Fight, a beating that won't stop!

K

KS.45

New member
An instructor I know poses this scenario to his CC classes in Kansas.

There are 2 men (call then A & B) in a fist fight, B is now on ground and obviously not defending himself. A is astride B's chest and still pouring it on full force to the guys head. It now looks like B could be beaten to death.

You are a witness and licensed to carry. What do you say and/or do?
 
let him know you have called 911 and the police are on the way. stay out of it unless he decides to come after you. When a perp hears the cops are on the way they dont want to be there when they get there.
 
First off you don't know who started it, and that may make a big difference in your jurisdiction. In any case, you might not want to skip right to deadly force, but I would certainly intervene. Than again, I am 5'11 and 230lb, pretty fit, If I was 5'1 and 130lb I doubt I would do anything but call 911.
 
The instructor's answer is to get 911 called, loudly ask a witness to do it if there are any. Verbally warn the aggressor, LOUDLY. End your statement to him with "Don't make me shoot you!"

Maintain control of your line of fire, do not intervene physically by shoving or kicking the aggressor.

If the threat to life is clear to you and there is no stopping the agressor verbally ... shoot the aggressor when you have a good shot that won't endanger others.

If B dies with you doing nothing but getting 911 called and it becomes known that you were carrying, you might be subject to civil action by B's family. If you shoot the agressor, the same thing may also happen, he will have a family too.

The instructor remarked that this is one of the things that that people don't often think about when they decide to CC. It's more than just you and your family that can be involved.

Always know that you can and will be sued in a deadly force situation. The more you are worth, the more likely it is that a lawyer will take the lawsuit on contingency. Even if you are cleared on the shooting by the police and/or DA.
 
That depends on where you are. In Ohio you may use force to defend someone if they would be justified in useing force if they could. That person must have had no part in creating or escalating the assault. That includes verbally.
I might pull him off, but no way I'd use my CCW. Even after pulling him off and he goes after me. It's a big risk because in Ohio it doesn't matter that you didn't know the situation, you are still responcible.
 
Let's try this. You are C.

A is the one who attacked B.

B got the upper hand is now furiously beating the life out of A.

If you allow B to kill A then you are technically accessory to murder. The law may not charge you as such, but your lack of prevention in a killing makes you guilty just the same.

You have the duty to shoot to wound B. You aren't shooting to kill. You are shooting to stop the threat. If B dies from his wounds...so be it. That is what he gets for attempting to take the life of another.

A may be a scumbag, but B has no right to take A's life after he is obvious no longer a threat to B. A is beaten and B must cease his attack.

I say shoot B if needed to save A's life....even if A doesn't deserve it. That is what makes us better than A. C must rise above the level that A and B reside on.
 
Either way in Kansas, if you have the capacity to defend a life, you can do it. Of course, the issue can go to what witnesses say in court.

But the fact remains you shoot, you don't endanger others by putting yourself in a position where your weapon could become a danger to anyone but the aggressor.

It's a situation fraught with "what ifs" and the advice was to focus on the immediate danger to human life and the need to stop the threat.

I think that putting the sights on the agressor's head and blowing his brains out might be seen by some as "over the top". But the danger to life needs to end once it is recognized.

This is the one thing about the class that gave me the most thought. It's a disturbing thing to contemplate when the implications are taken into account.
 
If B dies with you doing nothing but getting 911 called and it becomes known that you were carrying, you might be subject to civil action by B's family.
Click to expand...

Maybe that is Kansas law, I don't know, because I haven't read the Kansas CCW laws, but it is not that way everywhere. In our CCW class here we were told that we can use our weapon in defense of others if they are in extreme physical danger but- we are not in any way Law Enforcement.

For this situation though, after calling 911, if it looks like "B" is in danger of being killed then the Kansas instructors answer is a good one.

If you allow B to kill A then you are technically accessory to murder. The law may not charge you as such, but your lack of prevention in a killing makes you guilty just the same.
Click to expand...

Wow, I don't see that anywhere in the law.
 
In civil law, you generally must render lifesaving aid to those in need if you have the ability to help. That is true in this situation until the police arrive.

When the cops get there, put the gun on the floor and follow the nice cop's instructions. Have a cooperative attitude. But say only how glad you are they are there and tell them only: 1. ID info, 2. You are licensed to carry. 3. You had to act to save a life.

Say you want to make no other statement without advice of counsel. Other than that, shut up and contact an attorney.
 
Wow, I don't see that anywhere in the law.
Click to expand...
I think he is referring to a higher law

It is very plausible the A has lost himself in a moment of adrenaline induce fury
He may have just been in a fight for his life and the off switch has malfed for a moment
Simply diverting his attention momentarily may be enough to snap him out of it

If not you may have to shoot him

Last I cecked Florida did not have a good Samaritan law and our new law immunes of from prosecution and civil liability if we rightfully shoot someone

Figuring the instructors comments into the law suit risk assessment it would be better for me to shoot the guy
 
The shouted verbal warning, and a laser dot. That's what the aggressor gets from me and the G36.

The next thing is bang.

And I pray this is something that never happens to me.
 
Wow, I don't see that anywhere in the law.

I think he is referring to a higher law
Click to expand...

That could be, and then that would be between you and you maker. The problem here is unless you are covered by good samaritan laws (and possibly even if you are) it's a no win situation for "C".

Ks.45, that laser dot could be a real attention getter!
 
You have the duty to shoot to wound B. You aren't shooting to kill. You are shooting to stop the threat. If B dies from his wounds...so be it. That is what he gets for attempting to take the life of another.
Click to expand...

You don't have a "duty" to shoot anyone. Secondly, there is no shooting to "wound". A firearm is to be considered lethal force and DEATH is to be a highly anticipated outcome. These scenerios you create are not completely based in reality.
 
hue and cry

Yesterday on another thread someone asked me how failing to intervene could expose one to civil liability. This is an old principle of common law, and it may vary by state, but you will probably get sued if someone dies, one way or another. I'd rather be hung for a ram than a sheep.
Certainly, I would feel a moral obligation to intervene.
In my youth, I was involved in some civil disobedience that used nonviolence as a tactic.
Nonviolence as a way of life includes be ready and able to stop violence when I see it.
 
If you have the ability to assist and do not, you can be held liable for the outcome as easily as not. It's law based on neglect and indifference. Decisions like it are made often in civil litigation. Cases of this sort make the news commonly.

What's your explanation jlwman? Why is this not true?
 
Many years ago, 1960! sounds like a fairy tale, while working as a very new and inexperienced Doorman (Bouncer) in the UK, the exact scene described was taking place in a converted wine cellar in Liverpool, in my wisdom, lack of! I gripped aggressor, to pull him off... blow to my back, I had been stabbed.

Back to drawing board, new me, same situation, it happened a few times, first arrive mob handed, at least 4 of us, "Stand back" gain some space, kick with right foot, in to right kidney area, extract the two ex scrappers, dump in street. I worked there for 4 years, just a part time night job, new family, new house, extra cash. A lot of fights, you learn quick.
 
This goes back to something we pointed out a few weeks before.

You don't cease being the victim just because you're winning.

The guy on the ground might be a jacker with poor fighting skills.

From that standpoint, stopping the fight in any way means the felon might successfully attempt a counter-attack. Meaning it may have been better to let the winner finish him off.

For the sake of the debate, my opinion is that you do not have enough info to do anything but call the police.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top