Embrace The Truth - Catastrophic Gun Failure

Status
Not open for further replies.

Brian Ward

Inactive
Thompson / Center Arms Found at Fault in Catastrophic Gun Failure


On September 1, 2005, I was severely injured by a catastrophic gun failure. My face was permanently disfigured and sight in my right eye was lost forever. I was shooting with the Thompson/Center Encore Rifle. It blew apart because of a defect in its design. That horrendous day propelled me down a path I never planned on or wanted in my life. I’m not speaking out for personal gain or to be vindictive toward Smith & Wesson or Thompson/Center Arms (Thompson/Center Arms has apparently been sold to Smith & Wesson). I merely want the truth about this rifle to be known. I don’t want anyone to go through the pain and suffering I’ve endured. In my opinion, this rifle defect is something that was known about and has been covered up for years.

After almost 10 years of battling over the Encore, I received the final judgment order from the 46th Circuit Court for the County of Otsego, Michigan. I sued Thompson Center Arms (TCA), and the jury found TCA at fault. The jury found TCA to have a defect in its design and found their manual to be defective.

Throughout this entire process, from the day that my rifle had failed, until being given the green light to speak freely about this rifle, I have felt as though I’m involved in a David and Goliath scenario. In the end, no matter how much money they threw at this problem, with their team of lawyers and paid experts, the truth could not be veiled from the jury. At many points over the nearly 10 years since my injury, I have experienced hopelessness about the outcome of the case. One of these moments occurred during the trial. My attorney had in his possession letters, obtained from Thompson/Center through discovery, from other individuals who had incurred similar injuries from the same type of failure. Although the letters were discussed in open court, they were not allowed to be shown to the jury as evidence, based on a technicality concerning Thompson / Center’s claims as to when they had actually received the letters in relation to the date of my injury. A representative of the company did admit that he saw failures of this kind during testing. He also admitted that TCA destroys customer complaints every six months.

Because of the pending suit, I have not been able to share these details until recently. I cannot adequately express what a tremendous relief it is to be able to finally share the truth about the dangers of this rifle.

Most gun owners I know - including myself - thought suing a gun company was practically blasphemy. My suit was never about anything more than seeking truth. I believe wholeheartedly in the Constitution and stand for our Second Amendment rights. I love freedom. I was an NRA member when my injury occurred and I’m an NRA member now.

This is the first lawsuit brought against TCA regarding this rifle that has been successfully litigated. In my opinion, TCA is fighting me so hard because the Encore Rifle has been wildly popular. A recall would cost potentially a lot of money. Still, I am now finally allowed to spread the truth about this gun. Please notify anyone you know who owns this rifle that it could catastrophically fail!

The judgment is attached. I have blacked out the award amounts because the money is not important in this regard. No amount of money can compensate me for the loss of my sight and the years spent in recovery. Additionally, I truly believe this company will continue to fight this judgment, and as a result I will never see any monetary compensation. The court documents are now a matter of public record, and if you wish to seek out more details they can be obtained.

Thank you for your time, and if you would like any additional information please let me know.

Sincerely,

Brian Ward
 
I am glad you received compensation for your injury, but I would like to learn more about the defect(s) of the design that caused the failure and your injury, and whether TC has corrected the problem.

As to suing a gun company, a gun is a product. If a company makes a product that it knows, or learns, is defective, there is no reason it should not be sued. I think most of us, though, deplore the idea of ant-gun activists suing gun companies as a backdoor way of driving gun companies out of business and thus eliminating gun ownership.

Jim
 
Hmmm. What was the specific failure point? Just a weak chamber that could not contain SAAMI-spec'ed ammo, or something else? Thanks for the information and wish you a recovery - where's the link the the judgment?
 
Brian Ward said:
Still, I am now finally allowed to spread the truth about this gun...

...if you would like any additional information please let me know.

eh...ok...the truth being what? What was/is the design flaw? How likely is it that someone else's gun will grenade and under what conditions? Sorry about your troubles, but to others here, this stuff seems most germane.
 
A quick check of Google indicates that Brian Ward has posted this exact same message on at least 2 other national firearms forums with no more details than he has posted here. HMMM.
 
Because of the pending suit, I have not been able to share these details until recently. I cannot adequately express what a tremendous relief it is to be able to finally share the truth about the dangers of this rifle.


He sure didn't share much.
 
Has anyone seen or or heard anything anywhere about major failures with TC Encores?I did some searches and found nothing.The OP makes it sound like a common thing.Just wondering would have thought something would be on one of the shooting forums.
 
Has anyone seen or or heard anything anywhere about major failures with TC Encores?

The only Encore i heard of blowing up was chambered for either 6.5mm or 7mm Shooting Times Westerner: There was a photo of the destroyed gun on a gun board.

Those STW cases are based on the blown out full length 8mm magnium case. Some say Encore barrels chambered for those rounds have insufficient metal remaining over the shoulder of the round.

I also decline to chamber Encore barrels for the H&H head size and the still larger diameter .378 and .460 Weatherby rounds or rounds based on these cases and rounds like 7mm STW. They are just too close to the "ragged edge" of what the Encore will handle routinely.

http://www.bellmtcs.com/store/index.php?cid=571&
I get requests for these daily. They are too much for the Encore and stretch the frame too much. The Encore is NOT the equivalent of any decent modern bolt action and will NOT handle the additional force exerted from the larger diameter chambers unless they are either down loaded to lower pressure levels or given essentially a long "Weatherby-style" freebore, which undermines accuracy.
 
Last edited:
There are laws that prevent any federal government agency from monitoring, testing or forcing any gun company to recall a defective firearm. By law it is voluntary and there are no legally binding safety standards related to firearms. With any other consumer product this is not so. The ATF is responsible for making sure certain legal requirements are met as to the manufacture, transportation and sale, but there is nothing that monitors or guarantees safety and quality. That applies to ammo as well, SAAMI standards are voluntary, not government regulated.

The good news, this makes it a lot harder for anti's to use legislation as a backdoor gun control tool. I support these laws and do not wish to see them changed.

The bad news, there isn't much to guarantee that any gun company will actually produce a safe product. The same laws that make it impossible for the government to regulate the safe manufacture of weapons also make it a lot harder to prove something is defective when it really is.

It is our responsibility to hold manufacturers accountable. Reward those who do the right thing, and don't buy products from those who do not.

I'm not familiar with the TC issues and would also like to know more. Not that I doubt the OP, just for my personal knowledge. I have zero interest in an Encore, but until I know more I'm going to remain neutral. I believe the OP got a defective rifle and a jury confirmed this after a trial. But for now I'll not judge the entire line.

I do know this much. I'm very much up to date on the Remington trigger issues. Have been following this closely for over 20 years when one of my rifles malfunctioned. I'm absolutely 100% certain the problem is real, certain Remington management has known about it for almost 70 years and understand what is happening. I've seen the ways they have manipulated the truth and tried to blame the victims. So I can understand how the OP must feel at this point. I've also observed how so many refuse to believe the truth and choose to believe it is just a vast gun control conspiracy. This attitude isn't helping any of us.

If we as shooters don't hold the manufacturers accountable there could very well be a time when our elected officials have had enough and pass laws none of us want.
 
Brian Ward v. Thompson/Center Arms Company, Inc., et al., in the Forty-Sixth Circuit Court for Otsego County, Michigan.

The complaint was filed on October 16, 2006 and alleges that the plaintiff sustained eye injuries using a Thompson/Center Arms rifle. The plaintiff asserts product liability claims against both our company and the retailer based on negligence and warranty principles. The plaintiff is seeking an unspecified amount of compensatory damages.

On November 15, 2006, we filed an answer denying all allegations of liability.

On February 2, 2009, the plaintiff filed a second amended complaint.

On February 17, 2009, we filed our answer to the plaintiff’s complaint.

On October 9, 2009, we filed a motion for summary judgment.

On October 21, 2009, the plaintiff opposed our motion.

A hearing on our motion for summary judgment was held on November 3, 2009.

Expert discovery is ongoing.

A case evaluation as required by the Michigan court was held on November 13, 2009, in which the panel recommended a settlement in favor of the plaintiff in the amount of $325. We rejected this proposed settlement award.

On December 12, 2009, the court granted our motion for summary judgment on the manufacturing defect, failure to recall, and failure to test claims, and denied our motion on the design defect claims under the theories of risk-utility and failure to warn.

A settlement conference was scheduled for August 5, 2010, but was postponed because the plaintiff’s counsel is retiring.

A settlement conference was held on November 2, 2010 with no agreement reached.

Trial is scheduled to begin in May 2012.

Jan 2012 S&W Holding Company Report, provided by username "Popeye" of many gun boards.

No further details have been found yet.

Regards,

Josh
 
Hi, jmr40,

I assume you are speaking of mandatory federal proof laws and some kind of mandatory government firearms testing and certification process, or even government ownership of all firearms production. It is not surprising that most gun owners oppose such laws, even though some accidents might be prevented.

Of course, were such laws enacted, anyone injured by a defective firearm (assuming ordinary citizens would be allowed to obtain a firearm from the government factory) could receive compensation only if the government could be sued, something it probably would not allow.

But even though we have no government proof laws or testing, gun makers can certainly be sued for damage resulting from a defective product, as can any other manufacturer. Remington has been sued over the Model 700 triggers, and has lost. Other gun makers have been successfully sued for defective products.

But the anti-gun faction has not sued because of guns that failed, but because of guns that work, arguing that guns are inherently deadly and dangerous instruments, made only to murder, and that anyone making or selling such a product is liable for any harm that comes to anyone, under any circumstances, through the use of that product.

Jim
 
If Mr. Ward does not provide information as to the nature of the defective design, this thread is a waste of bandwidth and will be closed as off-topic for the forum.
 
To summarize and very very briefly in my opinion the big take away from my case was the TCA Encore can not keep tolerances and head space grows overtime, especially with larger calibers like I was shooting (300 win mag).

In my trial we had 3 guns with excessive head space.

My gun was out of spec.
A gun with 5 shots was out of spec.
A gun with no shots was out of spec.
 
I was firing hand loads, but my cartridges were not over SAAMI spec. PSI.

When an entity essentially has unlimited money to bring doubt, defame, etc.. it’s an up hill battle.
 
When an entity essentially has unlimited money to bring doubt, defame, etc.. it’s an up hill battle.

I'm sure it is but you have shown that hill is not to steep to climb. I'm very sorry for your loss due to the injury.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top