IowaShooter
Inactive
Which .22 is more accurate?
1) New Taurus TX22 16+1
2) Ruger MKIII 22/45 lite (with a boatload of Tandemkross aftermarket upgrades) and Holosun red dot
3) Hi-Standard Sport King 100 Lightweight (circa 1955)
Well... I shot at 21' outdoors... 30 rds (fairly fast fire, two handed) using some copper-plated bulk hollow point and some standard velocity CCI LRN (same number in each gun)
Observations:
Triggers are great in all three
The three white dots are a bit small on the Taurus sights (especially in low light... It was overcast outside and I was under the 3-sided pistol range building)
The Holosun is easy on these old eyes
The blade sight on the SK-100 is precise
All these go where aimed... Each shoot better than me
I'd need to put them on a rest to really see which is better
Balance and grip, while different on each, is good on each
If I had to choose 3 semi-auto .22s ... I'd choose these again
My wife's Ruger SR22 didn't make the trip... But would give these a run for their money
1) New Taurus TX22 16+1
2) Ruger MKIII 22/45 lite (with a boatload of Tandemkross aftermarket upgrades) and Holosun red dot
3) Hi-Standard Sport King 100 Lightweight (circa 1955)
Well... I shot at 21' outdoors... 30 rds (fairly fast fire, two handed) using some copper-plated bulk hollow point and some standard velocity CCI LRN (same number in each gun)
Observations:
Triggers are great in all three
The three white dots are a bit small on the Taurus sights (especially in low light... It was overcast outside and I was under the 3-sided pistol range building)
The Holosun is easy on these old eyes
The blade sight on the SK-100 is precise
All these go where aimed... Each shoot better than me
I'd need to put them on a rest to really see which is better
Balance and grip, while different on each, is good on each
If I had to choose 3 semi-auto .22s ... I'd choose these again
My wife's Ruger SR22 didn't make the trip... But would give these a run for their money