Filibuster Broken; Gun Control Advances

Status
Not open for further replies.

dZ

New member
Senator Lott's Betrayal of Gun Owners Nearly Complete
-- Majority Leader rolls Sen. Smith and moves gun control forward

Gun Owners of America E-Mail/FAX Alert
8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102, Springfield, VA 22151
Phone: 703-321-8585 / FAX: 703-321-8408 http://www.gunowners.org

"On the juvenile justice bill [S. 254], I could have gone through
all kinds of contortions and gyrations to try to block that, but I
thought . . . we ought to take it up. . . . I didn't run around out
here trying to block [the anti-gun amendments]. Some of my
colleagues said I should have done that." --Majority Leader Trent
Lott on his role in pushing the anti-gun crime bill, July 26, 1999


(Thursday, July 29, 1999) -- It's official. Majority Leader Trent
Lott has finally succeeded in breaking Senator Bob Smith's
stranglehold on the anti-gun crime bill and has sent the bill
forward to its next destination in the legislative process.

The Senate voted 77-22 yesterday to break Senator Bob Smith's
filibuster and then moved to send the legislation to a conference
committee that will iron out the differences between the House and
Senate crime bills.

The Senate rules would have allowed Smith (I-NH) to continue
filibustering the gun bill if he could garner 41 Senators to support
him. Smith fell 19 votes short of stopping the Gore-Lautenberg gun
control bill.

Ironically, Democratic Minority Leader Tom Daschle (SD) praised
Senator Lott for his leadership on this legislation. "I will say I
support the effort made by the majority leader to move this bill to
conference and the method he has employed to do so," Daschle said.
"We have had a very good debate on this bill. [Democrats] have had
an opportunity to offer amendments. I cite S. 254 as the model I
wish we would follow on all bills."

Indeed, Senator Lott has been instrumental in moving this gun
control legislation at every point along the way. Consider that the
Majority Leader:

* Scheduled a vote on a crime bill during the midst of the
hysteria following the Columbine shooting in May;

* Voted for several of the anti-gun provisions when they were
offered as amendments to the bill;

* Voted for final passage of the anti-gun S. 254 on May 20;

* Jump-started the whole gun control debate again this month by
taking the anti-gun Senate language (S. 254) and substituting it in
place of the relatively innocuous House crime bill (H.R. 1501);

* Dusted off his arsenal of parliamentary tricks to prevent
Senator Smith from offering constructive amendments to the crime
bill during yesterday's vote;

* Voted against the Smith filibuster yesterday; and finally,

* Allowed the Senate to send notoriously anti-gun Senators like
Ted Kennedy and Patrick Leahy to conduct negotiations in the
conference committee, while specifically excluding Senator Bob
Smith, who is also a member of the Judiciary Committee.

While Senator Smith promised yesterday to filibuster the bill once
it clears the conference committee, Senate rules will greatly
restrict his parliamentary options for delaying the bill. [The
Senate conferees are Hatch (R-UT), Kennedy (MA), Leahy (VT),
Sessions (AL), and Thurmond (R-SC).]

At this point, no one knows how long the crime legislation will
remain in the conference committee. It is possible that it will
remain there until after the August recess. Eventually, both
Congressional houses will have to vote on an identical bill before
they can send it to the President.

Gun owners will stand the best chance at defeating this legislation
in the House, seeing as how they succeeded in getting that body to
defeat similar legislation (H.R. 2122) in May. Please stay tuned
for further updates.


Senator Smith Responds To Senators After Yesterday's Vote

On Missing The Real Problem In Society. "What happened at Littleton
was a terrible tragedy. People used this on the Senate floor and
mounted an unprecedented assault on the second amendment rights of
law-abiding American gun owners. Not one law-abiding American
citizen had anything to do with Columbine, not one. . . . They cast
the blame, though, on the law-abiding gun owner . . . . The problem
is guns, they said, not the culture. It is interesting that we take
prayer and values out of the schools. What comes in? Violence,
drugs, condoms. Hello, America, wake up." --Congressional Record,
July 28, 1999

On Trampling The Constitution. "[The Second Amendment] is pretty
clear: 'A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security
of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms,
shall not be infringed.' Tell me where there is anything in that
amendment that allows us to do this under the Constitution of the
United States of America? I stood right there where the pages are
sitting and took the oath twice when I came to the Senate to protect
and defend the Constitution of the United States, and that is what I
am doing now, and that is what I will continue to do.

"There is nothing in those words about background checks. There is
nothing in there about the people having a right to keep and bear
certain kinds of arms. There is nothing in there that says handguns
can be kept or not kept where shotguns can. Nothing. I sure do not
see anything in there that gives Congress any leeway whatsoever to
infringe second amendment rights whenever some group of anti-gun
zealots think what they like to call the 'public interest' requires
it. The public interest is to preserve and protect the Constitution
of the United States of America. That is what the public interest is
and nothing else. You trample on the Constitution; you trample on
the public interest." --Congressional Record, July 28, 1999

On His Intent To Continue Filibustering The Anti-gun Crime Bill. "I
am proud to stand up for the second amendment in the Chamber of the
Senate, and I will stand up here again and again, year after year,
month after month, whatever it takes to make this case because I
know I am right, and I am going to continue to do it. When this bill
[S. 254] comes out of conference, I am going to filibuster it again
for as long as I can. I am going to do everything I can to kill it,
whatever I can do. I am only one person." --Cong. Record, July 28,
1999


How Senators Voted On Your Gun Rights:

Listed below are the 77 Senators who voted AGAINST the Smith
filibuster and
in favor of sending the anti-gun crime bill to a House-Senate
conference committee.

Abraham (MI) Feinstein (CA) McCain (AZ)
Akaka (HI) Fitzgerald (IL) McConnell (KY)
Ashcroft (MO) Frist (TN) Mikulski (MD)
Baucus (MT) Gorton (WA) Moynihan (NY)
Bayh (IN) Graham (FL) Murkowski (AK)
Bennett (UT) Gregg (NH) Murray (WA)
Biden (DE) Hagel (NE) Reed (RI)
Bingaman (NM) Harkin (IA) Reid (NV)
Bond (MO) Hatch (UT) Robb (VA)
Boxer (CA) Hollings (SC) Roberts (KS)
Breaux (LA) Inouye (HI) Rockefeller (WV)
Bryan (NV) Jeffords (VT) Roth (DE)
Byrd (WV) Johnson (SD) Sarbanes (MD)
Chafee (RI) Kennedy (MA) Schumer (NY)
Cleland (GA) Kerrey (NE) Sessions (AL)
Cochran (MS) Kerry (MA) Smith (OR)
Collins (ME) Kohl (WI) Snowe (ME)
Conrad (ND) Landrieu (LA) Specter (PA)
Daschle (SD) Lautenberg (NJ) Stevens (AK)
DeWine (OH) Leahy (VT) Thompson (TN)
Dodd (CT) Levin (MI) Thurmond (SC)
Domenici (NM) Lieberman (CT) Torricelli (NJ)
Dorgan (ND) Lincoln (AR) Warner (VA)
Durbin (IL) Lott (MS) Wellstone (MN)
Edwards (NC) Lugar (IN) Wyden (OR)
Feingold (WI) Mack (FL)

**************
Cheaper Than Dirt donates a percentage of your total order to GOA if
you use http://www.cheaperthandirt.com/goa.htm to enter their online
store.

**************
Did someone else forward this to you? To be certain of getting up to
date information, please consider subscribing to the GOA E-Mail
Alert Network directly. There is no cost or obligation, and the
volume of mail is quite low. To subscribe, simply send a message to
goamail@gunowners.org and include the state in which you live, in
either the subject or the body. To unsubscribe, reply to any alert
and ask to be removed.
 
I wonder if Senators McCain and Hatch even remember the first time they sold out...


------------------
John/az

"The middle of the road between the extremes of good and evil, is evil. When freedom is at stake, your silence is not golden, it's yellow..."
 
And people still believe that supporting the Republican traitors is in a gun owner's best interest?
 
HM3,

I prefer "Treasonous Rat-Bastards," but hey, whatever works for you.

------------------
A vote for the lesser of two evils is still a vote for evil.
Vote Libertarian - For A Change.
 
I have been saying this all along about the vast majority of Republicraps. They are as traitorous as the Demarats and people like Hatch and Mccain are below contempt. I dont want to hear it about McCain being a war hero! I am afraid to print what i really think should be done to these traitors. I feel like one of those old Romans waiting for the destruction of my once great nation.How anyone can feel that there is a chance that the people can get the country back is beyond me. These Senators could give lessons to the Mafia on how to milk the people dry not only of their money ,but also of their freedoms. Senator Smith is a good man and I am glad he is getting away from that evil institution called the US Senate. He is walking away from the graft that made these Senators millionares. That is why the founders did not want Senators to be popularly elected. The Senators were to be the watchdogs or counterbalance to the Federal government. That is why until 1913 the Senate was elected by state legislatures. These Senators dont give a damn about being a counterbalance to the Federal Govenment.They are popularly elected and are in the pay of the many special interests groups. And these senators have 6 year terms and can be reelected at will with specially interest money. Look at the long terms of most of these creatures. Yes, 1913 was a watershed year for America. In one year the plutocrats gave us a popularly elected Senate, the Federal Reserve System, and the start of the income tax system. I know that was a long time ago,but the results are near slavery today for the indentured American citzens. You dont have to be in chains to be a slave.
 
I wrote the Okie Senators since I am from there. I now live in Texas and the Texas delegation represented their people well also.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top