Feinstein Denies Americans Right To Protect Their Families

[expeditionx]

Feinstein Denies Americans Right To Protect Their Families


With enough proper media exposure a headline like this in enough major newspapers could turn the tide of anti-gun support.

The media loves to scare the public. And scared people will usually resolve to take measures. If Americans even became aware of what Feinstein and a few anti-gun associations were trying to do it would be over.

There really needs to be more journalists willing to blow the whistle on the anti-gunners. Trying to disarm defenseless woman so thieves, rapists, and serial killers can be free of worry when they want to commit crimes.

To all naysayers I say this: politics is about public image, alot of laws are created uselessly because of public ignorance, and fear is being used as an effective tactic against gun ownership/it can be used for gun support as well.

Think of the children could even be used to strengthen the fear that an unarmed household might suffer from intruders.

Ak-47s are very effective defense weapons to protect your family.
Who wants an ineffective home defense weapon.

Can anyone imagine feinstein and kennedy turning pale as they see a major headline that clamps on to their political leg as a proverbial pit bull.

If enough journalists with the stones to do it stepped foward guncontrol might become a dirty word. Think of the children mrs. feinstein

 

[Greg Bell]

k-47s are very effective defense weapons to protect your family.
Who wants an ineffective home defense weapon.

Amen!

 

[alan]

Has anyone ever asked DiFi where she thought the armed security she enjoys came from? I wonder. As interesting as her answer might be, the answers perhaps obtained from her fellow travelers in The House and Senate, might prove even more intreresting.

What might one actually hear from these anti gun/anti civil rights/anti self defense types in The House and Senate, all of whom enjoy armed security, provided by "lesser folk", paid for by us mere mortals, those whose rights DIFi and like minded others, hold in such low regard.

Something to perhaps think on.

 

[45 Long Colt]

If enough journalists with the stones to do it stepped foward. . .

That kind of says it all. Journalists don't have ANY stones these days: what they do have is knee-jerk left-wing liberal fuzzy-wuzzy "convictions".

Since they are without stones, they can't imagine responding to an assault with effective, forceful and potentially fatal violence. Also, they've been conditioned to admire "diversity." But they don't admire it when it entails a person like me, who is diverse in terms of being armed and very unwilling to take crap off of punks of any stripe.

Over 90% of journalists describe themselves as liberal Democrats. That also says it all.

 

[Bud Helms]

Duplicate threads in L&P and Gen Discussion merged. Moved to Legal & Political.

 

[Mesquite]

I'd personally like to see people that deny others the right of self defense become a victim of a violent crime.

 

[jefnvk]

I have a simple soluion for everything. They may not be sane, but they are all simple. For this situtation: Everyone (non-military) follows the same weapon laws. If I don't get a greater than 10-round clip, the police don't. If I can't buy an NFA AK for $400, the police cant. If I don't get to concealed carry anywhere in the United States when I'm 18, Feinstein doesn't get her bodyguards or her CCW, oe whatever she has. Soon, without their protection, the 'representitives' may see the erro in their way. If not, they are still as defenseless as I.