BTW: Old myths have circulated for years that "filing off" the disconnector will make a 1911 FA. This is not true, as the hammer merely follows the slide forward and doesn't impart enough force to overcome the inertia of the firing pin.
While true, in theory, I have seen that concept proven false in the past - at least on other platforms where you'd never expect a primer to be set off by the hammer following the slide.
The first time was when the sear rounded-over on a GI bring-back from China (suspected Khyber Pass origin, but I've only been able to get that close in the last 3-6 years - for 50+ years, it was believed to be a Chinese issue firearm). It's a blow-back .32 ACP with the weakest hammer spring I've ever seen. You can watch the hammer fall on this thing. Add to it the fact that the geometry is all wrong, and you'd never expect a hammer-following incident to set off a primer.
Yet, when my grandfather pulled the trigger on a fresh magazine about 20 years ago, it ran away. Straight full-auto and no stopping it until the ammunition was exhausted.
(I'll try to get a photo, or the actual handgun, soon. I need to go stack some firewood for him, anyway.)
The second time, was a Browning Buckmark with a bad disconnector/trigger link. Hammer followed slide. Random burst fire resulted. Three-shot burst. Five-shot burst. Two-shot burst. Whatever the disconnector felt like allowing, before doing its job again. And, it should be noted, occasionally the hammer would follow the slide but fail to set off the primer.
Many people have tried to illegally modify Buckmarks to make them run full-auto - generally unsuccessfully. But, that one (a Silhouette model) would pump all kinds of lead out, fairly predictably, until the disconnector got replaced.
In a 1911, you'd have to have quite a few problems, for the hammer to be able to follow the slide without getting stopped short. ...But it is possible.