OK, I know I'm risking flames from the 1911 crowd, but please follow my decision process here, and see if there's any reason this shouldn't be the right answer.
Just came into a small chunk of "free" money (DaimlerChrysler reimbursed me for repair work I had done long ago that later became a recall item. Thank you! Very honorable).
I like the idea of having one gun in what I consider each of the major mil/LE calibers - 38, 357, 9, 40, 45, and 223, 308, 7.62x39. On the handgun side, still "need" a .45
I have a G19 that is my car gun, a Kahr MK40 that is my new CCW gun. I want to upgrade my nightstand gun, and a G21 seems to fit because a) I want a .45 and b) the manual of arms is the same as / similar to the G19/MK40.
I don't have anything against 1911's, it's just that I like the idea of basically only having one way to operate a handgun if TSHTF.
Comments? Anyone think I'm making a major mistake here? Anyone think this is a good idea?
Just came into a small chunk of "free" money (DaimlerChrysler reimbursed me for repair work I had done long ago that later became a recall item. Thank you! Very honorable).
I like the idea of having one gun in what I consider each of the major mil/LE calibers - 38, 357, 9, 40, 45, and 223, 308, 7.62x39. On the handgun side, still "need" a .45
I have a G19 that is my car gun, a Kahr MK40 that is my new CCW gun. I want to upgrade my nightstand gun, and a G21 seems to fit because a) I want a .45 and b) the manual of arms is the same as / similar to the G19/MK40.
I don't have anything against 1911's, it's just that I like the idea of basically only having one way to operate a handgun if TSHTF.
Comments? Anyone think I'm making a major mistake here? Anyone think this is a good idea?