Bad form deserved.
It's considered bad form to refer to a specific member in a thread title.
True, it's not polite, but at the same time it's deserved. The member in question has repeatedly hijacked threads to spout his anti-Paul rants, sometimes with only loose relation to the topic at hand. THAT is bad form also, and sometimes folks just need to be held accountable by their peers. Better to have your peers warn you than have the mods slam you, as stated in the sticky at the top of L&P.
For evidence of this behavior, check out his posts in the Liberty Dollar thread. Ron Paul and Liberty Dollar may be related, sure, but it was NOT the topic of the thread. It was turned into, by Fremmer AND OTHERS, an anti-Paul spout.
This thread is not about Fremmer in particular, but all of the anti-Paul members who have dismissed one option without suggesting another. This is their place to tell us all why not Paul and who the alternative is to them. I think this will be a welcome discussion as I've not decided on any one particular candidate yet, and would like to hear some information.
In regards to the topic of this thread, however, I believe that of the potentials making any news at all, Huckabee may be the best choice after Paul. His veiws on most issues are conservative without being extremist. He might have enough common ground with both sides to get traditional Conservatives and neo-cons on the same page, or at least in the same chapter.
Unfortunately, I fear that the Repulicans will nominate Giuliani based soley on popularity/name recognition, without regard to his stand on any current issues, which seem to be more in line with those of the Democratic ticket in almost all cases.
