Document forger hailed as a hero by Democrats, liar by everyone else

long-time demoncrap fundraiser, disability seeker, Bush-hater, document forger and speaker at local Democratic party shindigs has been outed as the source of the CBS forgeries.

From NewsMax - http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/9/17/04253.shtml

The Texas man who was named on Thursday as the source of forged documents aired by disgraced newsman Dan Rather accepted an invitation to address a local Democratic Party gathering earlier this year - and is a regular poster to pro-Democrat Web sites.

Retired National Guard Lt. Bill Burkett is viewed as "an intelligent activist or statesman of sorts" by local Democratic Party officials, reports Friday's Washington Post.......

It seems he has a history of false allegations.

From the Houston Chronicle - http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/front/2799919

WASHINGTON - Bill Burkett, who has emerged as a possible CBS source for disputed memos about President Bush's Guard service, has a long history of making charges against Bush and the Texas National Guard.

But Burkett's allegations have changed over the years, and have been dismissed as baseless by former Guard colleagues, state legislators and others.

Even Burkett has admitted some of his allegations are false..........
 
I couldn't find anything linking him to Demonrats Underground. Perhaps it is somewhere in one of the two links, but if it is, I missed it.

In fact, given quotes from the story like:
The CBS report used documents signed by since-deceased Texas Air National Guard Lt. Col. Jerry Killian to suggest Bush disobeyed a direct order to take a flight physical in 1972.
I suspect that the author Michael Hedges is just being used as a shill to put out a story that will take attention away from the most likely source of the - as Mr. Hedges puts it - "documents". That is to say Clinton operatives - many of whom are directly employed by the "Yutz of the Year", one John "Victor Charlie" Kerry. If Mr. Hedges isn't a shill, then he's just an idiot, since at this point even a half-bright piece of inbred trash can figure out that these are "alleged" documents.

First of all, they are bad forgeries, not documents.

Second, Mr. Bill Burkett was a National Guard officer, and therefore would have been an extremely unlikely candidate to forge "documents" that were not even formatted in a style consistent with Air National Guard SOP (standard operating procedure). I suspect that Mr. Bill Burkett would have done a much better job of creating "documents" that actually looked like they could have been produced by someone aware of military protocol with regard to memoranda, e.g. filing numbers, proper dates, etc...

Third, Mr. Bill Burkett's name (his previous problems with President Bush notwithstanding) is a little too easily confused with one B.G. Burkett, the co-author of 'Stolen Valor' an incredibly important book that is in fact a thorn in the side of one John "Victor Charlie" Kerry, in that it is perhaps the #1 treatise that exposed the lies of Kerry and his ilk. Most of the mopes in this country are not only completely unaware of the book, but would also be easily duped into discrediting B.G. Burkett by associating him with this so-called "activist" Bill Burkett.

These "documents" smell like a Clinton operation to me. I'm not buying this version of where they came from.
 
A little light fiction.....

From the Houston Chronicle, by Michael Hedges
WASHINGTON - Bill Burkett …possible CBS source for disputed memos about President Bush's Guard service, has a long history of making charges against Bush and the Texas National Guard.
Burkett's allegations have changed over the years, and have been dismissed as baseless by former Guard colleagues, state legislators and others.
Even Burkett has admitted some of his allegations are false.

Burkett wrote a long indictment against Bush for a Web site in 2003 in which he said he personally was ordered to "alter personnel records of George W. Bush." In that article, Burkett said that when he refused he was sent to Panama as punishment, where he contracted a disabling disease.
But when asked about that charge by the Houston Chronicle in February, Burkett said, "That statement was not accurate, that is overstated."

In February, Burkett said he witnessed documents from Bush's records in a garbage can at a Guard base in Austin.
"My eyes fixed on the first page," he said in an interview in February. "It had Bush, George W. Lt1. What I did next still bothers me. I browsed through the top five or six pages."

Texas Guard officials said no Texas Air Guard records had ever been stored at the facility Burkett named.

Scene from the Texas Air Guard, sometime in the late 1990s…..

The unscrupulous but upwardly mobile high-ranking officer is seated at his desk in the Air Guard headquarters. His uniform is clean and perfectly pressed. He has emblems of rank on his epaulets, collars, and cufflinks. He has numerous decoration ribbons on his shirt. On the wall behind him is a picture of himself in dress uniform.

The telephone rings…

UUMHR Officer: Texas Air Guard, Commander Dastardly speaking… Hello Governor Bush. Yes, I remember you were an officer here once. “Clean out” your records, sir? Yes, I understand. Let’s see, that’s an offense under the Uniformed Code of Military Justice; I could be stripped of rank and removed from service, destroy my career and loose my pension. Not to mention being a rather dishonorable and naughty thing to do.

But, sir, since it’s you, and you might be elected President someday (by the way, is the Florida voting plan coming along?) and I’m unscrupulous and incompetent, but desire a promotion, I’ll do it. At once!

[He salutes the telephone and hangs up.]

The unscrupulous but upwardly mobile high-ranking officer sits in silence for a moment. Then he presses an intercom buzzer.

UUMHR Officer: Evil, not too bright but slavishly faithful henchman? Please step in my office, will you?

ENBSFH enters. He is large, fat and slovenly. He has a hump on one side of his back, a cast to the eye on the other side, wild hair, buck teeth and drools slightly. His clothes fit him like an unmade bed. He has sergeant’s stripes.

ENBSFH: Yes, master?

UUMHR Officer: Ah, very good, henchman. I want you to find Governor Bush’s records, and destroy anything that might show he was anything but a perfect officer and pilot.

ENBSFH: Of course, master. What should I destroy?

UUMHR Officer: Oh, the usual. The court-martial papers for flying while drunk, the court-martial records for atrocities committed on Texas ranchers, his pay records, excuses for being absent signed by his father, pretty much everything. He has to look like a perfect officer. This is a secretive and highly illegal action, so only take two or three others with you to do this. Sub-henchmen you can trust. No one must ever know what we are doing here. We could all loose our cushy jobs here if we’re not very careful and cunning.

ENBSFH: Yes, master. What do you want me to do with the papers? Shred them? Burn them? Eat them?

UUMHR Officer: No, just dump them in the trash behind the building. That will be fine.

ENBSFH: Yes, master. [ENBSFH leaves, dragging one leg behind him.]

UUMHR Officer smiles to himself and speaks aloud: I will be Air Lord for this! Mother will be so proud!!!
 
"It seems he has a history of false allegations."

Even if he transcribed the information from Killian's journal, it DOES NOT mean the allegations contained in the information are false. In fact, the only eyewitness who has come forth who knew Killian says the content is 100% accurate. If Dan Rather attributed the information to the wrong source, that is his problem. It does not disprove the accuracy of the information. Like I said on another thread: even if the information came from a OuiJa board, we have a woman swearing it's true and silence from the other pilots in Bush's air group whoSHOULD have seen him at all the drills in Alabama... if he was there. The question is not where the information came from, it is whether or not it's true.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/09/15/60II/main643768.shtml

Knox says she didn’t type these memos, but she says she did type ones that contained the same information.

“Did or did not Lt. Bush take a physical as ordered by Col. Killian,” Rather asks Knox. “The last time, no he didn’t,” says Knox. “It was a big no-no to not follow orders. And I can’t remember anyone refusing to. Now for instance, with the physical, every officer knew that before his birthday he was supposed to have that flying physical. Once in a while they might be late, but there would be a good excuse for it and let the commander know and try to set up a date for a make-up. If they did not take that physical, they were off flying status until they did.”

Did Knox ever hear Killian talk about this, or did he write memos about Bush not taking the physical?

“He was upset about it. That was one of the reasons why he wrote a memo directing him to go take the physical,” says Knox. “I’m going to say this, but it seems to me that Bush felt that he was above reproach.”


Knox says that Killian started what she calls a "cover-your-back" file -- a personal file where he stored the memos about the problems with Mr. Bush's performance, his failure to take a physical, and the pressure Killian felt from upstairs.

She addressed one memo, and a reference to retired Gen. Staudt pushing for a positive officer training report on Lt. Bush.

"’Staudt is pushing to sugar coat it.’ Does that sound like Col. Killian? Is that the way it felt,” Rather asked Knox.

“That's absolutely the way he felt about that," says Knox.
 
Even if he transcribed the information from Killian's journal, it DOES NOT mean the allegations contained in the information are false. In fact, the only eyewitness who has come forth who knew Killian says the content is 100% accurate.

You seem to be forgetting TWO eyewitness' who claim that the information in the memo's is false, Gen. Staudt and Lt. Col. Udell. They would be much more "in the know" than Ms. Knox, a senior pool typist, NOT Killian's private secretary. Last week, Ms. Knox also told the Houston Cronicle that she had "no first hand knowledge" of then Lt. Bush!

She sounds like a pretty unreliable source to me. She can't even keep her story straight form one week to another. (Sounds like Kerry's Iraq policy!)

...and silence from the other pilots in Bush's air group who SHOULD have seen him at all the drills in Alabama... if he was there.

The Alabama ANG pilots would most likely NOT have seen President Bush at drills since the Alabama ANG flew different planes than Bush was qualified on. And according to Lt. Col. John Calhoun, squadron commander of the Alabama ANG unit that Bush was assigned to, then Lt. Bush was in his (Calhoun's) office studying.

The question is not where the information came from, it is whether or not it's true.

I currently have in my hands, a document showing that John Kerry was a spy for the Viet Cong. It doesn't matter where it came from (fresh off my printer!), what matters is if it's true or not. Does anyone have Dan Rather's phone number?????
 
Not a liar. A FELON. It is illegal to fabricate federal documents if I recall correctly.

Arsonists, cop-killers, drug pushers and terrorists are all heroes of the left too, so it makes perfect sense for them to praise that fraud.
 
Code:
It does not disprove the accuracy of the information.

Some people will go to the ends of the earth to splatter GW. Take a break, BountyH. We know you intensely dislike GW, but this is really reaching for something which is just not there.
I know-I know, you have made a few mentions about Kerry and your dislike for him too, but not even close to the screaming about George.

If you are so believing of an 85 year old secretaries word over an obviously FORGED document, why is it that you will not take at the same value the words of other people who were also there? Could it be that they have no FORGED documents to show as well???
I think your hate meter needs a calibration....

GW is not the best President we have ever had, but he is far from the worst...
 
Even if he transcribed the information from Killian's journal, it DOES NOT mean the allegations contained in the information are false.

I'm sorry, I can't hear you very well from the other side of that unusually enormous "IF"

:D



Seriously, you are REALLY reaching here. First of all, NOBODY I've seen except you is alleging that he "transcribe the information from a journal." The allegation is that he made the whole thing up, and there's some pretty compelling evidence.

The idea that he transcribed it manages to explain--kind of--why the documents used on the air were created with a computer program that didn't exist when the supposed documents were supposed to have been created, but it raises its own questions. The biggest is: Why would he go to all the trouble of "transcribing" the information word for word and sending off fake documents? If he had that kind of time and access to these supposed documents, why not just fax the originals? Woulda taken five minutes, tops, much less than it would have taken to "transcribe" the documents.
If he didn't have the documents long enough to fax them, he sure didn't have time to transcribe them--and he had no reason to do so, either, in that situation, because he could just as easily paraphrase and send those in (but of course, no one would believe that, would they? It's only when you produce crude approximations of a document, insist that they're real, get caught lying and switch to insisting that you just made copies of legitimate documents--which you still can't produce--that Democrats decide you must be believed. :rolleyes:
 
Back
Top