laser is a Bad Thing(tm), however that's not the point. :rolleyes:

/Sciri/

[This message has been edited by Sciri (edited October 03, 2000).]
 
Glad to see another autocrosser on here. :) I know what you mean about loose things flying around the interior during racing, and the fact that this person had guns in there with him? Im glad i race in the New York region :)

Good video BTW
 
Ha, thanks. Yeah, they're real strict around here with the tech inspection. Heck, my "Trunkmonkey Racing" mascott had trouble passing tech until I fastened him down in the front seat. If a little fuzzy thing won't pass tech unless fastened down, I don't think guns would. :D

20000924-002-camdenautox.jpg


/Sciri/
 
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Sciri: ... she was utterly amazed to find out that it was illegal to point a gun at someone just to scare them. I guess it also made her feel a bit better that most people with a carry permit are extremely careful and responsible about it ...[/quote]Soft-core (as opposed to 'hard-core') anti's are not really THE threat but just poor mis-guided souls ... when presented with the correct information, they become less of an enemy and may even become an ally.

FUD.
 
I autocrossed a bit, from the late '50s to the mid-'70s.

Seems to me that you know what you're gonna do on an autocross Sunday, right? And you know the rules about loose "stuff", right?

Seems to me that a tote-bag of some sort could be held down tightly by a rear-seat belt? Or via some rope or bungee cord in the trunk?

This younger degeneration is gettin' more worrisome by the day! And they let 'em have guns?

:), Art
 
FUD - Very true...all the conversations about guns I've had with her have ended up with her more or less agreeing with my point. That's why I say she's against guns, but really can't figure out why. It's like she agrees with all the safety/defense points I make but still doesn't like guns because she's "not supposed to" or something. Dunno.

Art - Yeah, he was driving a vehicle with a trunk, so he could have easily gone as far as to bungie it down in the spare tire well wrapped in his jacket. Someplace out of the way. But the last thing he said was specifically that he had to have them in sight. They could not be out of his sight/touch.

I'm all for carrying 24/7, but there is a limit on it. I can understand feeling naked without them like you do when you realize your keys or wallet aren't in your pockets, but keeping your guns in the cockpit while racing is outright paranoia. :D Oh no, those cones are going to come after you! Watch out! ;)

/Sciri/
 
You need the gun incase somebody bumps you or is crowding your lane!! you think there are bad drivers on the free-way, a race track must be road ragers heaven :D "honk honk, you moron, you're driving like your blind folded {flash your piece}, Learn to drive A##hole!!" :D hehe, good times :D

PS. Love the mascot, with the arms wrapped around the back of the seat, bu facing forward, he looks truly scared :)
 
And here in Texas you see two cowboys racing in pickups with a shotgun or Winchester in the window and that's not against the rules...

So how do you express road rage while racing if you don't have a gun?
 
Racing Subarus? Sounds as exciting as a light beer! Seriously, you could have had a V-8..thanks for the laugh, BTW do you narc all your friends on a the WWW? Why don't people mind their own business? Still laughing but shaking my head, so sad..henry
 
Sciri,
Sounds like she is ripe for the picking. Maybe you could invite her out shooting. Or if your married let your wife go with you and let your wife do the teaching. Trust me if your married take your wife. :) Who knows maybe she will just start saying, "I like guns, shooting is fun" and not really know why.
 
Henry - Hey, if I see someone doing something stupid, I speak out. Narc them out? Hardly. Going up to the race officials and saying, "hey, he's running with a gun in the car" would be narcing him out. And it became my business the minute he came up to me and said, "is it safe to run with guns in the car." I said no. He did it anyway. Duh.

Oh, and I routinely beat V8s with my baby H4 2.2 Subaru at the AutoX. Of course, those same V8s would romp my butt in a drag, but horsepower can be a disadvantage at the AutoX. Actually, the Subaru 2.5 RS wipes up at the AutoX in G Stock and Street Touring classes. The fastest car there is usually a 1978 VW Scirocco wiping the floor with all the muscle cars. ;)

L-Frame - If she's as bad with a gun as she is at the keyboard, I don't want to be anywhere near her when it goes off. I'd usually jump at the chance to take someone out, but...not her.

/Sciri/

[This message has been edited by Sciri (edited October 04, 2000).]
 
0021_L.jpg


Yeah, this Subaru looks about as exciting as light beer. :D Very light. Floating, even. Yeah, America might be great for the guns we can get our hands on and, although going downhill fast, the laws that protect our rights to own. But we really get crap versions of cars in the states. Subaru in the US - 167 HP. Subaru in Japan, 380 HP. Blah.

0019_L.jpg


/Sciri/

[This message has been edited by Sciri (edited October 04, 2000).]
 
Off Topic: Subaru rocks in World Rally Cup competition, I know because I've been getting the company's magazine ever since I bought my Legacy. WRC demands a lot more from both car and driver than pushing lead sleds round and round some NASCAR track. WRC has not been given a lot of TV exposure because they race on dirt backroads, where it's hard to set up air-conditioned sponsor booths and TV studios.
 
Mmmm.... Guns and Rally Cars. Now only if I were old enough to
a) own handguns
and b) insure a rally car for less than the GNP of some small countries
 
Around here we autocross on high school parking lots and airport runways.

No big deal with concealed carry at the schools since they are not inside the building. Though, at the airports I havn't been able to find out if i can legaly have them in that part of the airport so I leave them home since it isn't worth the hassel.

Anyway, here is my current autocross car:
www.atlcomputing.com/aaron/eclipse

Aaron.
 
Back
Top