Much worse was my new 223 barrel, which had what the gunsmith referred to as a “match chamber” when I called him to discuss chambering issues. Well, I didn’t ask for a match chamber, but that explained my chambering difficulties.
I've had two companies do that to me, as well.
One was a gunsmith that built competition rifles and repaired antique firearms, primarily. The 'competition rifles' part took hold of him with my rifle.
But even that was no excuse for what he did. He wanted to give me a "match" chamber (even though I didn't ask for it), but he couldn't get a "match" reamer. So, he used a standard reamer and only reamed the chamber as deeply as necessary for a crush-fit with Remington factory ammo. The chamber was still 0.003" short of SAAMI minimum.
For that one, I actually put together a combination of dies that would size small enough to work with that chamber, because it shot exceptionally well. But the gunsmith still had to do more work for me, to pay for his ignorance and arrogance.
The other was a company that kept sending me AR barrels with short chambers, due to an issue with their production process. I identified the likely cause of the production issue, which they later verified and corrected (many other customers had issues, too). ...But they told me to pound sand on the last barrel, even though my "go" gauge and bolt, and
their "go" gauges would not chamber in the barrels that I returned. Their final excuse was, "tight chambers shoot better..."
Often true... But only if you can chamber a cartridge!
I had to obtain a reamer and finish-chamber the final barrel myself.