Posted by "Noz"
Several years ago I decided that my life would be complete if I only owned a 36 cal Flintlock. I found a Pedersoli.
I then found out why they always show the mountain men going into the wilds with two horses.
It takes the second horse to carry all the stuff necessary to keep a flinter running.
After many frustrating attempts at a successful shooting session, I traded it for a 45 cal TC sidelock.
The Pedersoli is one of the few guns I have owned and either sold or traded that I don't want back. I really came to hate it.
That's one of the problems and why flintlocks are often looked down upon as being problematic. I started in BP with a CVA Kentucky flinter in .45, I worked on that thing ... pretty much completely rebuilt the lock and trigger to get it functioning just half decent. Thing is, I liked the idea of flintlocks so much, I stayed with it and I'm glad I did because once I started building guns from scratch using high-quality parts, it's a whole different world!
Despite the fact that the quality of the locks I use now come out of the box in better condition than anything the mass-production companies like Pedercrappi could ever even think about producing, by the time I put the finish tuning on them, my flintlocks fire as fast, and often faster, than sidelock percussion guns because there's no flash channel to contend with.
I got screwed royally on a Pedercrappi myself, it cost more than 25 times what the CVA did and was totally worthless, at least the CVA had a good barrel, the Pedercrappi barrels were worthless (.72 rifled & 10ga that were anything but the smoothbores they were supposed to be).
Please don't judge all flintlocks based upon the utter junk that comes from the mass-production companies.
.54 x 1:66
.54 x 1:66
.36 PRB @ 80yds (two in white are from a .45)