I believe that gun "buy-backs" approach zero in terms of how much they do to prevent violent crime.
I have seen coverage of these things repeatedly, and EVERY TIME, the people giving over guns are NOT the criminal element. No one had to worry that these people were going to start robbing and killing with the guns they turn in.
Here in West Palm Beach, about a year ago, the idiot mayor (Lois Frankel) and the idiot police chief (Delsa Bush) got a "buy-back" going, and spent thousands and thousands of dollars of city money. They did this because they have been utterly unable to control violent crime in certain corners of the city (overwhelmingly, what I'm talking about is black-on-black, drug-or-gang-related crime). So in order for these politicians to appear to be doing something, they cooked up the buy-back idea.
The local paper did a story about some schmuck guy who turned in a very very valuable Japanese rifle -- it was some sort of research/test rifle, not a field rifle -- and very rare. It was worth something like $4,000 or more. Someone saw the picture of the rifle in the paper, and got in touch with the guy (or something like that) and told this clueless useful idiot how much he'd just lost, and there was an appeal to the police department and the guy was actually given his valuable rifle
back!
I say, they should have destroyed it. Let people learn a lesson that they are doing this do-gooder nonsense symbolic act for NO REASON, and in the process they are likely ripping themselves off. Let word spread that good, honest people are not served by gun "buy-backs."
I'd like to know how they claim to give amnesty "unless the gun was traced to a violent crime." Do they run a trace, including forensic ballistics testing, right there while the person is turning in the gun? Do they take names, and examine identification before giving the money and taking the gun?
See, if they don't keep a record of who turned in what, how can they give amnesty? What if, upon testing the gun, they find that it was the one used in three local murders??! And they've let the guy go?!
And what if someone comes up and turns in a gun that has an obliterated serial number on it? (or, how about something that appears to be blood spatter on the muzzle?) Are they going to take the gun, but not charge the person with possession of a firearm with a defaced serial number? That's a serious crime, and indicates a good likelihood that the person was involved with other serious crimes. And they'll just let him walk, happy to have ONE gun from him?
In case you can't tell, my answer to the poll was "No".
-azurefly