FAA Plans Strict ID Checks for Cops

Skyhawk

New member
http://www.apbnews.com/cjprofessionals/behindthebadge/2000/06/06/faa0606_01.html

FAA Plans Strict ID Checks for Cops
Agents Fear Ban on Flying Armed Could Follow

June 6, 2000

By James Gordon Meek

WASHINGTON (APBnews.com) -- The Federal Aviation Administration is set to issue a security directive this week ordering airports to more carefully screen the credentials of law enforcement officers who wish to fly armed aboard commercial aircraft, officials told APBnews.com today.

The move comes in the wake of a General Accounting Office (GAO) investigation in which undercover agents used fake badges bought off the Internet to gain access to secure government buildings and airports.

The FAA's potential next move, say angry federal agents, will be to only allow Secret Service and FBI agents to fly armed.

"This will hinder ongoing criminal investigations," said Richard Gallo, president of the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association. "The FAA has valid security concerns, but their solution is mind-boggling. It's incredible."

Airport police to check badges

Under the FAA security directive, all law enforcement identification would be checked by airport police.

Private security guards who screen travelers will no longer be permitted to wave anyone through who flashes a badge.

In addition, non-federal law enforcement officers will have to provide both a letter establishing an officer's credentials and a private telephone number that airline security officials can call at any time to confirm the credentials.

Federal agents welcome move

Gallo, a U.S. Department of Agriculture special agent in the office of the inspector general, said he alerted his members last week of the FAA proposals and plans. He said federal agents welcome the airport police checks.

Gallo said he recently attended an interagency meeting with federal law enforcement officials, the FAA and airline industry representatives, who admitted they would prefer a total ban on flying armed.

Of more immediate concern, he said, is the possibility that the FAA will further restrict the ability of officers to fly armed by only permitting FBI, Secret Service agents and FAA air marshals the privilege.

Counterfeit-proof ID

FAA spokeswoman Rebecca Trexler said further restrictions were a distinct possibility unless federal authorities can invent a wallet credential that is counterfeit-proof.

Trexler said the process of devising such an ID could take months -- if it's even possible.

"It's only if we can't come up with a new credential that we have to look at restricting law enforcement officers from carrying arms on board [commercial aircraft] or into sterile areas," Trexler said.

Any area in an airport terminal that is beyond a security checkpoint is considered to be "sterile," because metal and explosive residue devices have theoretically screened people in those areas.

Airports have other problems

Gallo said his members strongly oppose a gun ban for sworn officers taking commercial flights within the United States.

Citing recent crimes where airport employees were arrested for smuggling drugs at U.S. airports, Gallo said of a potential ban: "The FAA and the industry need to get their own house in order before they obliterate the ability of law enforcement to do our jobs."

In May, investigators from the GAO, the investigative arm of Congress, successfully entered federal buildings and other restricted areas, such as airports, by using phony IDs and badges purchased from Internet sites. Some in Congress now want to ban the sale of realistic-looking badges on the Internet; the real problem, others say, is lax security.

"We are issuing new requirements for security measures that would compensate for issues GAO raised," Trexler said.

Asked if she was aware of incidents where a hijacker or terrorist used fake law enforcement credentials to gain access to a civilian aircraft, Trexler said she was not.
 
The problem is "minimum wage" security personal who could give a "rats behind" about their job. Yes there are some good security folks at the air port but the operative word here is "some".

Bring the wages up to standard and have "Real" LEO's perform the security duties at the airport and the problem would be solved.
 
The captain of an airliner has the last say on if someone flies armed.

The only time I've flown to get a critter from another jurisdiction, I had to stow my pistol in my luggage (not the carry-on) for the trip out, after I got the critter from Chicago PD, we were supposed to fly back by American Airlines. The captain of the flight we were supposed to fly back tweaked out and demanded that I again stow my pistol in my luggage.

I respectfully declined. He threw me and my critter off his plane. Not a thing I could do about it.

I've heard a story, might be an Urban Legend, about an FBI agent en route somewhere having a airline captain trying to throw the Feebie off his plane for CCW, and the Feebie commandeered the plane. :D

LawDog
 
"The Federal Aviation Administration is set to issue a security directive...ordering airports to more carefully screen the credentials of law enforcement officers who wish to fly armed aboard commercial aircraft..."

"The FAA's potential next move, say angry federal agents, will be to only allow Secret Service and FBI agents to fly armed."


Nothing like the shoe being on the other foot to make these hypocrites show their true colors.
 
Lawdog is right: the Captain can disallow anyone from flying on "his" ship if he wants to, iirc. All LEO's carrying on board are supposed to declare themselves as carrying to the captain and crew. My understanding is you generally need a letter from a commanding officer, stating that you are on official business, unless you are a Federal Agent. Even they have to declare themselves. Air Marshal's may be the exception, and much of their firearms training is specific to situation that would occur in-flight. Their qualification course-of-fire is pretty demanding, btw.

There was a news story I read somewhere recently (maybe linked here on a TFL post) in which airline crews related incidents of LEO's accidentally leaving their weapons on board the plane after disembarking (dohhhh!). One left his in the head. One captain said he had a "very, very nervous" agent declare herself as armed, and was in obvious terror of flying. He almost demanded that she check her weapon, in the theory that if her judgement were impaired by her phobia, she shouldn't be armed. He didn't do it, but said he would the next time.

I too find it amusing that some LEO's are crying foul, at a restriction in their right to carry. Gee, we don't have any of thjose, even with CCW's, do we?! Many of them aren't as proficient or well-trained as many here on TFL (no offense intended to the many skilled LEO's out there... you have my sincere appreciation). I do worry, though, about the "rent-a-cops" checking ID's at the airport... it has always seemed to me that it would be extremely easy to badge them and get in the sterile areas. I have made it a hobby while travelling to stand back and watch at the checkpoints, and observe as many sloppy procedures as i can. MANY....too many.One time the "officer" waved my wife around, and pushed the baby stroller and baby around the mag without checking it at all, while we went through. The kid could literally have been concealing an MP-5 or a brick of C4. I was stunned.

The idea of airport SWORN cops checking credentials seems a good one to me (although if you are an LEO taking someone to the airport, I think you should be able to carry in the airport even if not flying... never too much security). imo

[This message has been edited by Covert Mission (edited June 07, 2000).]
 
Back
Top