I saw recently where over in Kalifornia they arrested someone for DUI on a *horse*. At worse, that should be just public intoxication. Back when I was stationed in the Norfolk area, the cops were big on charging someone with public intoxication even if they were driving because whereas with DUI, they needed to show that the driver had a BAC above a certain point, with public intoxication, it was entirely based on the impression of the officer. No proof involved, so it allowed them to charge anyone that they didn't like with it. And back then, a lot of the cops just did not like people in the military...
"Sailors and dogs keep off the grass!"
I think we should just flush every law that came after the Bill of Rights and start over. We should make it so that in order to enact a law that it required more than just a majority vote. Maybe a 75% vote, still subject to a veto and to override the veto, the legislators would need 90%. Same for constitutional amendments. If the legislators can't overwhelmingly agree that something should be prohibited, then we shouldn't be making rules against it.