Feinstein all but concedes defeat - for now

wingedmonkey

Inactive
Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), the champion of the ill-conceived "assault weapons" ban appears to have essentially given up on getting a renewal passed before the ban expires in September, acknowledging that, "while the ban has 52 votes in its favor in the Senate, it is unlikely to pass in the House of Representatives."

While she may very well proceed with another attempt to get a renewal passed in the Senate, she is well aware that the House has expressed no interest in bringing the measure up, and even if it does make it to the floor, Rep. Tom DeLay (R-TX) is confident the votes "are not there" for the bill to succeed.

Feinstein is reportedly "looking toward November's elections to produce a president and a House leadership more supportive of gun control" and plans to launch a "nationwide effort" next year to pass a ban "similar" to (translation: more restrictive than) the current ban.

While it would be foolish to take her statements at face value, and assume that we have indeed won this round, it should be noted that the upcoming elections will be every bit as crucial to the 2002 elections that gave us the current congress. This battle will not be over on September 13th. The anti-gun crowd will be boiling over with bitterness over having lost on this issue, and will be lashing out to whoever is willing to listen.

At this point, the only hope for revitalizing the gun control movement, which has been foundering for several years, will be to get John Kerry elected president, and/or gain a significant number of seats in congress, so that a new "assault weapons" ban can be passed and signed into law.

In other words, DO NOT make the mistake of thinking that, if the ban does indeed expire in September, our work is done. It will, in fact, have only just begun, with a successful 2004 election being an integral part of ensuring our victory is not short-lived.

For more see
Assault Weapons Ban Sunset
 
Agreed,
The quest for freedom is ongoing, never finished and not without sacrifice.

But it sure is worth it!
 
ALL you have to do is read the last two new and improved bans from last year to get a real chill up your spine. The last version even was going to ban Ruger 10/22's as an assault rifle along with the mini-14 garrands carbines etc.

They you also have to wonder about Kennedy and Kerry wanting to ban all centerfire rifle ammo, especially the "armor piercing rounds like the 30-30", since they can "breach a policman's soft armor vest."

:barf: :eek:
 
The solution is we all need to get out and vote, because those gun hating moms do it and we gun loving dads need to do it to. If not say good bye to your play pals and home defense. I agree with the above mentioned posts
 
I agree. A Kerry Presidency would almost guarantee a new assault weapons ban.

If you want more than a few months to buy standard-capacity mags, better vote for Bush.
 
It'll mostly be features that were removed from existing weapons, so we can have AR's that look right again for example

real adj. stocks
flash suppressors
bayonet lugs
full cap mags

I thought the "street sweepers" were hokey but there's got to be some new shotgun ideas that were blocked

there will be mixed emotions from people who stocked up on $100 full cap Glock mags as "investments" (funny, Browning HP prices didn't even twitch :p )

That's the thing about the ban, it was mostly cosmetic. Manufacturers just tweaked the aesthetics and kept on keepin' on.

Looking forward to reasonable collapsible stock AR prices again. M-forgery here I come. :D
 
Back
Top