Father of two stabbed to death by burgler

Faithless

New member
Teacher Stabbed to Death by Burglar

By David Stringer and Nick Allen, Crime Correspondent, PA News

A school teacher was stabbed to death in a violent struggle with a burglar as his family and other relatives slept upstairs in his £1 million home, detectives said tonight.

Robert Norman Symons, 45, was attempting to protect his family when he suffered a single fatal wound in the fight with the intruder.

Mr Symons had rushed downstairs to tackle the burglar at around 4.30am. Moments later he was found in a pool of blood by his wife.

Police said the teacher’s two-year-old and five-year-old daughters and other relatives were asleep upstairs in the three-storey Edwardian house in Airedale Avenue, an upmarket area of Chiswick, west London.

A police source said: “This man was trying to protect his home and his loved ones.”

Mr Symons’ wife, Linda Davies, thought to be a photographer, called an ambulance and the teacher was taken to Charing Cross hospital where he died from his injuries.

Detective Chief Superintendent Andy Murphy, leading the inquiry, said: “His wife and family have witnessed a horrific crime.

“Shortly after 4.30am at the address at 38 Airedale Avenue, Mr Symons and his wife heard a noise in the kitchen.

“He went downstairs to investigate and we think it’s quite likely that Mr Symons disturbed an intruder and a fight broke out with a burglar or burglars.

“This appears to have been a burglary gone wrong.”

He said officers were speaking to the family and confirmed that a number of Mr Symons’s relatives were staying at the house at the time of his murder.

Mr Murphy said the struggle took place inside the house and added that it was moments after the break-in, before the intruder had a chance to take anything.

He said Mr Symons’s wife heard the commotion and came downstairs to find her husband fatally wounded.

It is thought she may have seen her husband stabbed or glimpsed the killer and any accomplice flee the house.

“The front door was ajar as his wife came downstairs and she saw it swing shut, we do not know if she witnessed the attack and she is now with officers and is very distressed,” said Mr Murphy.

He said detectives were working to establish if any Mr Symons’s children witnessed their father’s death.

Mr Murphy warned homeowners about confronting intruders and said: “If a person hears someone in their home and they’re near a phone our advice is to call the police, but people have to react to the circumstances they are in.”

Officers spent the day scouring gardens, gutters and rubbish bins, removing a number of items for forensic examination along the tree-lined avenue, but Mr Murphy said it is not yet known if the murder weapon has been found.

He said efforts were continuing to trace a suspect seen leaving the house who was captured on local CCTV and described as white, wearing a light-coloured short-sleeved shirt.

It is though the killer may have had an accomplice and detectives have conducted extensive house-to-house inquiries to find witnesses who saw anyone rush from the scene.

Mr Symons is thought to have moved into his house two years ago and had previously been a businessman with interests in property and IT.

It is believed he had recently retrained as a teacher was working at a London comprehensive, telling friends he hoped to “give something back to the community“.

One local resident and friend said: “He appeared the type who would confront an intruder in his home.

“He was very gentle, very nice and always had a friendly word for the neighbours. They were a respectable and intellectual couple.”

Police confirmed a post mortem examination would be held at Fulham mortuary tomorrow morning.

The murder came on the eve of publication of Home Office quarterly recorded crime data which is expected to show a rise in violent crime.

Annual figures published in July showed reported violent crime had risen 12% in the year to March, compared with the previous 12 months.

http://news.scotsman.com/latest.cfm?id=3652037
 
Brave man. Too bad this is how his government wanted it to turn out. Now his children are orphans, however we can all feel really good about ourselves that the burglars were not shot.
 
This is an unbelievable outrage!


How could a teacher possibly afford a £1 million home? ;)


(Sorry, bad taste. Couldn't resist.)
 
The only thing that went wrong at that burglary is the wrong body got carried out. If that SOB had been in my house, he would have learned about what a bad idea it is to bring a knife to a gunfight.
 
A school teacher was stabbed to death in a violent struggle with a burglar as his family and other relatives slept upstairs in his £1 million home, detectives said tonight.
I guess they mention the value of his home so that the soulless ghoul leftists can say that the "RICH" guy got what he deserved. :barf:
 
The only thing the police are good for when someone with violent intentions breaks into your house, is to put a tape outline around the body. Yours if you do not own a gun and pull it and fire immediately, meaning don't think that showing it is going to scare someone, if they see it, they had better hear it. His, if you pull aim squeeze repeat. I would not even get close in case he was playing possum, call 911 and keep him in sight and keep your weapon at hand.
 
Well, he's lucky he didn't stab his attacker - he'd gone to prison!

------------------

All hail Comrade Blair & co
 
I'm not sure if I would place all the blame for the murdered homeowner's lack of effective defense on the UK Government.

Obtaining a shotgun in London, so far as I can tell, isn't impossible. It seems to work on a type of "shall-issue" permit process that we're all familiar with for concealed carry permits here in the US.

Why didn't this victim take advantage of at least the opportunity to own a shotgun? As well all know they are ideal home-defense weapons, even with young children in the home since long guns of any type are generally those which children are the least likely to attempt to play with.

There are restrictive storage requirements in the UK, and courts seem to have a skewed approach to the rights of criminals, but still, the bottom line is that this victim could have had a shotgun if he had chosen to.

http://www.met.police.uk/firearms-enquiries/s_apply1.htm
 
From all I have heard - on the internet for the most part, so there may be some misunderstanding on my behalf - one can only meet force with like force when defending oneself in the U.K.

So if someone breaks in to one's house with a knife, one could of course brandish a shotgun at the thug, but if one actually shot the thug, one would be up on murder charges. I suppose that in this case a cricket or baseball bat would have been more useful. Then again anything is generally better than nothing. Makes me wonder whether a bayonet would have been considered "like force"?

Personally, if I am forced to draw/use a weapon - and I pray that I won't be again - I am going to use that weapon immediately. If a thug wants dialog, he should attack someone other than me.

I suppose if this particular person had a shotgun he could have hoped the thug would run away, or as a last ditch effort he could have tried to club the thug with the gun (usually not as good an idea as it may seem), but then of course he could have also shot the thug, and lived... in prison.

Too bad he didn't use his wealth to move someplace decent since innocent human life in the U.K. doesn't seem to have the least bit of value at all.

It's situations like this that make me sick to think that I have English relatives. :barf:
 
one can only meet force with like force when defending oneself in the U.K.
If this is true, and I have no reason to believe that it isn't, then one would need to carry a dizzying array of defensive and offensive weapons at all times. This law encourages people to go completely defenseless or at least to choose an ineffective defensive implement.
 
This law encourages people to go completely defenseless or at least to choose an ineffective defensive implement.
Bingo!

And from what I gathered from the THR (and perhaps here as well) poster "agricola" one cannot legally carry any weapon outside the home.

Those people are a sad bunch. I only hope that when their troops return home that this new generation of heroes will make England as great as she once was. Time will tell.
 
Quoting Law made simple: 11th edition, by David Barker and Colin Padfield, page 193 on self defence in English law:

(i) Self defence

It is lawful for a person to defend himself or herself against an assault or battery. The defence must be proportionate to the attack, no more force being used in defence of oneself than is reasonbly necessary. What is reasonable or commensurate with the neccessity is a matter for decision by the court on the particular facts of each case. If, for example, A throws a jug of water at B which splashes B (an assault and battery), it follows that B cannot lawfully resist or claim a defence by shooting A.

(ii) Defence of property

Similiar rules apply to the defence of ones property, including a house. An occupier may use reasonable force to eject a trespasser.


On carrying weapons outside your house:

The Prevention of Crime Act 1953 (Section 1(1)) states that:

'Any person who without lawful authority or reasonable excuse, the proof whereof shall lie with him/her, has with him/her in a public place any offensive weapon, shall be guilty of an offence.'

An offensive weapon means any article made or adapted for causing injury, or intended to cause injury.


Cited from here
 
cool hand luke
I'm not sure if I would place all the blame for the murdered homeowner's lack of effective defense on the UK. Government.Obtaining a shotgun in London, so far as I can tell, isn't impossible. It seems to work on a type of "shall-issue" permit process that we're all familiar with for concealed carry permits here in the US

A number of years ago this was true. What was called a "Shotgun Certificate" was obtainable by anyone aged 15 years and older, provided it was specified for shooting game or "sporting use" such as clays. But each individual application was always at the sole discretion of the regional Chief Constable.

Legislation in the meantime has reduced the criteria considerably, and cases (such as that of the elderly farmer, Martin) clearly show that anyone using a firearm or other deadly weapon in self defense is almost certain to be the subject of a Crown Prosecution case.

The U.K. government certainly is responsible for this, as it is they who have maliciously prosecuted both the means to self defense of British subjects, and the application of the law.
 
From all I have heard - on the internet for the most part, so there may be some misunderstanding on my behalf - one can only meet force with like force when defending oneself in the U.K.

So if someone breaks in to one's house with a knife, one could of course brandish a shotgun at the thug, but if one actually shot the thug, one would be up on murder charges.
The answer is quite simple, they should kill parliement.
Really people, when it comes to protecting yourself accept no substitutes. Does California law prevent you from carrying a concealed weapon? Tell California law where to shove it. If the law is wrong, break the law. The only reason bad laws can be enforced is because most people don't have the balls to do just that. Personally I'm packing anywhere I go (unless the owner of a private establishment asks me - I respect other people's property) and if the government doesn't like it the government can say hello to my little friend.
 
Back
Top