Gameboy to hits the streets

LAK

Moderator
Mr Quinn says there are plans to replace the computer screen, joysticks and keypad in the remote-control unit with a Gameboy-style controller and virtual-reality goggles

Well, all those "nice lads" who spent all those years playing those gore-filled screen games can now find they have "needed skills". I wonder how long it will be before our Plantation managers have these to keep the slaves in order. I'll bet Comrade Blair can not wait to get these on the streets of Bradford, Leeds, Glasgow, and places like Northern Ireland etc ....

BBC News World Edition
Sunday, 23 January, 2005

US plans 'robot troops' for Iraq

The US military is planning to deploy robots armed with machine-guns to wage war against insurgents in Iraq.
Eighteen of the 1m-high robots, equipped with cameras and operated by remote control, are going to Iraq this spring, the Associated Press reports.

The machine is based on a robot already used by the military to disable bombs.

Officials say the robot warrior is fast, accurate and will track and attack the enemy with relatively little risk to the lives of US soldiers.

Unlike its human counterparts, the armed robot does not require food, clothing, training, motivation or a pension.

When not needed in war, it can be mothballed in a warehouse.

However, the robot will rely on its human operator, remotely studying footage from its cameras, for the order to open fire.

According to Bob Quinn, a manager with Foster-Miller, the US-based company which worked with the military to develop the robot, the only difference for a soldier is that "his weapon is not at his shoulder, it's up to half a mile away".

Test of metal

The robot fighter has been named Swords, after the acronym for Special Weapons Observation Reconnaissance Detection Systems.

Can be fitted with standard-issue M249 or M240 rifle
Has four cameras, night-vision and zoom lenses
Can travel over rocks and barbed wire
Batteries run for up to 4 hours at a time
Remote control unit has two joysticks and video screen
Costs $200,000 (£106,757) per unit

It is based on the Talon robot, which is widely used by the military to disarm bombs.

A US officer who helped test the robot said it was a more accurate shot than the average soldier because it is mounted on a stable platform and takes aim electronically.

"It eliminates the majority of shooting errors you have," said Staff Sgt Santiago Tordillos.

Mr Quinn says there are plans to replace the computer screen, joysticks and keypad in the remote-control unit with a Gameboy-style controller and virtual-reality goggles.

The Foster-Miller company is owned by the QinetiQ Group, a joint venture between the UK's Ministry of Defence and US-based holding company, Carlyle Group.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4199935.stm
 
No fair, they're using an aimbot. :p Seriously, is this going to be a wireless robot or are they going to have a cable. Either way is not ideal. Either having the cable cut or loosing the signal would be very bad. How fast can it turn the guns around if someone is sneaking up behind it. Could someone just put a big magnet on a gernade and toss it onto the robot. Even better, put a tripwire leading around the corner. Mabee it leads to a claymore, mabee not, the robot can't pass it to take a look. Overall I think this is mostly hype than really effective.
 
SWORDS:

ai20041206c1.jpg

T1:

l_1720794.jpg


Sweet.
 
I'd like to take this moment to tell Skynet that I would be useful in rooting out pockets of human resistance if I am spared.
 
No surprise. The USAF has been working on robot attack/fighter aircraft for years.
Any of you groundpounders out there notice that the controls for the turret of an M2 Bradley bear an odd resemblance to the controls of the old Star Wars arcade game- the real old one you sat in like an X-wing?
 
I love these types of news articles...bashing time =)

Hello everyone.™

Bashing time indeed.

Officials say the robot warrior is fast, accurate and will track and attack the enemy with relatively little risk to the lives of US soldiers.

Well...
1)Like how fast? A couple miles an hour when everyone else is hauling @$$?
2. How can it track targets? IR? well, what about places like Moab, Utah?
3. Accurate...Hum...I have my doubts...

"It eliminates the majority of shooting errors you have," said Staff Sgt Santiago Tordillos.

Like CQC?

:barf: The German Goliath (link) seemed better :barf:
 
These certainly aren't anything new. Destructo6's second photo may be nothing more than a sci-fi concept model - but the reality is that all the technology is there and has been for a good while. A long while.

All that is needed is the will and the money. The will is already there - the money will be forthcoming. The protoypes are out. ;)
 
Question.

I am all for these things taking my place in Iraq. I don't enjoy sweeping buildings, assisting raids, or running conoys.
My question is this:
What happens when these things show up in law enforcement? Then in schools (hall monitors?), then civilian security?
How are the operators going to determine locations of incoming sniper fire, booby traps, or car/suicide bombs any better than they do when actually there?
How many of these things can be destroyed/damaged/captured before guys like me are back on the ground?

Not flaming, just pointing out potential problems with the system that should be worked out PRIOR TO feilding, not during operations.
Otherwise it does look pretty unique. I imagine that, like bomb dissassembly robots, it will have lots of promise and will be a lifesaver, but what happens when the war is over?
 
Back
Top