I suppose you never forget your first handgun. I had always wanted a legendary 1911 and on spotting a stainless AMT at a gun show decades ago at an affordable price I brought it home.
The AMT turned out to be difficult and like a lot of relationships required some work to keep running right. It wasn't until many years later with the advent of on line forums that I discovered I was hardly alone issues with this maker of guns. It seems like we could only go five or six rounds without having a function problem. Eventually I let it go, trading it in for a much nicer rifle.
Not long after that I found a Kimber TLE/ RL II available in an ad on an online gun trader. The opinion of my online friends varied. Some liked it, some hated it, some felt it wasn't the right gun for me. Most of those that didn't like it had not spent any time with it but had heard rumors and bad things about it and felt like they had to pass that information along just to make sure I was ok.
But I felt the urge... like this could be a good fit. The nostalgia beckoned. And so I brought it home. And although it was familiar it wasn't quite the same. I had fired and owned a lot of guns since then and had found that there were distinct advantages to a light weight pistol with a capacity closer to 20 than 10. Still, I tried to make it work.
The Kimber functioned flawlessly, was much better looking than the AMT and had a lot of details and extras that made it easier to use. It was dead accurate too. For such an old gun design it was quite modern, yet it just seemed... so impractical with it's heavy weight and it's low capacity. It was loud and clunky with clicks and clacks during operations instead of quiet little snicks. After a few thousand rounds it got pulled out of the safe less and less often. Eventually I stuck a .22 conversion kit on it and it languished for years as my .22 practice pistol all while the plastic guns got more than their fair share of play time.
Then the other day I felt the urge and pulled it and put it back the way it was supposed to be and something funny happened.
The accuracy was still there, better than of the plastic guns. I then remembered about rapid fire with a 1911. Apparently I can point shoot the heavy old hand cannon much faster and retain accuracy with it much better than with any of the plastic guns. I think it has something to do with the weight of the gun. At 10 yards I can cover a group with my hand in about the time it takes me to pull the trigger. I can't do that with a plastic gun, not even close. Accurate slow fire at long range is amazing and easy.
The old gun has it's charms. Maybe it's not a daily driver perhaps more for special occasions but it has it's charms.
The AMT turned out to be difficult and like a lot of relationships required some work to keep running right. It wasn't until many years later with the advent of on line forums that I discovered I was hardly alone issues with this maker of guns. It seems like we could only go five or six rounds without having a function problem. Eventually I let it go, trading it in for a much nicer rifle.
Not long after that I found a Kimber TLE/ RL II available in an ad on an online gun trader. The opinion of my online friends varied. Some liked it, some hated it, some felt it wasn't the right gun for me. Most of those that didn't like it had not spent any time with it but had heard rumors and bad things about it and felt like they had to pass that information along just to make sure I was ok.
But I felt the urge... like this could be a good fit. The nostalgia beckoned. And so I brought it home. And although it was familiar it wasn't quite the same. I had fired and owned a lot of guns since then and had found that there were distinct advantages to a light weight pistol with a capacity closer to 20 than 10. Still, I tried to make it work.
The Kimber functioned flawlessly, was much better looking than the AMT and had a lot of details and extras that made it easier to use. It was dead accurate too. For such an old gun design it was quite modern, yet it just seemed... so impractical with it's heavy weight and it's low capacity. It was loud and clunky with clicks and clacks during operations instead of quiet little snicks. After a few thousand rounds it got pulled out of the safe less and less often. Eventually I stuck a .22 conversion kit on it and it languished for years as my .22 practice pistol all while the plastic guns got more than their fair share of play time.
Then the other day I felt the urge and pulled it and put it back the way it was supposed to be and something funny happened.
The accuracy was still there, better than of the plastic guns. I then remembered about rapid fire with a 1911. Apparently I can point shoot the heavy old hand cannon much faster and retain accuracy with it much better than with any of the plastic guns. I think it has something to do with the weight of the gun. At 10 yards I can cover a group with my hand in about the time it takes me to pull the trigger. I can't do that with a plastic gun, not even close. Accurate slow fire at long range is amazing and easy.
The old gun has it's charms. Maybe it's not a daily driver perhaps more for special occasions but it has it's charms.