Iam familiar with neither the publication mentioned below, or with the byline owner, nor with the legislator named, however if there is any truth whatever in the article, I'm given to note that it does have a "certain ring".
From Utne Reader
A Vermont state legislator has introduced a bill that would require unarmed citizens to pay a $500 fine "for the privilege of not owning a gun," reports Joanna Mareth in The American Prospect (March 27, 2000). Should the bill become law, gunless Vermonters would be required to register with the state as non-gun owners; those of military age who are not serving in the armed forces or police force would be subject to the fine. The bill's sponsor, Representative Fred Maslack, says the law is not designed to protect citizens from crime, but to make sure each citizen assumes responsibility for protecting the state from hostile invaders. "There is a legitimate government interest in knowing who is prepared to defend the state should they be asked to do so," he explains.
[This message has been edited by alan (edited October 07, 2000).]
From Utne Reader
A Vermont state legislator has introduced a bill that would require unarmed citizens to pay a $500 fine "for the privilege of not owning a gun," reports Joanna Mareth in The American Prospect (March 27, 2000). Should the bill become law, gunless Vermonters would be required to register with the state as non-gun owners; those of military age who are not serving in the armed forces or police force would be subject to the fine. The bill's sponsor, Representative Fred Maslack, says the law is not designed to protect citizens from crime, but to make sure each citizen assumes responsibility for protecting the state from hostile invaders. "There is a legitimate government interest in knowing who is prepared to defend the state should they be asked to do so," he explains.
[This message has been edited by alan (edited October 07, 2000).]