My own personal experience with the EAA 10mm Match Witness has been poor. I really liked the look, feel, fit and finish of the gun. I liked the CZ-knockoff factor--I've always been a CZ fan. I should have just gotten an actual CZ, is what I've come to realize.
Anyway, my fanboyness isn't really the important thing.
I had cycling issues with my EAA (about 3-4 every 10 to 15 round magazine), and I sent it back into the factory with no luck or help from them. I basically got charged for nothing. However, I will admit now that I know more about inconsistencies in loadings of the 10mm cartridge itself, I should have tried more ammunition types. The ammunition I had purchased with the gun was locally manufactured and did not list the bullet weight, the ft/lbs, or ft/sec. Since some 10mm is loaded to basically .40 S&W instead of full-power 10mm, I could have been using weak target ammunition. But my deciding factor to sell that gun came down to the low availability of 10mm locally. I didn't want to spend $40 to $50 a box at Gander Mountain to learn that my EAA Match didn't cycle it either.
If I got another 10mm, I'd be tempted to buy a Glock and be done with it. I haven't heard of 10mm Glocks having cycling issues with weak ammo, and so it might make perfect 10mm in that you can fire both quality (hot) and crappy target (weak) loads. Either that or I'd buy a 10mm Dan Wesson or other quality 1911 and be prepared to change recoil springs or spend a lot finding the correct ammunition. Now that 10mm is more popular and there are more affordable offerings of 10mm on the internet, it may be a more viable option to those who are "cost sensitive" shooters such as I.
Do you do handloading?