For your critique or correction:

Monkeyleg

New member
The following is something I wrote to have printed up and hand out at hunter sight-ins and gun shops before the election. If anyone has any advice or corrections, I'd appreciate hearing them.

GUN OWNERS: WHAT'S IN STORE UNDER GORE

1. Licensing. Al Gore has promised to require purchasers of handguns to pass a government-run test, to be fingerprinted, photographed and licensed. Why? Why treat honest citizens like criminals when he knows full well that criminals won’t get licensed? Gun owners in New York and California have learned about licensing the hard way, as they wait weeks and even months to get their licenses, and have the fees increase to the point where the average working man can’t afford it. Gore is taking his orders from Handgun Control Inc and trying to implement a strategy that worked so well in Great Britain, Canada and Australia: require licensing, then raise the fees to the point where few people can afford the licenses. Then, when crime still hasn’t fallen, require gun owners to register their guns. Then, when that doesn’t stop crime, confiscate the registered guns.

2. Further gun bans. Gore has promised to ban “assault weapons.” Is he looking to expand upon the list of rifles and shotguns that were banned in the 1994 crime bill? Or is he looking to confiscate the AR15’s, SKS’s, M1’s and other guns that were grandfathered in under the bill? Last September, on Larry King Live, Gore even said he would favor banning 9 millimeter and .380 caliber handguns.

3. Gun Shows. Gore has promised to close the “gun show loophole.” You and I know there is no loophole. Every licensed dealer at a gun show has to do the same background checks that a gun store does. Gore’s plan would effectively end the private sales of guns. Want to sell a gun to your friend? You’ll have to go through the background check and waiting period. And, despite the fact that the Brady Law requires that all records of a transaction be destroyed once the background check has been completed, the Clinton/Gore administration has been violating the law by keeping those records in an FBI database.

4. Registration. Gore has promised to enact what he calls “supertracing” of guns by the BATF. This is a backdoor way of registering guns by requiring the manufacturer to record the name of the dealer who
purchased a gun along with the name of the citizen who finally bought it, and supply these names to the BATF.

5. The Emerson Case. Last year a Dr. Emerson was arrested in Texas for violating a little-known provision of the 1994 Crime Bill called the Lautenberg amendment. Emerson’s case went before a federal judge who declared that the amendment violated Emerson’s Second Amendment rights. The Clinton/Gore administration appealed that decision and the appeal is now before the 5th Circuit Court of appeals. The case may well go to the Supreme Court, where a definitive decision on the Second Amendment may finally be made. In the first few days of arguments at the 5th Circuit Court, attorneys for the Clinton/Gore Justice Department stated that it is the position of the Clinton/Gore administration that the only people who have a right to own guns are members of the National Guard, and only when those guardsmen are on active duty!

6. The Supreme Court. The next president will appoint as many as four new Supreme Court justices to replace those who will be retiring in the next couple of years. Can we afford to have justices who will rule that the only people who have a right to own guns are the National Guard?

This election is the most important one that gun owners have ever faced. Al Gore has made it clear that he stands with Handgun Control and other groups in their effort to eventually disarm America.

IF YOU CARE ABOUT YOUR GUNS, YOU CANNOT AFFORD TO LET AL GORE BE ELECTED!
VOTE, AND MAKE SURE YOUR GUN OWNER FRIENDS VOTE FOR GUN RIGHTS!


Dick
Want to send a message to Bush? Sign the petition at http://www.petitiononline.com/monk/petition.html and forward the link to every gun owner you know.
 
Check out my post at: Aussie Laws and read the entire thread, which meshes with your intent.

I printed out a set of forms needed for an individual to own/buy a firearms (including the one allowing the police to enter your premises) from the Northern Territory URLs.

I also went to http://www.hodgdon.com/news/index.htm and looked under "News" where they had an ad that was appearing in Canadian magazines about registering your firearms.

I then went to Staples (like Office Max) and had them Xerox the forms etc. double-sided for just a few bucks.

I was up at the Lee Kay range in Utah and handed them to the guys behind the counter. I asked them to give them to their non-voting or Gore-voting gun owners with the request that they start practicing filling out the forms so they'll know what to do if Gore gets in. Many muttered calls to the Almighty as they thumbed through the 5 pages.

I got the same reaction when I handed some out at a major gun store in Ogden.

My best wishes to you in your efforts. If each one of us did this in our own locality, it just might save that particular state.

BTW, here's a snippet from a canadian friend of mine:
">BTW, I read that your govt is threatening gun owners who don't register
>their guns under C68 will face a $60 PER GUN registration fee next year >instead of the existing $10.

Hmmm, that disagrees with the info I've seen--the latest brochure on licensing arrived in the mail last week. Owners have until Dec 31/2002 to register their firearms and can do so for a bulk fee of $18. The $10/$60 fees pertain to the Possession/Acquisition/Ammo licences which are a separate deal. These can currently be obtained for $10, but go up to $60 on Oct. 15th. this year."

So there you have it. If any of those above-mentioned gun-owners don't get rattled they sure as Hell qualify for a Texas "Justified a$$whuppin".
 
You may want to point out that one of the next targets (no pun intended) would be sniper rifles. "Well, I ain't got one of those," Joe Six-pack says. If you have a deer rifle, you do.

Ask them if they trust a government that doesn't trust them.
 
Dont forget to ask them if they fancy bending over forward for gore concerning licensing & registration of all firearms.
Sure hand gunners will get gored first, but then its the riflemens turn for a good goreing out.

Vote freedom first
Vote your guns
Vote Bush or
kiss your guns goodbye.
 
Monkeyleg - nice work. I noticed that you mentioned the Lautenberg amendment as beiong part of the 1994 Crime Bill. Are you sure you aren't confusing the 1999 attempt at eliminating private sales (which was sponsored in the Senate by Lautenberg) with the 1994 Omnibus Crime bill?

I think the attempt to ban "sniper rifles" is one that many hunters will recognize as a threat. Check legislation proposed by Ron Blagojevich (Illinois) for examples of such "anti-sniper rifle" legislation.

I always give more credibility to a statement if it is backed up with a source. A quick link to the Internet can let those who want to check up on your facts educate themselves better and learn more than you can get out in a brief one-page handout.

I would add links relevant to the point you are making. I think the links to the registration forms for California and Australia would be great as "examples" of what Al Gore has in mind for us as well.

Last but not least, I would try and work in that the Supreme Court ruled in U.S. vs. Haynes (1968) that criminals are legally exempt from both licensing and registration because it violates their 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination.

In other words, if you have 5 convictions for violent felony crimes, you can't be charged for not having a firearms license.
If you are a once-a-year hunter who didn't have time to get your license renewed before the season, you are going to jail on a felony crime.


[This message has been edited by Bartholomew Roberts (edited October 16, 2000).]
 
Thanks, all. Some good advice.

Bartholomew, the Lautenberg amendment that Emerson was tried on was the one that prevented anyone who had pled guilty to a domestic violence charge or who was under a restraining order from owning a firearm. I know the amendment is older than a year, and I had thought it was part of the 1994 Omnibus crime bill. I'll check it out.

Dick
Want to send a message to Bush? Sign the petition at http://www.petitiononline.com/monk/petition.html and forward the link to every gun owner you know.
 
Back
Top